News
Over 2,753 Igbo properties destroyed since Sanwo-Olu’s administration – Ohanaeze Ndigbo
The leadership of Ohanaeze Ndigbo has issued a strong warning to Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, regarding what the group views as a targeted campaign of persecution against the Igbo community and their investments in the state.
In a statement released on Sunday by Okechukwu Isiguzoro, Deputy President General, and Chinemeze Ohia, National Spokesperson, Ohanaeze alleged that a total of 2,753 properties belonging to Igbo people in Lagos have been demolished by the state government since 2019.
READ ALSO: Lagos govt demolishes 19 buildings at Trade Fair complex
Declaring the need to urgently address this “menace,” the Igbo socio-political organisation demanded an immediate end to all demolition activities, particularly those aimed at Igbo investments within Lagos.
“Such measures are not merely administrative actions; they are perceived as a calculated political vendetta designed to systematically dismantle the economic contributions of the Igbo residents in Lagos State, compelling them to vacate the state in advance of the 2027 elections.
“With the utmost gravity, Ohanaeze Ndigbo condemns the recent demolitions of shops and structures at the Trade Fair Complex in Lagos,” the statement said.
The group contended that the actions of the Lagos State government demonstrate a high level of injustice, constitute an economic affront, and are a blatant violation of the rights of traders, who are predominantly of Igbo descent.
Citing multiple legal frameworks, including Section 40 of the 1999 Constitution, the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, the UN Convention on Human Rights, and the foundation of the 1978 Land Use Act, Ohanaeze stressed that any lawful revocation of Rights of Occupancy requires advance notice and just compensation for affected property owners.
The statement further claimed that independent investigations conducted by Ohanaeze indicate the Lagos State government has breached its own Urban and Regional Development Law through these demolitions. Moreover, Ohanaeze alleged a noticeable absence of environmental impact assessments or consultations with stakeholders prior to the demolitions.
While urging Sanwo-Olu to halt these attacks on Igbo properties and investments in Lagos immediately, the group reminded the Governor that the Igbo community overwhelmingly supported him during his 2019 election campaign.
“Since his administration’s commencement, our records reveal that over 2,753 properties – houses, shops, and their valuable contents – have been callously demolished without due recourse to the owners, representing colossal losses amounting to approximately 23 trillion Naira in investments.
“It is incumbent upon us to confront these issues forthrightly, irrespective of any political sensitivities,” it said.
Ohanaeze also called on President Bola Tinubu to intervene in the matter and advocated for the reopening of the Calabar Seaport and other key infrastructure that have been non-operational for 59 years.
Finally, the group encouraged the Igbo community in Lagos to re-evaluate the sustainability of their investments in the state and to seriously explore the option of relocating their businesses to the Old Eastern Region, particularly the Southeast.
“The ‘Think Home’ philosophy (Akụ Ruo Ulo) is increasingly seen as the most viable strategy in response to the ongoing demolitions.
“Standing united, we shall confront these injustices and ardently defend the rights and livelihoods of the Igbo people,” the statement added.
A Rivers High Court sitting in Oyigbo Local Government Area has stepped into the escalating political crisis in the state, issuing an interim injunction that temporarily halts further action on the impeachment process against Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his deputy, Ngozi Nma-Odu.
In a ruling delivered in Port Harcourt, the court restrained the Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, Martin Amaewhule, alongside thirty-two other defendants — including the Clerk of the House and the Chief Judge of Rivers State—from taking steps aimed at advancing the impeachment process.
Specifically, the order barred the Chief Judge, Justice Simeon Chibuzor-Amadi, from receiving, forwarding, considering, or acting on any request, resolution, or impeachment-related document from the Assembly for the purpose of constituting an investigative panel, pending the determination of the matter. The injunction is to subsist for seven days.
In the two suits—marked OYHC/7/CS/2026 and OYHC/6/CS/2026—the court also granted the claimants leave to serve the interim order and other originating processes on the first to the thirty-first defendants by pasting them at the gate of the Rivers State Assembly quarters.
The court also directed that the Chief Judge, listed as the 32nd defendant, be served through any staff of the judiciary at his chambers within the court premises.
Justice Fiberesima thereafter adjourned the matter to January 23, 2026, for hearing of the motion on notice, as the legal battle over the impeachment move shifts from the political arena to the courtroom.
On Friday, the Rivers State House of Assembly had called on the Chief Judge of the state to set up a panel to investigate the allegations of gross misconduct against Governor Fubara and his deputy.
The assembly members, who made the call through a unanimous vote, vowed to continue with the impeachment process.
The lawmakers had earlier addressed a press conference in Port Harcourt, where they accused Fubara of allegedly using blackmail.
Addressing journalists, the deputy speaker, Dumle Maol, claimed Fubara lacked the trust needed to address the crisis rocking the oil-rich state.
They accused the governor of infringing on the 1999 Constitution, saying the parliament was left with no other choice but to apply their legislative power by impeaching him from office.
