Connect with us

News

Court threatens bench warrant against senator Andy Uba

Published

on

A Federal High Court in Abuja has warned Senator Andy Uba of a potential bench warrant if he fails to appear in court on October 28 to address a criminal charge against him.

Uba, alongside Benjamin Etu, faces allegations of fraud involving N400 million, with the charge filed in the name of the Inspector General of Police (IGP).

Advertisement


On Wednesday, Justice Mohammed Umar issued the warning after Uba’s lawyer, C.F. Odiniru, requested additional time for his client to attend the court in person.

The judge’s warning came in response to a motion by the prosecution lawyer, Aminu Abdullahi, who sought a bench warrant against Uba under Section 394 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), 2015, citing Uba’s repeated absence from court proceedings.

READ ALSO: Umahi: ₦3.6trn needed to save third Mainlandy bridge from underwater threat

Advertisement


When the case was called on Wednesday, Etu appeared in the dock, but Uba was absent, prompting the court to inquire about his whereabouts.

Odiniru apologized, explaining that Uba was unable to attend due to health issues.

Abdullahi, however, raised concerns about Uba’s consistent absence, noting that a similar excuse was given during the previous hearing in July.

Advertisement


“On the last date, we reluctantly accepted, and the matter was adjourned. And today the same reason was advanced.

“My lord, we cannot fold our arms and continue this way. We will be applying for a bench warrant under Section 394 of ACJA, 2015, against the 1st defendant,” Abdullahi stated.

He argued that Uba’s repeated absence showed disrespect to the court and hindered the progress of the trial, pointing out that Uba had not appeared in court since the charge was filed in 2024.

Advertisement


Odiniru opposed the prosecution’s request for a bench warrant, stating, “We are opposing this application because consistently before the court, we have informed the court that the 1st defendant is ill and out of the country.”

He claimed Uba was receiving medical treatment in a U.S. hospital and said he had provided Abdullahi with documents verifying Uba’s condition prior to the court session, as directed during the last hearing.

“I told him (Abdullahi) and showed him the documents. These applications for a bench warrant, my lord, are made for an absconding suspect, and not for a person like the 1st defendant.

Advertisement


“Section 37 of ACJA says if you are interested in a bench warrant, you should go by oath,” Odiniru argued.

The judge responded rhetorically, asking, “So what you are saying is that we are going to remain this way even if it will take 10 years?

“Have you seen where a person has been brought to court on a stretcher?”

Advertisement


Odiniru suggested that the prosecution could verify the authenticity of his claims about Uba’s health.

Abdullahi, however, refuted Odiniru’s assertion, stating that no documents regarding Uba’s health were provided to him.

“He is just reprobating and approbating to my lord,” Abdullahi said.

Advertisement


“He (Odiniru) didn’t make any attempt to call me for anything, my lord, because he knows that what he is holding is not acceptable,” he added, urging the court to issue the bench warrant.

Justice Umar gave Odiniru a final chance, stating, “I will give you the last opportunity,” and instructed him to ensure Uba’s presence at the next hearing.

The case was adjourned to October 28 for a plea.

Advertisement


On July 7, the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) authorized the IGP to prosecute Uba and Etu. The prosecution amended a two-count charge on March 5, initially filed against Uba and others before Justice Inyang Ekwo.

In the original charge (FHC/ABJ/CR/538/2024), Uba, a former senator for Anambra South, was named alongside Crystal Uba and Benjamin Etu. However, in the amended charge filed on March 4 by Abdulrashid Sidi of the Police Force Headquarters’ Legal/Prosecution Section, Crystal Uba’s name was removed, leaving Uba and Etu as the first and second defendants.

In the first count, Uba, Etu, and Hajiya Fatima (currently at large) were alleged to have conspired in 2022 to commit the offense.

Advertisement


They were accused of defrauding Mr. George Uboh by falsely claiming they could secure the appointment of the Managing Director of the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) for anyone willing to pay N400 million.

