Mike Igini, former Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC), on Wednesday pleaded with President Bola Tinubu not to sign the contentious Electoral Act (Repeal and Re-Enactment) Bill 2026, concluded by the National Assembly on Tuesday.
Less than 24 hours after the federal lawmakers – the House of Representatives and the Senate concluded work on the new set of laws, Igini, one of the most outspoken INEC officials during his time, told the President that the document due for his assent, was fraught with danger that could sink the nail on the head of Nigerian democracy.
A guest of The Morning Show, a breakfast programme on ARISE NEWS Television, Igini who described the document as “a recipe for chaos that could undermine Nigeria’s democracy, particularly slammed the lawmakers for their stance on the new law, particularly as it concerned the Clause 60 (3), which spoke on real-time transmission of results during elections.
The House of Representatives members, who had earlier passed a version for a wholesome transmission, recanted on Tuesday to adopt the Senate version which gave room to a proviso instead of absolute terms.
Denouncing the provision, which stated that electoral officials could resort to manual result sheets instead of making it mandatory for result to be transmitted to the INEC Result Viewing Portal (IReV), Igini argued that the proviso gave room for total anarchy as it took the country back to the era of INEC Incident Forms.
Hear him: “It is indeed my humble recommendation to Mr President that you are a man of history. You were a senior man to very many of us in the struggle at the time when the journey of Nigeria and the prospect of democracy was less certain.
“And also remember that, at a time when the PDP was in office and when we were in office, and they were saying that there was going to be a federal might, some of us stood out to say no. In 2015, it’s going to be the might of people, not federal might, but the might of the people through the ballot that should determine what will happen. You should be a man of history, what is put before you take it back, don’t sign it.”
Igini who blasted the judiciary as the greatest culprit in truncating the Nigerian democracy, argued that courts had historically failed to protect voters and uphold democracy, blaming it for how the electoral structure of 2023 failed.
Hear him: “The greatest option that we have is the judiciary that must stand tall and mighty in defence of democracy and the rule of law. Were it not for the judiciary, we would not be where we are today. I have all the records of failures. When it comes to elections, the judiciary has not done well. In fact, the Nigerian people now see my constituency as a veritable conspiracy against them because they have never given effect to it.”
Igini also criticised the Senate’s handling of the bill, citing the reversal of Clause 60 provisions that originally mandated real-time electronic transmission of polling unit results.
“Look at what has happened…Today, no primary in Nigeria because Supreme Court struck down the party direction that was issued in line with Section 29 of the Act,” he said.
Igini had earlier warned in a Sunday statement that many National Assembly members risk losing their seats if mandatory real-time electronic transmission is not guaranteed.
He stressed that for democracy to thrive, the judiciary must enforce due process and protect voters’ rights: “The way forward is for the judiciary to stand tall and mighty in defence of due process because what we are seeing now is not what is expected.”