Connect with us

News

Ndume explodes again! Tinubu’s govt deep in nepotism *It’s illegal to appoint 70% Yoruba!  

Published

on

Ali Ndume, Senator representing Borno South, appears unnerved by the hard measures taken against him by the All Progressives Congress (APC), by stripping him of his hitherto position of Senate Chief Whip, last year, as he came with another explosive outing on Monday, directed at the same President Bola Tinubu that got him in trouble with the party.

Ndume, in July 2024, had accused Tinubu of running a government of kleptocracy and Khakistocracy, in an in interview he granted ARISE NEWS, which led the leadership of the APC to move against him, leading to his removal as a principal officer of the Senate.

Advertisement


But apparently undeterred by the measure, the Senator from the terrorism-ravaged state of Borno, came out hard on Tinubu, all but accusing him of filling political positions with people from the South West in disobedience to the Federal Character principle of Nigeria.

A guest of Prime Time, a public affairs programme on the same ARISE NEWS, Ndume, accused Tinubu of not only giving more than 70 per cent of the appointments to Yoruba indigenes, also lamented that even those who were given the jobs had no idea of how to use it to better the lots of Nigerians, who had remained worse off since the President came into power two years ago.

“The figures are there. You can look at the figures. I sent you one. I sent you figures. It’s not that I’m just making accusations. And it’s not that I’m saying, well, the president has no right to do that kind of thing. But it’s a constitutional provision. Section 13, I mean, section 14 (3) of the constitution is very, very clear.

Advertisement


“When you look at it vis-a-vis the appointments made so far, and there are political appointments. If they were appointments that are professional, like you don’t appoint somebody who is not a soldier to be Chief of Army Staff or somebody who is not a policeman to be the IG of police and you can’t appoint the person when he is not qualified.

But then, when you come to look at political appointments, the constitution is very clear. And it is because of avoiding such infractions that the constitution, section 14 (3) clearly states that appointments, especially political appointments should reflect the federal character, and that is not the case here.

“And all I am saying is to call the attention of Mr President to such infractions so that it can be corrected, otherwise, you know, these things can boomerang at a certain period of time.

Advertisement


“I know, as you rightly say, people look at me as somebody that is critical of the government. I have the right to do that in the first place. And in fact, that’s why I’m in the national assembly in the first place. Collectively, we are supposed to oversight the acts of Mr President and point out some of these irregularities. That is what we swore to do. It’s not personal.”

“I think I have better personal relationship than most of these people that are talking about President Tinubu. In the north, if you count five people that have close relationship with Mr President, Ndume is one of them. But that does not stop me from speaking the truth. I have obligations to do that, especially when all of us know that at the end of it all, each one of us will stand before God and God will ask him to account for what he is responsible for.

“Besides, we are all in this government. What will we tell our people? When you have these figures out? It is already viral, it is already in circulation. But you know what, after this interview, those attack dogs or maga-dogs will start attacking Ndume, not the message.

Advertisement


“And that is why we always get it right. It is not about Ndume or me being a Senator. As a Nigerian, I have the right to voice out all these things. Not only that, I have the right to even protest. I have the right. That is guaranteed by the constitution. But from tomorrow, those so-called Tinubu boys or people will start attacking Ndume – he’s a frustrated person. The facts are there. These are the facts. I’m not the one who created it, these are facts that were created by people who were there.

“It’s not about juicier jobs, it is about spread, it’s about equity, it is about justice. Look, the coming of Mr. President is based on justice, equity and fairness and it is expected that he will continue in that direction to ensure fairness, because he swore that as President to be fair, equitable and justful. That’s what the President swore to be.

“But that is not what is being reflected in the events – whether he knows it or he doesn’t know – that’s why I’ve called his attention to look at these things that he can do something about it. That is the issue.”

Advertisement


Share this story:

News

BREAKING: Reps abandon bill on state police, adopt Tinubu’s version!

Published

on

All is now set for the wholesome debate on President Bola Tinubu’s proposal for the creation of state police, with members of the House of Representatives, abandoning their own version of the pitch in favour of that of the executive.

The development, which was part of Tuesday’s plenary, saw the members began an accelerated hearing on the version of the legislation submitted by the President recently, leading to its speedily racing through the first and second readings to rest at the committee stage.

Advertisement


After the Green Chambers adopted the presidential version, effectively suspending the House’s earlier proposal, and attention shifted to the Executive-backed amendment, the document was transported to the House Committee on Constitutional Review for further legislative action.

The Executive bill is expected to undergo detailed scrutiny at the committee stage, where lawmakers will examine its key provisions before it is returned to the floor for further consideration.

 

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

News

BREAKING! Appeal Court halts Atiku! Says, Mark can’t be ADC Chairman!

Published

on

Atiku Abubakar seventh attempt at the presidency has been halted by the Court of Appeal in Abuja, which held that David Mark is not the fit and proper person to assume the position of the National Chairman of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) – the camp that produced the former Vice President as candidate of the party.

Hours after the former VP, who had attempted the bid for the nation’s number one job and is on the seventh edition by virtue of his nomination for the 2027 presidential election by the Mark, agreed with the position of the Federal High Court, Abuja, restraining the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from recognising or participating in any state congresses organised by the former Senate President.

