Ibrahim Auyo, a member of the All Progressives Congress (APC), representing Hadejia/Auyo/Kafin Hausa federal constituency in Jigawa in the House of Representatives may have landed in troubled waters over his claim that lawmakers pay to move motions and bills.
He has now been taken to task by the assembly to substantiate the claim and expose those involved in the financial transaction, following his revelation that members paid as much as N3million to present bills, motions, and petitions.
In a video that has now gone viral, the lawmaker, who spoke in Hausa language, was overheard telling his constituents: “Since I was elected as a member in 2015, no individual has given me a bill to pass, either from Auyo, Hadejia, or Kafin Hausa. They are just pretending.
“And also, even the bills and petitions are paid for. You have to pay from N3 million, N2 million, or N1 million to present it. And after you present the bill, you must follow up by lobbying the whole 360 members of the house to accept the bill.”
However, less than 24 hours after the video was made public, the House through Akin Rotimi, its spokesperson, fired back, demanding full disclosure of those to whom such transactions were carried out with.
Indicating also that the lawmaker would face the ethics panel if he does not prove his claim, Rotimi, said in a statement: “The House of Representatives has taken note of a viral video in which Rep. Ibrahim Usman Auyo, Member representing Hadejia, Auyo, and Kafin Hausa Federal Constituency of Jigawa State, who alleged that Members of the House receive payments to sponsor Motions, Bills, and Petitions.
“These allegations are unsubstantiated and, if left unclarified, risk undermining public confidence in the National Assembly. Statements of this nature must be backed by verifiable facts and presented through the appropriate parliamentary channels.
“The National Assembly is an institution of records, with well-established and transparent procedures for introducing bills, motions, and petitions, governed by the constitution, House Standing Orders, and parliamentary ethics. The insinuation that sponsoring a motion or bill is a ‘contract job’ involving bribes is inconsistent with these processes and must be clarified.
“When the House reconvenes, Rep. Auyo will be invited to substantiate his claims before the House. Should he be unable to provide evidence, the matter will be referred to the House Committee on Ethics and Privileges for appropriate consideration, in line with parliamentary procedure. The House remains committed to fostering mutual respect among members while upholding the dignity of parliament.”