Only someone who has not met Godswill Akpabio, former Governor of Akwa Ibom State and now Nigerian Senate President and Chairman of the National Assembly, would fail to feel a sense of loss at what is happening today within his circle. Anyone who has, especially at close quarters would be touched deeply about the turn of events.

I have had the privilege of meeting him at such quarters many times, enough for me to place him where I believe he reasonably belongs in the political history of Nigeria. That leads me to the conclusion that there are very few, if anybody in that Senate, as presently constituted that could best him for that prime seat of primus inter pares. He is completely fit for purpose as POTS.

Advertisement

I dare say, as governor, Akpabio reflected some of the enchanting qualities of politicians of old – the flamboyance of Nnamdi Azikiwe and Abubakar Rimi, the debonair presence of Joseph Wayas, the wittiness of Chuba Okadigbo, the eloquence of Bola Ige, the vision and transformation skills of Obafemi Awolowo. See what he did with Akwa Ibom for starters. The sudden transformation of that hitherto nondescript and unknown space is ample evidence, of what I’m talking about.

How many Nigerians knew of that state before the arrival of Akpabio? For those who might think it was about the sudden huge wealth the state came into by acquiring some big oil wells, the question might be, how many of what Akwa Ibom was in Akpabio’s time is left today after his departure?

When he was there the state was arguably the Nigerian destination of choice for local and international events. Akwa Ibom not only found special place in the hearts of Nigerians but even elevated to the global map.

Advertisement

Is it still the same today? Hasn’t the state returned to its former status obscurity and ordinariness regardless of the wealth? Yes, those who came after him may have achieved some mind-blowing landmarks as well, but without the Akpabio shine, those efforts only revert to the biblical construct of lighting a candle and covering it with a vessel instead of putting it on a candlestand.

Elsewhere, he was clearly to then PDP what Nyesom Wike is today to the APC government without the brusqueness and obtrusiveness, even after office. Yes, there was the loudness, but not the rash, brash, impertinence, associated with the Minister of the FCT. Akpabio obviously didn’t talk down on Nigerians, he rather wooed them like a love-struck suitor and that left a different mark, more positive than negative, as in today’s switch of places.

Not that he did not have his fair share of scandals and nasty stories – who didn’t as a politician? Even Zik and Awo, in their primal attainment, had. But all those were subsumed in the hollows of the flowing gowns. That was also true of Akpabio.

Advertisement

That was before the APC came calling. No doubt that evil hand, made manifest under Muhammadu Buhari has obviously touched the man with uncommon phenomenon. He seems to have been tinkered to shape into the APC structure.

Imagining Akpabio sitting at the Senate today as the primus inter pares under the PDP, and the picture he depicts otherwise, leaves me with a dose of pity and sour taste, knowing what Nigeria must have missed. It confirms how anything and everything APC hammer touches, turns around from smooth and straight to rough and crooked.

So, when Ned Nwoko, Senator representing Delta North came a few days ago with his own version of Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan in what some people have termed the Akpabiogate, and chose to go after the female Senator for, in his estimation, injuring the “integrity” and “reputation” of the Senate, the question is what integrity? What reputation?

Advertisement

In a piece I just read from the Senator, titled: Defending the Senate’s Integrity Against Emotional Manipulation and Misrepresentation, Nwoko, argued: “The recent outcry over the suspension of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has been twisted into a false narrative of victimisation and suppression. Let it be clear: what was before the Senate was not her petition – something she herself has confirmed – but her conduct on the Senate floor, which violated the decorum expected of lawmakers.”

After making a song and dance about the Senate rules and why they must be respected, he not only implied that it was appropriate that the neck of the Kogi Senator was put on the guillotine, for offending those rules, but emphasised why the allegation of sexual harassment must be concerned to the dustbin.

He even blamed the husband of the Senator for not hushing her up, stressing that he would have done exactly that if it were any of his wives that was involved. But where he seemed to have scraped the wounds of Nigerians was when he began to stress the importance of strong institutions. Instructively, he recognised it as the bulwark of strong democracies across the world.

Advertisement

Hear him: “The Senate must not bow to emotional blackmail or social media outrage fueled by half-truths. Nigeria’s democracy thrives when its institutions are strong, disciplined, and governed by rules – not when they are manipulated to serve personal or partisan interests. We must ensure that the principles of accountability, order, and respect remain the guiding forces of our legislative process. This is not about silencing anyone; it is about ensuring that the Senate remains a place of reasoned debate, not theatrical disruptions.”

I couldn’t agree more. In fact, Nwoko would not be the first to make the point of strong institutions being the vortex of democratic practice. On 11 July, 2009, Barack Obama, then President of the United States of America, while addressing the Ghanian Parliament, on his first visit to Africa, told his audience: “Africa doesn’t need strong men, it needs strong institutions.”

