That the prosecutors in the case of the $480,000 forfeiture case begged me not to return to press the matter further underscores the fact that there was no indictment, but that they were only after the tax on the money deposited in my accounts, presidential candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Asiwaju Ahmed Bola Tinubu, has declared.
This was his quick riposte to the dust being raised after the surfacing in the public domain of the Certified True Copy (CTC), of the ruling of a US court on issue of the said settlement payment to the government by the former Governor of Lagos State.
Tinubu, who flatly denied that the money forfeited at the instance of the Northern District Court of Illinois, linked to “Bola Tinubu” had any link with drugs, spoke through Festus Keyamo, spokesman of the All Progressives Congress (APC) Presidential Campaign Council (PCC), who stated that there was no crime linked to the money and it was purely a tax issue.
Tinubu, National Leader of the APC, who is currently angling to replace incumbent, President Muhammadu Buhari, for the nation’s number one job in Abuja, next year, has been assailed by the a groundswell of Nigerians, including Peter Obi, the Labour Party (LP), candidate for the same election, who asked him to come clean on the ugly story.
In response, to the expose of the court documents, which also stated that there was probable cause to believe that the funds in bank accounts linked to the named Tinubu were proceeds of narcotics trafficking and therefore ruled that the sum of $460,000 in one of the accounts be forfeited to the US government, in the case that was concluded in in 1993, Keyamo, a guest on Politics Today, a Channels Television political programme, on Tuesday, said the former governor was not sued or indicted on any charge, adding that the case was regarding the funds in 10 bank accounts linked to Tinubu.
Emphasising that the $460,000 forfeiture to US authorities was tax deductibles that should ordinarily accrue to the government, he explained: “These processes are mere presumptions. They found money in his (Tinubu) accounts and they said he needed to come forward. In that affidavit of Kevin Moss, they said they interviewed Mobil and Mobil said this man is a treasurer in Mobil. Mobil said the funds are not for them.
“They confirmed his status not as a criminal but as a respected employee of Mobil. It is in that affidavit. After all the rigamarole trying to find out whether the accounts where the money came from are linked to drugs, they came to the conclusion that the deposits he made — what these bankers called investments — they said he had not paid tax on these interests. That is all. Look at paragraph 38. They said it is tax. They took what belonged to them. They even begged Tinubu not to return. Just allow us take what belongs to us and go. They were begging him. It was not punishment, it was no indictment, it was just forfeiture.”
“The deposits he made there (in banks) were what bankers call investments. He kept the money there and he was getting interests. They (US government) said he had not paid tax on those interests. That is all and guess what? The banks are supposed to deduct the tax from source.
“Out of the 10 accounts, it was only one account – the one in Heritage Bank – that they took $460,000 as tax on interest that he benefited on the investment he made in those accounts. In fact, all the money in Heritage Bank was not taken; they took only $460,000 as tax.”
Apparently pointing accusing fingers on Atiku Abubakar, the candidate of the Peoples opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), as being behind the reincarnation of the controversial court document, following the former Vice President’s recent trip to the US, he said: “His (Tinubu’s) detractors kept bringing up these issues over and over when his political profile is rising, when he wants to run for office or any political turn in his life, they will bring up these issues.
“The date on the papers flying up and down, the date of certification is 2022, so they are using this to confuse people that these are fresh papers. If documents are 40 years old or 100 years old, once you go to court, and apply for certified true copies of those documents, they will give you those documents but they will stamp the day they are giving you those documents.
“This is what our detractors, the PDP, perhaps that is what they went to the US for when they pretended that they went for high-level engagement. This is part of the high-level engagement they went for.”