Connect with us

News

Dangote Petrol Pricing: NNPC’s dance of deception

Published

on

By Ifeanyi Izeze
We all dream of a better Nigeria, but instead, we are dragged into an endless labyrinth where a privileged few find joy in our collective suffering. It is now glaringly evident that either the Federal Government or NNPC Limited—or perhaps both—are not being entirely truthful about their public spat with the Dangote Refinery. What we witness today is a disgraceful dance of deception.
Why is it that honesty and efficiency have always been strangers to NNPC? Let’s trace the roots of this saga. When former President Muhammadu Buhari commissioned the Dangote Refinery, it was a moment of national celebration. We rejoiced at the thought of locally refined fuel, heralding the end of skyrocketing prices. But soon after, whispers began. Under the new administration of Bola Tinubu, NNPC’s stake in the refinery was reportedly being reduced, despite earlier assurances of a significant investment. From there, rumors of a complete divestment emerged.
As Dangote’s refinery began to produce diesel, what should have been a moment of triumph turned into another chapter in this twisted tale. Suddenly, NNPC and other regulatory bodies, particularly the Nigerian Midstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NMPRC), attacked Dangote, claiming his diesel was substandard and unfit for domestic consumption. The government accused Dangote of foreign exchange violations, raided his refinery, and refused him access to crude oil. Dangote, forced to look elsewhere, had to import crude from the United States. In the midst of these power plays, accusations flew that Dangote’s product quality was subpar.
Trapped in this web, Dangote fought back. In a dramatic revelation, sympathisers exposed Tinubu’s Malta-based refinery and its dubious dealings. What followed was a flurry of denials and threats against anyone who dared speak out, including myself. The drama then shifted to pricing, with NNPC insisting Dangote must purchase crude in dollars, under the guise of global norms. Dangote cried foul, and we rallied in support. Only then did the government agree to allow payment in Naira, but only starting from October 1st.
And then, as the refinery was about to release petrol to the Nigerian market, the government made its move. It unveiled an inflated price template for petrol across the nation, pressuring Dangote to sell at higher prices. This move guaranteed NNPC a profit margin when it resumed importing fuel, sacrificing consumers’ interests on the altar of corruption and incompetence. Furthermore, the government prohibited Dangote from selling directly to marketers, making NNPC the sole off-taker of petrol. Dangote was thus caged, not permitted to set his price or sell directly—a calculated ploy to entrap him.
The strategy was twofold: first, to tarnish the refinery’s reputation with allegations of poor quality, and second, to manipulate pricing, driving up the cost of fuel. They claimed to protect Nigerians from potential extortion by Dangote while plotting to blame him for the inflated prices. But Dangote saw through the trap and swiftly launched a media campaign to educate the public. He clarified that while he controlled the quality of his product, pricing was dictated by NNPC.
The question we must ask is: where is Nigeria’s Petroleum Minister in all this? Why has President Tinubu, who also serves as Petroleum Minister, remained silent in this sordid affair? The truth is clear: the Dangote Refinery is a thorn in the side of those who refine Nigerian crude in foreign lands and import it back, collecting subsidies along the way. They seek to bend Dangote to their will or coerce him into maintaining the corrupt status quo.
The essence of this conflict lies in appropriate pricing, breaking the grip of oil cartels, and ending the fraudulent subsidy regime that bleeds the nation. It is a battle to reclaim Nigeria’s oil and gas sector from the clutches of an unscrupulous cabal. Dangote Refinery blindsided them, and they are now fighting tooth and nail to preserve their interests.
The harassments of labor leaders by the government may not be unrelated to this oil war. It is about control, power, and the right to dictate Nigeria’s oil future. Amidst all this chaos, Tinubu remains silent, leaving the nation in turmoil.
How do we explain the absurdity where NNPC Retail, after acquiring Oando’s assets for $324 million, dissolves and hands over control to OVH, Oando’s parent company? Today, NNPC, through Oando, is the sole buyer of Dangote’s petrol and dictates its price across the nation. Is it not clear who truly benefits from this charade?
The real victor in this shameful dance is Tinubu, the petroleum minister and de facto controller of Oando/OVH. The losers, as always, are Nigerians, who are being led down this dark path.
Izeze writes from Abuja and can be reached at iizeze@yahoo.com or +234 (0) 803 304 3009.