But then, where he failed, and fatally so, was in his rating of the suspension of Natasha among the ways to achieving this. No way! The issue of Natasha doesn’t even merit any reckoning considering what the situation in Nigeria and where the Senate comes in or ought to have come in, in that regard.

Advertisement

See what a strong institution looks like. On February 4, 2020, Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the US House of Representatives, tore the State of the Union address presented by Donald Trump in the presence of the President of the United States and before global television cameras. How about that? Was she afraid that the entire roof of the capitol would collapse on her head? There was a strong bulwark to protect her. Otherwise, she wouldn’t dare.

Juxtapose that with the Ned Nwoko parliament in Abuja, where then of the PDP, he joined other opposition colleagues in singing – on your mandate we shall stand – for Bola Ahmed Tinubu in its hallowed chambers, just to lullaby and serenade the President. Imagine that! Imagine what people in sane climes would be thinking of that selfsame Senate.

Imagine too what would happen if the same Trump picked up his bag one hot afternoon in Washington, heads to Air Force One, and zooms off to Singapore and cause the White House to issue a statement telling Americans that the POTUS, would be spending the next two weeks in the country – on working visit – without prior notice and full details of the benefits to Americans. Imagine what the US congress would do.

Advertisement

But today, the same Tinubu is in France for 14 days on the same account. He did not even make a national broadcast to try and convince Nigerians on the raison d’etre for the trip and the critical nature of the choice. No! It was Bayo Onanuga, his spokesman that would deliver the fait accompli in the usual take-it-or-leave-it manner.

Yet, the same Senate that is craving integrity and reputation, sees no reason not to bark, even if it couldn’t bite, at least to demonstrate its presence. Of course, it wouldn’t be the first time. This was just few weeks after committing the blunder of approving the State of Emergency imposed in Rivers State and the demolition of the democratic institutions that come with it, for which the entire globe is still at a loss today.

So, that Nigerians sneer at not only the Senate, but the entire National Assembly today, cannot be because it failed or was unable to curtail the excesses of Natasha, as Nwoko attempted to infer, but because they know that it is completely bereft. It is neither representative of the people nor does it care about the country as a whole. Where then are the reputation and integrity to protect?

Advertisement

In the first place, such a mundane issue of seating arrangement bruhaha would not have arisen. In a serious Senate Natasha wouldn’t have had the temerity to put up the act of February 20, 2025 if she believed it was home to serious business. That she did, is a demonstrable example of what that critical institution has been reduced to.

So, either way – whether Akpabio actually wanted her to warm his bed or she simply made up the story – exploiting feminism sentiments, it still ends up an adumbration of the parlous state of the NASS as a whole and its notorious image particularly.

Moreover, Nwoko’s other arguments hold no water. I’m sure that he has heard that hell hath no fury than a woman scorned. The day the whole world would hear his dark secret is when he quarrels with his delectable Regina Daniels. Nobody knew that Churchill was a one-minute-man, until the day he called it quits with Tonto Dike.

Advertisement

So, asking why Natasha is just coming out to reveal what happened a year ago, resembles a naïve question a child would ask. Only a rookie would fail to know that in the heart of a woman lurks millions of secrets, which only she could reveal at the time that suits her. Place a mirror in that heart and see how much the inelastic capacity of a woman to conceal.

So, assuming, but not conceding that the Senate President actually toasted her, would it not be normal for her to keep it away from the husband in this context? And if she decided to squeal, wouldn’t it be an extra?

Even ugly women, married or single, get courted daily at the malls, markets, buses, airports and all manner of places. A woman, who comes home daily to regale her spouse of the number of men on her matter, is even more likely to be seen as flippant and unserious, especially in this clime, where women are expected to take care of themselves.

Advertisement

Natasha gave the impression that she had to come out because she felt the harassment was taking a toll on her job as a Senator because Akpabio, who would not take no for an answer decided to punish her for refusing his advances.

Might well be true. Might also be that she indeed sucked the attention and the munificence that came with it and might even have caved in later if the Senate President was patient enough and not have taken the said juicy committee away from her.

It might be, as many have also advanced that she was telling outright lies and simply leveraging on her endowments to hoodwink the unwary – a gambit her traducers accuse her of being adept at to make her public pitch.

Advertisement

Nobody knows. But what is clear is Natasha’s case would have paled to insignificance and reduced to the backwaters of national discourse if the Senate actually had a enough reputation and integrity. It is more likely to be the deficit of same that is at play.

If this were the same Senate under the NASS that displayed bribe money in its chambers or the one that killed that infamous Third Term Agenda, Natasha might not have been of any issue at all. She wouldn’t even dare.

Not only that nobody would believe her, but not a few would have derided it with the dismissive comment with which they treat everyday man-woman issue – so what?  

Advertisement