“A presentation which you know is not true and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 8 and punishable under Section 1 (3) of the Advance Fee Fraud and other Fraud Related offences Act, 2006.”

The prosecution stated that the offense violated Section 1(2) and is punishable under Section 1(3) of the same Act.

Advertisement


In a letter dated April 5, 2023, to the IGP, Uboh claimed his petition was supported by compelling documentary and audio evidence, describing it as “overwhelming and irrefutable.”

At least six witnesses are set to testify against Uba and Etu.

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

ADC spits fire! Demands arrest of Lifu *Says, Abuja judge, playing with fire!  

Published

on

“He is running in contempt of the court. Justice Lifu should be arrested because he is acting in contempt of the court which is a criminal act,” were the exact words with which the African Democratic Congress (ADC), demonstrated its angst over the court ruling on Monday, ordering its de-registration as a political party in Nigeria.

A furious Bolaji Abdullahi, spokesman of the party, told his host while appearing as a guest on Monday’s edition of Politics Today, a public affairs programme on Channels Television that the judge of the Abuja Federal High Court who gave the order was actually playing with fire because of the consequences.

Advertisement


Directly accusing him of playing the script of the All Progressives Congress (APC), to ensure that President Bola Tinubu emerged the sole candidate for the 2027 presidential election, the party spokesman, was emphatic that the plan would not work, as head or tail, ADC must be on the ballot in all the elections.

Hear him: “There is a Court of Appeal order saying don’t hear this case until October 27. So, on what basis? You can’t place something on nothing. The Court of Appeal said don’t act on this until I hear it on October 27. So, on what basis did he deliver the judgement

“So, for us in the African Democratic Congress, what we’re convinced and they know is what they have done has no leg to stand on legally. What they want to do is to create doubts in the minds of the people that this ADC has too many legal cases, can we actually run on this? And to distract us. But we’re not distracted.

Advertisement


“We’re very clear. It was in spite of all they have done since ADC came on board that we ran one of the best and one of the most comprehensive direct primaries in the history of democracy in Nigeria. So, we are strong enough to withstand this. And that’s why I’m saying that we are going to contest in 2027. We’re ADC. We don’t buckle before dictatorship.”

Stressing on the implication of the judgement, which also affected Accord Party (AP), Action Peoples Party (APP), Action Alliance (AA), and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP) for allegedly failing to meet constitutional and electoral performance requirements, following a suit by the National Forum of Former Legislators, he said it portended grave danger.

He added: “We are not surprised. We know that the Nigerian people believe that there is a problem with the judiciary, but what we did not expect is the level of judicial rascality that was demonstrated today.

Advertisement


“What we are saying is that we reject it in its totality, and we are saying that the people behind this are playing with fire. Hundreds, if not thousands, have obtained nomination forms and contested elections and emerged as candidates on the platform of the ADC.”

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

News

Deregistration of ADC: Don’t destroy democracy, Obi warns judiciary

Published

on

Peter Obi, candidate of the Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC), in the 2027 presidential election, is peeved at the decision of the Federal High Court, Abuja, ordering the de-registration of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), saying the move is a heavy blow and dangerous to Nigeria’s democracy.

Justice Peter Lifu, who made the order, based on an action brought by National Forum of Former Legislators, agreed that the parties, including Accord Party (AP), Action Peoples Party (APP), Action Alliance (AA), and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP), failed to meet the requirement for continued existence in Nigeria.

Advertisement


But Obi, who left the ADC coalition to join the NDC, incidentally, based on what he explained resulted from the multiple court cases hanging on its neck, expressed his disenchantment, in a statement by the Peter Obi Media Reach (POMR), on Monday.

Signed by Ibrahim Umar, its spokesman, the group quoted the former Governor of Anambra State as decrying the growing damage to the nation’s sacred institutions on the altar of politics.