Share this story:

News

BREAKING! Appeal Court halts Atiku! Says, Mark can’t be ADC Chairman!

Published

on

Atiku Abubakar seventh attempt at the presidency has been halted by the Court of Appeal in Abuja, which held that David Mark is not the fit and proper person to assume the position of the National Chairman of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) – the camp that produced the former Vice President as candidate of the party.

Hours after the former VP, who had attempted the bid for the nation’s number one job and is on the seventh edition by virtue of his nomination for the 2027 presidential election by the Mark, agreed with the position of the Federal High Court, Abuja, restraining the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from recognising or participating in any state congresses organised by the former Senate President.

Advertisement


Justice Okon Abang, while reading the lead-judgement in the three-to-one split, said there was no reason for the appellate court to set aside the April 29 order by the lower court, adding that Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, who barred Mark and his executives from interfering with the tenure and functions of the party’s elected state executives, was in order.

Agreeing that the responsibility for conducting state congresses of political parties rested with elected state executive committees and not with the national leadership, he ordered INEC not to recognise the executive produced as a result of the defective process.

Though his position was echoed by Donatus Okorowo in the majority, Justice Abba Mohammed, who disagreed sharply, with a dissenting judgment, held that the case that precipitated the restraining order bordered on a non-justiciable internal affair of a political party, adding that lower court was wrong to have assumed jurisdiction to entertain the matter.

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

News

Lest we forget: Ibom Deep Seaport and Senator Godswill Akpabio — A prophecy foretold?

Published

on

By Ken Harries Esq

Some speeches disappear with the applause that greets them. Others acquire greater force with the passing of time. Their words do not change; history simply grows into them. Years later, they resonate with fresh power, not because they have been rewritten, but because the nation has finally arrived at the realities they foresaw.
One such speech was delivered in April 2012 at the 2nd South South Economic Summit in Asaba. There, Senator Godswill Akpabio, then Governor of Akwa Ibom State, presented what many regarded as an ambitious vision for maritime corridor and blue economy development.

Advertisement


Speaking before political leaders, investors, and development stakeholders at the 2nd South South Economic Summit in Asaba, Akpabio outlined what many regarded as an ambitious vision for a model state in particular and regional development in general. Long before the Ibom Deep Seaport became a national priority, he argued that Nigeria needed new maritime gateways, integrated industrial clusters, aviation maintenance facilities, and modern logistics infrastructure to unlock economic growth. His vision was not simply about building a port; it was about creating an economic ecosystem capable of transforming a region and strengthening the nation’s competitiveness.

Fourteen years later, those remarks read less like political advocacy and more like an economic blueprint whose underlying logic has steadily been vindicated by events and times. Looking back today, his address appears almost prophetic—not because it predicted the future in mystical terms, but because Nigeria has gradually grown into the ideas it contained.

Truly visionary speeches never fade; they gather strength with time. This one deserves renewed attention, not because every prediction has materialised exactly as envisioned, but because it reveals a quality increasingly scarce in public leadership: the ability to think beyond electoral cycles.
Nigeria has never lacked projects. What it has often lacked are leaders willing to imagine the infrastructure of tomorrow while grappling with the demands of today. Akpabio’s vision was shaped by precisely that instinct.

Advertisement


At a time when public discourse was largely focused on roads and recurrent expenditure, he spoke instead of logistics corridors, industrial ecosystems, aviation maintenance, manufacturing clusters, export processing zones, maritime and blue economy opportunities, and security reform—not as isolated initiatives, but as interconnected pillars of national competitiveness.

