To Matthew Hassan-Kukah, Bishop of the Catholic Diocese of Sokoto, not signing the peace accord during elections does not carry any compulsive consequences because the Nigerian Peace Committee (NPC), lacked the powers to force anyone to adopt it outside the moral obligations, which could have a telling effect on candidates.
Kukah, one of the conveners of the NPC, led by Abdulsalami Abubakar, former Nigeria’s military Head of State, while appearing in a townhall meeting organised by Channels Television, on Sunday that the only consequence of failure of political parties and their candidates to sign the documents, meant to persuade them to shun electoral violence, was only because it could send a wrong signal to Nigerians.
Citing an example with the 2023 presidential election, Kukah, who is also a prominent social critic argued that despite not signing the document as candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Bola Tinubu still became President, though he equally blamed the opposing political parties for not making political capital out of the development.
The television network, held the meeting tagged: Edo Election Security Townhall, as a precursor to the September 21 governorship election in the state, in partnership with the Kimpact Development Initiative and the UK International Development.
Though 17 political parties are fielding candidates in the September 21, 2024, Governorship Election in Edo State like the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Labour Party (LP), among others, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) shunned the pre-election ritual last week over some allegations levelled against the police.
Advancing his argument on the raison d’etre of the initiative the cleric, who said there was no way the committee could force any candidate to sign the peace pact which has become an electoral ritual in the last decade, added: “The National Peace Committee, what we do is not in the Electoral Act, it’s not law; it’s moral.
“You can’t compel people to fall in love or love their neighbour. If you go back to the 2015 election, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar the presidential candidate for the PDP, was not there to sign the Peace Accord. And of course, the opposition went to town, which is what it ought to be, and the next day, he (Atiku) turned up to sign.
“What is also very interesting is that the current president, when he was a presidential candidate, did not sign; it wasn’t our fault that the political opposition didn’t take advantage of it. It’s a pity but we are not going to take anybody to court for not signing the Peace Accord. The only thing it does to you as a candidate is that it sends a wrong signal which can be very easily exploited by the opposition.”
The cleric had spoken against the backdrop of the refusal of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), making good its threat not to sign the document after Godwin Obaseki, gave the immediate release of members of the party, allegedly arrested by the police as a condition for the party to ink the document.
Abdulsalami Abubakar, Nigeria’s former military Head of State, who brokered the transition that led to the return of civilian rule in 1999, said on Thursday at the venue of the signing ceremony in Benin that the ruling party in the state, had declined to sign the document.
He told his audience, which included representatives of the political parties contesting the election, including PDP: “As you must have seen in the media, I met the Governor (Godwin Obaseki) yesterday and he told me that the PDP is not going to sign this peace accord.
“They have made some observations and I was expecting the Chairman of the PDP to come and make that statement. Having waited for him this long, it is just to announce that the PDP said they are not going to sign. The PDP said it will only sign the peace accord if certain conditions are met.”