Former President Goodluck Jonathan has refuted media stories alleging that he accused the late President Muhammadu Buhari of links to Boko Haram, asserting that his statements were misinterpreted.
In a Saturday statement issued by his media spokesperson, Ikechukwu Eze, Jonathan denied ever suggesting, implying, or indicating that Buhari had any involvement with or support for the terrorist organization.
The clarification addressed backlash from Jonathan’s comments delivered on Friday during the unveiling of *Scars*, a memoir by retired Chief of Defence Staff Lucky Irabor. There, Jonathan recounted how Boko Haram had once listed Buhari among potential representatives for negotiations with the government.
READ ALSO: Jonathan: If you hurt me I will forgive you
Serving as Nigeria’s leader from 2010 to 2015, Jonathan noted that this reference occurred after his administration formed panels to explore talks with the insurgents.
However, Garba Shehu, Buhari’s former media adviser, rejected the narrative as inaccurate and driven by partisan motives.
Eze elaborated that Jonathan’s words were intended to expose Boko Haram’s cunning approaches, not to incriminate Buhari. The statement read: “The Office of Former President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan has noted inaccurate coverage in some media outlets claiming that he stated Boko Haram selected the late President Muhammadu Buhari, GCFR, as their negotiator with the government, implying some role in the insurgency.
“We want to stress that the former President’s words were seriously distorted. He never indicated, suggested, or hinted at any ties between President Buhari and Boko Haram, or any endorsement of the group.
“Dr. Jonathan’s observations, part of a wider conversation on national security issues, aimed to demonstrate the cunning and scheming methods Boko Haram used in its initial phases.
“He was referring to a known incident where supposed representatives of the group, along with splinter elements, falsely positioned themselves as spokespeople and named high-profile Nigerians as mediators—often without those persons’ awareness or agreement.
“The core message was how Boko Haram deliberately used the reputations of notable figures to create discord, widen political rifts, and erode trust in authorities.
“Thus, his statement exemplified the terrorists’ trickery, not a charge against the late former president or anyone else.
“Dr. Jonathan emphasized that if Buhari were truly their preferred intermediary, one might expect the group’s violent campaign to have ended swiftly during his presidency. To be clear, Dr. Jonathan acknowledges President Muhammadu Buhari’s, like any loyal citizen’s, resolute opposition to terror; he was even a victim of Boko Haram attacks. Both leaders, in their times, worked toward national peace and security.”
Eze called on the public to disregard the altered narratives, reaffirming Jonathan’s dedication to fostering harmony, national cohesion, and strengthening democratic institutions in Nigeria.