Legal fireworks continued on Monday before Justice Binta Murtala Nyako, in the matter between Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and Godswill Akpabio, Senate President, over the former’s suspension from the Senate.
But proceedings had to be halted in the main case as the court adjouned to first hear the contempt proceedings brought against the Senator representing Kogi Central Senatorial District, at the National Assembly, by Akpabio’s lawyers, for Tuesday, May 13.
At the resumption of the matter on Monday, the lawyers defending the Senate President informed the court that they had filed an application highlighting the Akpoti-Uduaghan’s alleged contempt, contradicting a gag order from the court for parties to refrain from speaking about the case in the media.
The female Senator, one of the four in the Senate of the 10th NASS, had been suspended by the Senate on March 6 for unruly behaviour based on her confrontation of Akpabio on the floor of the assembly, during plenary on February 20 on the recommendation of the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions.
Akpoti-Uduaghan, had rushed to court to obtain an injunction restraining the Senate from investigating her, but regardless of the order obtained ex-parte on March 4, the Senate still moved against her, not only clamping the suspension order, but followed with a swathe of other measures, including stoppage of her salaries.
But a new twist which was raised on Monday was in regards of the courts order on April 4, 2025, where Nyako restrained all the parties, including the Clerk of the National Assembly, the Senate, and Nada Imasuen, Chairman of the committee that investigated the matter, who were all joined in the suit, not to grant media interviews or make social media posts related to the case.
At the resumed sitting on Monday, Akpoti-Uduaghan’s legal team, led by Jibrin Okutekpa, had made to proceed, telling the court that the matter was fixed for hearing and that all required documents had been filed.
But Charles Yoila, Paul Daudu, Ekoh Ejembi (SAN) and Valentine Offia lawyers for the four defence parties who affirmed their compliance with the court’s prior directives and expressed readiness to proceed with the hearing, raised the issue of contempt.
Daudu told the court that despite the order against social media posts, the plaintiff had published a satirical post on her Facebook page, stating: “This matter is coming up for definite hearing. The second defendant has filed its schedule of hearing. Ordinarily, we are ready to proceed, but a further affidavit was served on me just on Friday, which I am entitled to respond to.
“This court ordered that there should be no social media posts, but there was one. The plaintiff herself posted a satirical apology on her Facebook page. The post mocked the court and violated its order, asking it to hold her in contempt.
Ejembi, while echoing the submission, added: “We are alleging that the Facebook post made by the plaintiff is a mockery of the court’s proceedings. We tender a Punch newspaper report showing she made the post despite the court’s order.”
But, Akpoti-Uduaghan’s lawyers, countered, saying, Facebook post was related to the sexual harassment allegation and not the issue before the court, urged the court to disregard the defendants’ submissions and proceed with hearing the substantive matter.
Okutekpa, however failed to get the court to fast-track the hearing, reminding it that the female Senator had spent 68 cumulative days out of the National Assembly, as Nyako insisted that the contempt issue must be addressed first.
“I cannot proceed with this matter until I conclude on the issue of contempt. If there is contempt, I have to hear and determine it first,” the judge said, urging Akpoti-Uduaghan’s who also raised a contempt allegation against all the defendants to also bring them for hearing.