Babajide Sanwo-Olu, Governor of Lagos State, on Sunday fired volleys of attacks towards Peter Obi, presidential candidate of Labour Party (LP) in the 2023 general election, claiming the former Anambra State governor was nowhere near President Bola Tinubu, either as a governor now would he do better as President.
Obi, who assumed office in 2006, and met Tinubu as governor of five years ahead, having started in 1999, also squared up with the Lagos State Governor, at the 2023 presidential polls, with the latter declared winner and currently in office as incumbent.
However, Obi, who eventually defeated Tinubu in Lagos in the February 23, 2023 presidential election, but lost at the general polls, has remained on the case of the President, in recent times, either attacking him for abandoning the ship of state to hole up in France, or for unleashing poverty in the land.
But it was the attack from the LP chieftain in far away John Hopkins University in the United States on Wednesday that seemed to have roused, Sanwo-Olu, the third governor to succeed Tinubu in Lagos, as he accused the former Anambra Governor of misfiring about Nigeria before the rest of the world.
Obi, at the prestigious institution, had compared Nigeria, China and Vietnam, lamenting that the nation had remained at a sorry state, in the face of the two others it was favourably ahead of at a point in history, in just a few years ago, wondering how Nigeria with about 50 million poor people, and the least number of people in poverty in 1990, would now soar above them in just about three decades:
Hear him: “The question then is, what exactly did these countries do to be able to achieve the desired growth and development? That is where political leadership comes in.
“These comparable nations, and, indeed, other progressive nations, unlike Nigeria, have competent leadership with character, capacity and compassion, committed to prioritising investment in critical areas of developmental measures: education, health, and pulling people out of poverty.”
But Sanwo-Olu, also said to be in the US at the same time, but at Harvard University, where he delivered a speech, urging foreigners that Nigeria remained a viable investment destination, citing the robust economic environment in Lagos as example, carpeted the LP boss for demarketing his country.
In a statement he personally signed, an obviously incensed Sanwo-Olu, wrote on Obi: “He made unflattering remarks not just about the incumbent Nigerian government, but also about Nigeria. I also find Mr. Obi’s pattern of behaviour disturbing. When prominent Nigerians go overseas, they ought to project Nigeria positively.
“They do not have to do that for the government. But we all owe a duty to market Nigeria on the global stage rather than de-market her. That is what true patriotism is about.”
Dwelling on the issue which Obi raised in his treatise, Sanwo-Olu, questioned his competence for going that route, given his disastrous outing in Anambra, where poverty rose throughout his period as governor for eight years, adding that any leader who could fight poverty generationally by promoting education, improving healthcare, providing credit, and granting access to land, was unfit to speak on bettering the lots of the masses.
Hear him: “Now, I find it somewhat ironic that a man like Mr. Obi, who did not build a single school or a stand-alone hospital throughout his eight-year tenure as governor of Anambra or sustainably provide credit facilities, would criticise the government of Nigeria, which is actively doing that.
“I say this because the President of Nigeria, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, is my predecessor, and as governor of Lagos and now President of Nigeria, has built over 200 schools and provided student loans to more than 200,000 undergraduates of Nigerian tertiary institutions.
“In less than two years, he has provided over half a billion dollars in credit facilities to small and medium-scale enterprises. While he was governor of Lagos State between 1999 and 2007, Tinubu reduced poverty by more than 46 per cent, and there is every reason to believe that based on what he did as governor of Lagos, he will repeat the same feat at the federal level. After all, the best predictor of the future is the past.
“But let us examine the messenger, not just the message, and look at the issuer as well as the issues. Mr. Obi talks a good game. But was he able to reduce poverty while he governed Anambra? Perhaps we can let the facts speak for themselves.
“Under Peter Obi as a two term Anambra Governor, poverty in Anambra increased. It did not reduce. Before Peter Obi became Anambra Governor on Thursday, June 14, 2007, the poverty rate in Anambra was 41.4 per cent.
“But after only two years in office, the poverty rate in Anambra jumped to 53.7 per cent. But the interesting thing is that five years after Peter Obi left office, his successor, Willie Obiano, reduced the poverty rate in Anambra from almost 60 per cent to 14.8 per cent.
“As such, I am not sure that Mr. Obi is morally well placed to make the alarming claims he made about Nigeria at Johns Hopkins. Mr. Obi contributed to the increase in poverty in Nigeria. Governor Tinubu, as he then was, was responsible for lifting millions out of poverty. Being that that is the case, who should criticise who?”