Hakeem Baba-Ahmed, former spokesman of the Northern Elders Forum (NEF), on Tuesday, lampooned President Bola Tinubu for posting a collosal failure with regards to both improving the quality of life of the average Nigerian and the quality of governance.
“Clearly, the Tinubu administration has failed expectations that it was going to radically improve the quality of governance,” Baba-Ahmed, also until recently, political adviser to President Bola Tinubu, told his host on Political Paradigm, a public affairs programme on Channels Television, aired on Tuesday.
Acknowledging that it was unrealistic the President to reverse the removal of the petrol subsidy, he argued that he should at least tackle the “wastage of resources” accruing from the policy, increase accountability and governance across the three tiers of government adding that the President owed it a duty to tackle the monumental level of corruption and insecurity presently besetting the country.
Tinubu must also do everything to mitigate poverty, devote considerable time to infrastructure and social development, and utilise his presidential power to ensure that money sent to governors, especially those of the All Progressives Congress (APC), was used judiciously.
He said: “So much waste, so much abuse of resources and corruption going on. Nigeria is a tragedy. Even though we have a democratic system, the key element has been missing. That element is the idea that people elect leaders to serve, protect their resources, and use their resources to build a country that is in the interest of the citizens.
“Since 1999, every leadership that has taken over has been worse than the previous one. If you start from the first seven years of President (Olusegun) Obasanjo, I think, honestly, he did pretty well but as some versions of his critics say, he faulted his seven years by trying to see if he could get an additional term.
“President (Umaru) Yar’adua came into power and we had some kind of fresh air. Youngish President, visionary and strong but unfortunately, he didn’t last longer than two years. Jonathan took over and ran the country aground. We fought against Jonathan because we felt Nigeria deserved better leadership than Jonathan. We didn’t realise that we were going to put in place someone who was not even to govern at all.
“Jonathan governed badly, President Buhari didn’t govern at all. Now, you have a President who started on a faulty foot and says: ‘I am going to become President because it is my turn’.
“Even if you forgive him for making that comment, two years into the leadership of President Tinubu’s government, we judge them by their record. They will tell you they are doing great with all the World Bank statistics, all the international ratings and everything but that’s not only the measures you measure a government. You measure by the way citizens live, and if that is the yardstick by which we are going to measure this administration, then clearly, the Tinubu administration has failed expectations that it was going to radically improve the quality of governance of President Buhari.”
Identifying selfishness as the bane of Nigerian democracy, he added: “Nigeria’s leadership problem is a problem of those who have aspired to lead, who have had the opportunity to lead power and they have governed in their interest rather in the interest of the people who voted for them. If you have this kind of people as leaders, put them in the best country, if the leaders have this kind of values, they will do exactly what they are doing now.”