Connect with us

News

BREAKING: Ojukwu caused the civil war, Gowon insists

Published

on

If Emeka Odumegwu Ojukwu, had not gone ahead of me to spill the content of our meeting in Aburi, there might not have been the civil war, Yakubu Gowon, former Nigerian Head of State, said for the umpteenth time on Wednesday.

Gowon, a General, who ruled Nigeria from 1966 to 1975, had in an exclusive interview aired on The Morning Show, a breakfast programme on Arise News television, stopped short of denying that there was actually an accord at his parley with Ojukwu, who prosecuted the war on the side of Biafra that wanted to separate from Nigeria.

The former head of state, who was months short of his 32nd birthday when he took over the country in July 1966 after the coup that led to the assassination of Aguiyi Ironsi, the first military Head of State of Nigeria, said he was down with a bout of fever from malaria, which prevented him from addressing the country on the outcome of the meeting in Aburi, a town in Ghana.

Ojukwu, he said not only preempted him in making the announcement, but actually went ahead to make pronouncements that were contradictory to the agreement, adding that it was this that led to the sharp disagreement between him and the late Biafran leader who died in 2010.

Advertisement

One of the misrepresentations, Gowon, told his host was that Ojukwu, said that the two parties agreed that there would be regional autonomy, with governors that would be in control of the command of their own armies, saying that nothing of the sort was agreed.

But Ojukwu had since countered this angle of the former Head of State’s story, stating that it was because Gowon and those with him at the meeting started denying the content of the Aburi Accord that made him go to town and spill adding that the full package including all the minutes that led to the agreement were already in public domain.

Regardless, Gowon insisted on Wednesday: “Although we said that the military would be zoned, you know, but the control… he wanted, you know, those zones to be commanded by the governor. Say you have a military zone in the north, it would be commanded by the governor of the military in the east, it would be commanded by, you know, by him. And, of course, we did not agree with that one.”

Stressing that the federal delegation never viewed the Aburi meeting as a forum for constitutional restructuring or military devolution, he added: “We just went there as far as we are concerned to be able to meet as officers now, and then to agree to be able to get back home and resolve a problem at home. That was my understanding. But that is not his understanding.

“Unfortunately… I was having serious attack of kind of fever or whatever it is, and I could not make a decision. Ojukwu was one who, when he came, he went and made… a statement about the Aburi Accord.

Advertisement

“We had to organise that, you know, a meeting of all the governors. And he was invited to attend so that we can deal with the Accord. And we met at Nifo in Benin. And he did not turn up.”

Gowon insisted that had Ojukwu attended a meeting in Benin called by him for the parties to straighten out matters, there might have been an amicable resolution and the disagreement might not have escalated to the extent of going into war.

Stressing that the government was willing to work in the “spirit of Aburi,” but would never concede national military control to regional governors, nor accept the possibility of secession, he said: “The only thing that I added was that no region, you know, will, you know, can secede from the country.”

The former Head of State, who expressed deep love for Nigeria, stated that his major wish was to be remembered as a leader who loved Nigeria and the people of the country, adding: “I want to be remembered as someone who loves his country, Nigeria, who loves Nigerians, who prays, at least if I cannot fight, I pray for Nigeria to continue to be a country that all of us love. I know it is impossible for any country to be absolutely perfect.”

Advertisement
Share this story:

News

Electoral Act: Don’t go to sleep, maintain eternal vigilance, ADC tells Nigerians

Published

on

“It demonstrates, in the clearest possible terms, that when citizens act with unity, clarity of purpose, and resolve, they can indeed move mountains.”

These were the exact words with which the African Democratic Congress (ADC), reacted to Tuesday’s agreement of the 10th Senate to reverse the controversial provisions in the Electoral Amendment Bill, in which they earlier retained the discretionary provision of transmission of results of election electronically by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

Bolaji Abdullahi, spokesman of the coalition party, attributing the U-turn to the resilience of Nigerians, described the development as a victory for democracy and people-powered civic action.

Abdullahi, a former Minister, who called on Nigerians to stay alert and continue mounting pressure on relevant authorities until the amended bill secures presidential assent, is duly gazetted, and takes full legal effect, urged Nigerians to maintain eternal vigilance.

