Vice President, Kashim Shettima, on Friday, pushed back against the pervading insinuations in many circles of a serious rift at the Presidency, saying the comments he made on Thursday was not in any way linked to the State of Emergency rule imposed in Rivers State.
Shettima, had at a book launch in Abuja, the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), declared that the President did not have powers under the Nigerian Constitution to remove an elected leader in Nigeria at whatever level, a comment that was immediately linked to the emergency rule Tinubu imposed on the troubled state on March 18 and interpreted to mean that he was not on all fours with Tinubu’s action.
Stanley Nkwocha, spokesman for the Vice President, in a statement, on Friday, clarified the comments by his boss, stating that they were strictly historical and bore no reference to Tinubu’s intervention in the Rivers crisis.
The VP, who shared his experience with former President Goodluck Jonathan, who he said sought to remove him as governor of Borno State during the Boko Haram insurgency, spoke against the backdrop of the interpretation in many quarters that his narrative was a veiled critique of Tinubu’s decision to impose the emergency rule, which suspended the democratic institutions in Rivers, including the suspension of Siminalayi Fubara, the state governor.
Shettima, while narrating an account of the event on Thursday during the public presentation of OPL 245: The Inside Story of the $1.3 Billion Nigerian Oil Block, a memoir authored by Mohammed Bello Adoke, former Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice (AGF-MoJ), had told his audience, how Adoke and others intervened by warning the ex-President that he had no powers of removing a councillor not to talk about a governor.
Following the intervention of other lawyers in his government, including Aminu Tambuwal, then Speaker of the House of Representatives, Jonathan was said to have banished the idea and halted the move.
Following the interpretation of his narrative as an attack on Tinubu, Shettima said in the statement: “Some news outlets have irresponsibly twisted the vice-president’s account of how the administration of former President Goodluck Jonathan floated the idea of removing him from office during the most intense and critical phase of insurgency in the North-East.
“Such commentary amounts to a reckless endangerment of national cohesion and a deliberate misreading of the vice-president’s message. His remarks were purely historical references made to acknowledge the courage and professionalism of Mohammed Adoke.
“President Tinubu followed the constitutional process with honest precision. The president’s proclamation properly invoked Section 305(2) of the 1999 Constitution, which was subsequently ratified by an overwhelming bipartisan majority in the National Assembly.
“Vice-President Shettima remains firmly aligned with the administration’s goals and has consistently demonstrated his commitment to national stability, constitutional order, and responsible leadership. Vice-President Shettima’s comments were made in good faith and should be appreciated in the proper historical context in which they were delivered. It is dangerous to politicise such statements, especially at a time when unity and clear-headedness are most needed.”