The lawmakers also claimed the governor and his deputy had resorted to intimidating the parliament.
They, however, thanked President Bola Tinubu for wading into the crisis.
The members also called on the Speaker, Martin Amaewhule, to reconvene the House.
Their position came weeks after they initiated an impeachment process against Fubara and Odu. The lawmakers are accusing them of gross negligence, a move that has heightened political tension in the coastal state.
No amount of intervention or pleading will mitigate the case of Siminalayi Fubara at this stage regarding the determination to impeach him, members of the Rivers State House of Assembly, vowed on Friday, as they opened a new chapter in the ongoing onslaught against the state governor.
Against the backdrop of what appeared like a lull when they failed to sit on Thursday for the same purpose, the members on their return, hinged the blame to go on with the action on the alleged intransigence of Fubara to retrace his step.
For this reason, the called on the state Chief Judge to set up the panel of investigation to look into the allegations of gross misconduct levied against Fubara and his deputy, Ngozi Odu.
Conveying their decision which came in form of a unanimous vote, the assembly members, who vowed to continue with the impeachment process, stressed that no amount of intimidation, blackmail or intervention would stop them this time – the third in the impeachment approach, which was first initiated in November 2023.
Dumle Maol, Deputy Speaker, had earlier told reporters that Fubara lacked the trust needed to address the crisis rocking the oil-rich state, accusing him of multiple infringement on the 1999 Constitution, which left the house with no other choice but to apply their legislative power.
Accusing the governor and his deputy of resorting to intimidation of the parliament, including the dropping of the name of President Bola Tinubu, they thanked the President for wading into the crisis in order to find a solution, but regrated that his efforts were stalled by the same Fubara.
If Peter Obi had mobilised Nigerians against those who rigged him out of the presidential election in 2023, his mandate given to him by the electorate would have been intact and he would have been President today.
This was the contention of Yusuf Datti Baba-Ahmed, who ran with the former Governor of Anambra State, as vice-presidential candidate of the Labour Party (LP) in the 2023 elections, where Obi was the presidential candidate.
Datti-Ahmed, in an interview currently going viral on social media, told his hosts that anyone seeking to defeat President Bola Tinubu must not rely on the court process but resistance, using Nigerians as was done in the June 12, 1993 election saga against the military.
The outing on Nigeria Right Now, uploaded on YouTube on Thursday, quoted the politician, formerly Senator representing Kaduna Central at the National Assembly, as stating that he made this much clear to Obi, that the judiciary could not resolve the fundamental breaches of the constitution perpetrated by the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the last elections.
Hear him: “I told Peter Obi – Supreme Court cannot give you governor and give you presidency. For God’s sake, stand up and do something. The Nigerian Constitution was clearly breached.
“The Nigerian constitution was clearly breached; section 134 2b. It couldn’t be any clearer. Now, if it was June 12 people, and you breached not just the constitution but just one punctuation in their interest, I swear to God, nobody will sleep. They will take it.
“As much as I dislike the fact that they are using the Nigerian constitution, you must give it to them; they fight for their interest. They can organise rallies and can keep it up for three decades. And you are saying, ‘Let’s go to court; let’s go to court.’
“Whoever is going to defeat Tinubu must be ready to, I will use the word, ‘red eye’. You must show your red eyes because on that day that they are declaring the results, the people declaring fake results are criminals, and those who are stopping the declaration of fake results are good citizens. Whoever is going to defeat Tinubu must show red eyes… there’s no going to court.”
In the 2003 Anambra governorship election, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) declared Chris Ngige of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) the winner, but Obi, candidate of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA), challenged the result and was later affirmed governor by the court of appeal in March 2006.
Similarly, in 2023, Obi challenged Tinubu’s victory, the APC presidential candidate, but his appeal was dismissed up to the supreme court level.
Court halts move to impeach Fubara *Orders CJ to tarry on panel
Impeachment: Do your job, Rivers assembly tells CJ *Insist Fubara must go
Rigging: I warned Obi that judicial option in 2023 won’t work – Datti
-
News3 weeks agoBREAKING: Trump begins attacks on Nigeria! *Bombs targets in Sokoto
-
News3 weeks agoOgala saga: She’s not my daughter – embattled Pastor *VDM will pay heavily
-
News3 weeks agoSeven journalist perish in another auto crash after Anthony Joshua’s tragedy!
-
News2 weeks agoLunch in Paris: Nigeria is burning, you’re editing photos, Atiku mocks Tinubu
-
News3 weeks agoWith Tinubu’s nod, we provided intelligence for US strike – FG
-
News2 weeks agoOsimhen’s spat with Lookman dims Nigeria’s 4-0 trashing of Mozambique
-
News3 weeks agoNigeria in distress: Only The Mike Adenuga spirit can heal the land
-
News3 weeks agoKalu to Otti: No Tinubu, no 2nd term! Only defection to APC will save you!