Advertisement

Following a groundswell of outrage across the country, regarding its initial decision to retain the 2022 provision and subsequent protests, which saw Peter Obi, presidential candidate of the Labour Party in 2023 and Rotimi Amaechi, former Governor Rivers State, teaming up with a group of Nigerians on Monday and Tuesday, respectively, the Senate eventually bowed to pressure mandating the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to transmit elections to the INEC Result Viewing Portal (IReV), real time, but with a proviso to use manual collation only as a contingency in cases of technological failure.

Hailing the development, ADC stated that the recant by the lawmakers was beyond a simple legislative reversal, but a reflection of the resilience, alertness, and growing political awareness of Nigerians from all segments of society.

The statement, added: “The decision of the 10th Senate to urgently reverse the contentious provisions of the Electoral Amendment Bill that it passed is a significant victory for the Nigerian people.

“This outcome is not merely a legislative U-turn. It is a testament to the resilience, vigilance, and rising political consciousness of Nigerians across all walks of life. From street protests to digital campaigns, the Nigerian people have once again shown that sovereignty truly belongs to them.

“In the face of the ruling APC’s habitual disregard for due process and democratic values, the Nigerian people have reaffirmed their place as the ultimate custodians of our democracy.

Advertisement

“In this regard, the African Democratic Congress salutes the courage and tenacity of Nigerians. We commend every citizen who raised their voice, whether online or offline, to resist legislative mischief that threatened to undermine our electoral integrity.”

Calling on Nigerians to remain steadfast, stressing that the development represents only a step in the right direction, not the final victory, the party, added: “We must now ensure that this momentum is sustained until the amended bill is not only passed but duly assented to by the President, properly gazetted, and becomes an enforceable law of the Federal Republic.

“We must remain vigilant to ensure there are no last-minute betrayals or technical ambiguities, the kind that often lead to ‘stories that touch.’ Let this be a reminder that democracy does not thrive in silence or indifference. It demands participation, persistence, and sometimes, peaceful defiance.”

 

Advertisement
Share this story:
Continue Reading

News

This is the last time Tinubu will intervene in Rivers’ row – Wike  

Published

on

Nyesom Wike, Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), on Tuesday, confirmed that President Bola Tinubu has once again intervened to stem the political schism between the Rivers State House of Assembly and Siminalayi Fubara, the governor that would have led to the latter’s impeachment.

But the Minister, left a caveat – this is the last time the President would be making such an intervention – as he added that both sides would now have to work according to the terms agreed at the parley.

In the latest faceoff which started early in the year, 27 members of the assembly said to be loyal to Wike, had launched a fresh impeachment move against the governor – the third since he took office in 2023, accusing him of sundry infractions of the constitution including spending money without appropriation.

Fubara, who defected to the All Progressives Congress (APC), last year, was believed to have run to the President for succour, whose intervention is believed to have halted the move.

Advertisement

Giving details of the rapprochement, Wike told reporters in Abuja, on Tuesday that the President playing a fatherly role stepped in to resolve disputes between the two parties.

His words: “He is very kind to the people of the state. If there seems to be any problem between the legislature and the governor, as a father, he really has to intervene.

“This is the second time Mr President is intervening and I believe by the grace of God that this will be the last time Mr President will intervene.”

Wike, who has since been linked to the crises from the outset and in firm grips of the lawmakers, also pointed out his own role in the matter, saying: “I have told them to obey Mr President and I know that they would not hesitate.”

Advertisement
Share this story:
Continue Reading

News

Tinubu finally sends Dakingari’s name to Senate after ambassadorial posting row

Published

on

President Bola Tinubu on Tuesday finally sent the name of Usman Isa Dakingari, former Governor of Kebbi State to the Senate for confirmation as as a non-career ambassador after last month’s embarrassing mix-up in which his name suddenly appeared for posting to Turkey without legislative clearance.

Tinubu, in a correspondence conveying the appointment, which was read by Godswill Akpabio, said: “I write for confirmation by the Senate, the appointment of Usman Isa Dakingari as non-career ambassador,.

“Whilst I hope that the senate will consider and confirm the nominee expeditiously, please accept, distinguished senate president, the assurances of my highest consideration.”

After reading the letter at plenary, the Senate President, said the matter would be referred to the Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs for consideration and report back to the Committee of Whole within one week.

Advertisement

Share this story:
Continue Reading

Trending