Advertisement


Justice Okon Abang, while reading the lead-judgement in the three-to-one split, said there was no reason for the appellate court to set aside the April 29 order by the lower court, adding that Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, who barred Mark and his executives from interfering with the tenure and functions of the party’s elected state executives, was in order.

Agreeing that the responsibility for conducting state congresses of political parties rested with elected state executive committees and not with the national leadership, he ordered INEC not to recognise the executive produced as a result of the defective process.

Though his position was echoed by Donatus Okorowo in the majority, Justice Abba Mohammed, who disagreed sharply, with a dissenting judgment, held that the case that precipitated the restraining order bordered on a non-justiciable internal affair of a political party, adding that lower court was wrong to have assumed jurisdiction to entertain the matter.

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

News

Lest we forget: Ibom Deep Seaport and Senator Godswill Akpabio — A prophecy foretold?

Published

on

By Ken Harries Esq

Some speeches disappear with the applause that greets them. Others acquire greater force with the passing of time. Their words do not change; history simply grows into them. Years later, they resonate with fresh power, not because they have been rewritten, but because the nation has finally arrived at the realities they foresaw.
One such speech was delivered in April 2012 at the 2nd South South Economic Summit in Asaba. There, Senator Godswill Akpabio, then Governor of Akwa Ibom State, presented what many regarded as an ambitious vision for maritime corridor and blue economy development.

Advertisement


Speaking before political leaders, investors, and development stakeholders at the 2nd South South Economic Summit in Asaba, Akpabio outlined what many regarded as an ambitious vision for a model state in particular and regional development in general. Long before the Ibom Deep Seaport became a national priority, he argued that Nigeria needed new maritime gateways, integrated industrial clusters, aviation maintenance facilities, and modern logistics infrastructure to unlock economic growth. His vision was not simply about building a port; it was about creating an economic ecosystem capable of transforming a region and strengthening the nation’s competitiveness.

Fourteen years later, those remarks read less like political advocacy and more like an economic blueprint whose underlying logic has steadily been vindicated by events and times. Looking back today, his address appears almost prophetic—not because it predicted the future in mystical terms, but because Nigeria has gradually grown into the ideas it contained.

Truly visionary speeches never fade; they gather strength with time. This one deserves renewed attention, not because every prediction has materialised exactly as envisioned, but because it reveals a quality increasingly scarce in public leadership: the ability to think beyond electoral cycles.
Nigeria has never lacked projects. What it has often lacked are leaders willing to imagine the infrastructure of tomorrow while grappling with the demands of today. Akpabio’s vision was shaped by precisely that instinct.

Advertisement


At a time when public discourse was largely focused on roads and recurrent expenditure, he spoke instead of logistics corridors, industrial ecosystems, aviation maintenance, manufacturing clusters, export processing zones, maritime and blue economy opportunities, and security reform—not as isolated initiatives, but as interconnected pillars of national competitiveness.

His vision for the then proposed Ibaka Deep Seaport, now known as the Ibom Deep Seaport, best illustrates this broader philosophy. Rather than presenting it as another state prestige project, he framed it as a strategic response to structural inefficiencies in Nigeria’s maritime sector and the wider economy. He argued that the Lagos ports were already burdened by severe congestion, with vessels waiting for extended periods to berth, driving up costs, disrupting supply chains, and delaying the delivery of critical imports, including pharmaceuticals.

His objective, however, was never to rival Lagos, but to complement it. The distinction is fundamental. No major trading nation concentrates all its strategic maritime infrastructure within a single corridor. Successful economies spread capacity, ease bottlenecks, and create multiple gateways through which commerce can flow efficiently. Nigeria has long recognised this principle in policy documents; Akpabio was among the few public leaders articulating it so clearly more than a decade ago.

Advertisement


Equally significant was his emphasis on geography. He reminded his audience that Ibaka possessed a naturally deep coastline requiring little or no dredging, with water depths of approximately fifteen to seventeen metres. According to his account, the location had been identified as suitable for a deep seaport as far back as 1963, yet decades passed without meaningful progress. His observation that “being a minority area, there was nobody to push it” reflected a broader concern that strategic national investments have too often been influenced by political considerations rather than economic merit.

Whether one agrees entirely with that assessment is, in many respects, secondary. The larger point is that Akpabio consistently argued that national infrastructure should be driven by economic logic, strategic necessity, and long-term national interest rather than sentiment or political convenience. More than a decade later, that remains a lesson Nigeria is still striving to learn.

Yet, to see the 2012 Asaba address merely as a speech about a deep seaport is to miss its larger significance. The Ibom Deep Seaport was never presented as an end in itself. It was conceived as the anchor of a much broader economic ecosystem—a platform around which industries, manufacturing, aviation, logistics, free trade, and investment could flourish.

Advertisement


Akpabio envisioned the acquisition of about 14,000 hectares of land to support a self-sustaining industrial city comprising fertiliser and ammonia plants, refining capacity, manufacturing facilities, and a Free Trade Zone. What development economists today describe as industrial clustering was already embedded in his thinking. The port was simply the gateway.

That broader vision deserves a discussion of its own. Today, Ibom Deep Seaport in that Asaba Speech has berthed.

•Ken Harries Esq is an Abuja-based Development Communication Strategist.

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024. WhirlwindNews