For the umpteenth time, Nigerians were almost unanimous on Sunday, in their continued quest for mandatory electronic transmission of results to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Portal (IReV) in subsequent elections in the country, particularly that of the forthcoming general polls in 2027.
This formed the fulcrum of engagements at the national debate over the Electoral Act 2026, recently signed into law, where but for the All Progressives Congress (APC), Nigeria’s ruling party and opposition groups and Civil Society Organisations (CSOs), were unanimous in demanding for the process.
At the Citizens’ Townhall parley on Sunday, broadcast live on Channels Television, where stakeholders interrogated the new 2026 Electoral Act, passed by the National Assembly and assented to by President Bola Tinubu, various speakers believed that without the provision made total without any proviso, was akin to returning Nigeria to the dark ages of huge electoral malfeasance.
Themed: Electoral Act 2026: What It Means for Your Vote and The 2027 Elections, Joash Amupitan, Chairman of INEC, who identifying network inadequacy as a primary challenge, emphasised that the quality of an election is inherently linked to logistical capacity.
Dwelling on the hiccups of elections in Nigeria, the INEC boss who assured that the technical glitches that marred the 2023 presidential polls had been eliminated, told his audience: “I don’t see the issue of transmission as a problem; the problem is not the network but the adequacy of the networks we have. Nigeria might not achieve “100 per cent perfect elections for now. But the Commission is striving to deliver the best possible outcome.
“The glitch is eliminated; by God’s grace, it will not surface in Nigeria. INEC will conduct a mock presidential election to stress-test the transmission architecture. One of the things we are trying to do before the election is to have a mock presidential election so that we are sure that this transmission across the states must not fail.”
But Samson Itodo, Executive Director of Yiaga Africa, leading the CSOs, who joined issues with the INEC, assailed NASS for option to include a proviso to in the process that tended towards manual transmission as an option, arguing that electronic transmission must be the sole, real-time method for results to ensure credibility.
His words: “And as we approach 2027, the credibility of that election will not just be determined on election day. It will be determined by a few things: the quality of preparations, the transparency of resource management, the professionalism of election officials, how political actors restrain themselves, but more importantly, the independence and the integrity of our security agencies and the judiciary.
“And lastly, the vigilance of citizens is what will determine the credibility of the next elections, because democracy is not self-executing. It requires guardians, and the citizens of this great country are the guardians that we need.”
For Okechukwu Ibeanu and Oluwole Osaze-Uzzi, former Commissioners at INEC, who agreed with Itodo, there was no basis for resort to manual system, which was akin to the Incidence Form, INEC had adopted in the past as a fallback option, which eventually dominated the process, warning that the issue of no network would similarly would become a major feature in future elections.
Ibeanu said: “I think there are still gaps and loopholes in the law, and it’s unfortunate that it took us debating about a proviso for the country to come to a consensus that electronic transmission was actually in the 2022 act.
“But what we have done is actually to take us far back to 2018… We consistently tinker with the electoral legal framework as if that holds all the answers to our electoral problems. Citizens, this is about you. It is not about politicians; it is not about INEC. Except citizens are in a position to protect their votes and control those who ostensibly represent them, our dream of a truly democratic country will remain an illusion.”
Osaze-Uzi, former Director of Voter Education at INEC, who was more emphatic that the new Electoral Act had returned Nigeria back with the proviso on manual collation, asked his audience: “Who is the judge when there is a network failure? Is it the electoral officer?”
Oluwadara Oluwalana, Head of Information Communication Technology (ICT) at the Nigerian Society of Engineers (NSE), maintained the position of the body that Nigeria had the capacity to try out technology in the 2027 polls, with the collaboration of operators, saying: “Yes, I believe telecom operators can come together and make it work. I think we have the capacity now.”
Chidi Nwafor, until 2023, Director ICT at INEC, who confirmed being instrumental to the creation of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) and IReV, blamed the judiciary for ignoring the intent of INEC in coming up with the two devices as a foolproof mechanism for electoral process in the country, warning that what happened in the 2023 election, must not be repeated in 2027.