His vision for the then proposed Ibaka Deep Seaport, now known as the Ibom Deep Seaport, best illustrates this broader philosophy. Rather than presenting it as another state prestige project, he framed it as a strategic response to structural inefficiencies in Nigeria’s maritime sector and the wider economy. He argued that the Lagos ports were already burdened by severe congestion, with vessels waiting for extended periods to berth, driving up costs, disrupting supply chains, and delaying the delivery of critical imports, including pharmaceuticals.

His objective, however, was never to rival Lagos, but to complement it. The distinction is fundamental. No major trading nation concentrates all its strategic maritime infrastructure within a single corridor. Successful economies spread capacity, ease bottlenecks, and create multiple gateways through which commerce can flow efficiently. Nigeria has long recognised this principle in policy documents; Akpabio was among the few public leaders articulating it so clearly more than a decade ago.

Advertisement


Equally significant was his emphasis on geography. He reminded his audience that Ibaka possessed a naturally deep coastline requiring little or no dredging, with water depths of approximately fifteen to seventeen metres. According to his account, the location had been identified as suitable for a deep seaport as far back as 1963, yet decades passed without meaningful progress. His observation that “being a minority area, there was nobody to push it” reflected a broader concern that strategic national investments have too often been influenced by political considerations rather than economic merit.

Whether one agrees entirely with that assessment is, in many respects, secondary. The larger point is that Akpabio consistently argued that national infrastructure should be driven by economic logic, strategic necessity, and long-term national interest rather than sentiment or political convenience. More than a decade later, that remains a lesson Nigeria is still striving to learn.

Yet, to see the 2012 Asaba address merely as a speech about a deep seaport is to miss its larger significance. The Ibom Deep Seaport was never presented as an end in itself. It was conceived as the anchor of a much broader economic ecosystem—a platform around which industries, manufacturing, aviation, logistics, free trade, and investment could flourish.

Advertisement


Akpabio envisioned the acquisition of about 14,000 hectares of land to support a self-sustaining industrial city comprising fertiliser and ammonia plants, refining capacity, manufacturing facilities, and a Free Trade Zone. What development economists today describe as industrial clustering was already embedded in his thinking. The port was simply the gateway.

That broader vision deserves a discussion of its own. Today, Ibom Deep Seaport in that Asaba Speech has berthed.

•Ken Harries Esq is an Abuja-based Development Communication Strategist.

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

News

Forgery: Nnaji, ex-Minister, regains freedom *Barred from leaving Nigeria!

Published

on

Justice Joyce Abdulmalik of the Federal High Court in Abuja, on Monday, granted allowed Uche Nnaji former Minister of Science and Technology, to go home, on the condition of a N20million bail bond.

Nnaji, who was arrested at Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport (NAIA), Abuja on July 1 by officials of the Independent Corrupt Practices and other Offences Commission (ICPC), while returning to Abuja, was granted bail after pleading not guilty to a six-count certificate forgery charge.

Advertisement


The anti-corruption agency alleged that Nnaji, Minister of Science and Technology between August 16, 2023 and October 6, 2025, when he resigned office after a crisis regarding his university degree broke out is currently the governorship candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Enugu for in the 2027 general election, squaring up against Peter Mba, the incumbent, who incidentally won his office in 2023 under the same PDP, before defecting to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

He was accused of forging his academic credentials, especially a degree certificate from the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN) alongside presenting a bogus National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) discharge certificate during his ministerial screening process in 2023.

At the proceedings on Monday, the former Minister pleaded not guilty to the charges, and following an application by James Onoja (SAN), his lawyer, was granted to bail in the sum of N20 million with one surety in the like sum, who must also be a civil servant resident in Abuja, not be below grade level 15.

Advertisement


The court, which ordered the surety to depose to an affidavit of means, mandated the former Minister to also surrender his international passport and not travel outside the country without permission, while fixing September 21 for the commencement of the trial.

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024. WhirlwindNews