Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Senator, representing Kogi Central at the National Assembly, on Monday demanded her reinstatement to the Senate on the grounds that she has apologised as directed by the Senate.
Akpotii-Uduaghan, one of the four female Senators at the 10th Senate, was axed on March 6 for unruly behaviour during plenary after she flatly refused to take the seat where she was reassigned, thus raising a raucous on the floor while confronting Godswill Akpabio, Senate President.
After accepting the report of the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Code of Conducts headed by Neda Imesuen, which investigated her case, the Senate had reeled out a set of measures against the Kogi Senator for the infraction.
Apart from her suspension for six months, the Senate had announced that her office would locked during this period, and she will have no access to the National Assembly’s premises over the span of her suspension, while her salaries and those of her legislative aides would also be suspended as well.
However, the upper legislative chamber of the NASS, in a unanimous decision, stated that the Senator could only mitigate her situation through an appeal, which could only come if she tendered a written apology to the Senate for violating its rules.
Victor Giwa, lawyer to the Kogi Senator, on Monday, while appearing on Kakaaki, a breakfast programme on African Independent Television (AIT), said Akpoti-Uduaghan, had fulfilled the condition for her recall, having fully apologised, saying however it was viewed by anyone, an apology remained an apology.
Giwa was referring to the letter Akpoti-Uduaghan, before her suspension, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Diaspora and NGOs, wrote to Akpabio on Sunday, where she inferred that she regretted” calling him out for harassing her sexually.
In the said letter dripping with innuendoes, ironies and even mockery, the Senator had written: “How remiss of me not to understand that my refusal to indulge your… ‘requests’ was not merely a personal choice but a constitutional violation of certain men’s entitlement.
“Please find it in your magnanimous heart — somewhere buried deep beneath layers of entitlement — to forgive this stubborn woman who mistakenly believed that her seat in the Senate was earned through elections, not erections.”
Giwa, while stressing that the letter sufficed for an apology, argued that since the Senate that took the decision on Akpoti-Uduaghan, never stated the shape it would take, the Senator had decided how best to present it.
“It is an apology. The Senate expected her to make an apology and that apology she has made. There was no condition attached to the apology as requested by the Senate. Having written that apology, it will be interest of peace and reconciliation to accept the apology.
“There was no condition attached to the apology. She has just apologised to the Senate President. There was no condition to the kind of apology she should make and I think the Senate should accept that apology whole-heartedly and recall her so that we can rest this whole issue of suspension.”