Stressing that the rise of nations depended on stronger institutions devoid of political influences, the 2023 Labour Party presidential candidate, wrote on his X platform: “When the controversy surrounding the removal of the former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Walter Onnoghen, unfolded, I expressed a concern to a friend: that the greatest damage might not be immediate, but the message it sends about the sanctity and independence of our institutions to the world.

Advertisement


“Strong economies are built on trust. Investors can manage security risks, policy risks, and even market risks. What they fear most is uncertainty in the rule of law and a judiciary that is perceived to be vulnerable to political pressure.

“Today, many Nigerians have lost confidence in systems that should protect them. Businesses increasingly request that their contracts be governed by foreign jurisdictions because they have greater confidence in those institutions than in our own. That should concern every patriot.

“We must never sacrifice our sacred institutions on the altar of politics. Nations rise when institutions are stronger than individuals. The Federal High Court judgment ordering the deregistration of the ADC and other political parties is just one of those activities that further reduces the common man’s trust in our legal systems. It should be reversed.

Advertisement


“I pledge that we will restore the dignity, independence, and integrity of the judiciary. The common man must have a voice. The business community must be protected from legal uncertainty and intimidation. Justice must be impartial, accessible, and respected by all. To our judges, legal luminaries, senior advocates, and lawyers: this is your moment. Rise, defend the rule of law, take back your country! A new Nigeria is POssible.”

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

News

Cape Verde stuns global pundits with barren draw against Spain

Published

on

Not even Lamine Yamal’s second half introduction could help Spain break through the defence of debutants, Cape Verde, in their first ever meeting, as the ongoing World Cup event produced another one of the stunning results on Monday.

Yamal, the Barcelona superstar just recovering from a near two-month hamstring injury, was brought into the game in the second half to zest up the one-time world champion, but failed to break down the Cape Verde’s dogged defence.

Advertisement


Spain’s in the game played in Atlanta, one of the cities hosting the three-nation Mundial, displayed the same dismal outing, which saw them offering far less than the quality, which saw them lifting the trophy for the first time in 2010.

The European champions, which have not won a knockout game ever since, failed to dominate the African side, replicating their less than impressing outings and their eventual exit in 2018 and 2022 editions, even with the claims of coach Luis de la Fuente that the squad was the best in the competition, Spain were considered among the pre-tournament.

Neither Yamal nor Nico Williams, who also was hit by an injury-disrupted season at Athletic Bilbao and was not introduced until the 87th minute, were able to rise to the occasion against the 500,000 people African side, ranked 67 in the world, which is making their debut on the global stage.

Advertisement


In stark contrast to the searing temperatures faced by some other sides, Atlanta’s state-of-the-art air conditioned stadium meant there was no excuses for the slow tempo of Spain’s build-up.

Indeed the mid-half hydration break was met by boos with fans frustrated at the break in play despite the cool conditions.

The only serious move from the European champions only came at the  sixth minute to half-time, when Marc Cucurella, fresh for sealing his move from Chelsea to Real Madrid, sent over a teasing cross that Ferran Torres turned onto the crossbar and Cabo Verde goalkeeper Vozinha got back on his feet to turn Mikel Oyarzabal’s looping header over the bar.

Advertisement


Even after the break, the Blue Sharks, were also able to hold back from the onslaught as they did in the first half, where Vozinho, managed to make another superlative save against Aymeric Laporte’s header just before half-time.

Despite the excitement from the crowd after he was introduced, Yamal, billed as one of the stars of the tournament, failed to create any magic with his first touch being the set-up of a decent opening for fellow substitute Mikel Merino which was too close to Vozinha.

In fact, Cabo Verde billed to take on Uruguay in Miami, nearly snatched a famous victory in the final minute of the 90 when Dani Borges planted a header too close to Unai Simon, who saved the occasion, to prevent the former world champions, billed to face Saudi Arabia in Atlanta on Sunday from humiliation.

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024. WhirlwindNews