The Senate once again reverberated with echoes of shouting voices as another drama set in, this time between Oby Ezekwesili, former Minister Education engaged Onyekachi Nwaebonyi, Senator representing Ebonyi North, in a shouting match.
Incidentally, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, Senator representing Kogi Central, whose case has been on the front burner of Nigerian polity since her verbal engagement with Godswill Akpabio, set off a chain of events in the Red Chambers of the National Assembly.
Tuesday’s engagement, came as the Senate began hearing of Akpoti-Uduaghan’s allegations of sexual harassment against Akpabio at before the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions, where the former Minister came as an interested party alongside Abiola Akiyode-Afolabi, lawyer to the Kogi Senator, as well as Zubairu Yakubu, Chief petitioner from Kogi Central, who signed the petition on her behalf.
Trouble started when the petitioner urged the Chairman of the Committee, Neda Imasuen, to step down in the case following the ‘controversial’ manner in which he had so far handled the alleged sexual harassment allegation against Akpabio.
“How can the chairman serve as a judge in a case where he has already publicly taken a position? What is the need for us to present our case when a verdict has already been given before hearing us?” Yakubu questioned.
He further alleged that some committee members had pre-existing ties to Akpabio, which he said compromised their ability to be neutral, a remark, which seemed to have angered some lawmakers, who accused him of attempting to undermine the committee’s credibility.
Ezekwesili, who had first engaged the assembly over the propriety of being put on oath, over her appearance, came into the picture when he told Nwaebonyi to “shut your mouth,” a statement that infuriated him leading to expletives.
Nwaebonyi, who lashed out at the former Vice President of the World Bank, apparently unrestrained, went off: “You’re a fool. What do you mean? Why are you talking to me like that? I will not take it. You’re an insult to womanhood. People like you cannot be here.”
On her part, Ezekwesili retorted that she was not “hooligan,” further escalating the altercation, which momentarily disrupted the hearing before order was restored, with Patrick Ndubueze, a Senator from Imo State, appealing for calm.
“We should stop behaving like people in the marketplace. This is the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. It is sad to hear you (petitioner) say you don’t have confidence in the Senate. What it means is that not everybody here is trustworthy.
“Yes, we are all citizens of this country. But here, you must be recognised before you speak. That is the rule. We cannot just jump to answer questions because you are a petitioner. This is a Standing Committee,” he said
However, Imasuen adjourned the hearing indefinitely following observations that both Akpabio’s wife and Akpoti-Uduaghan have a case in court and the absence of the Kogi lawmaker to defend her allegation.
Addressing journalists after the hearing, Ezekwesili described the Senate’s approach as a gross violation of the Nigerian Constitution and legal framework.
She criticised the committee’s insistence on prioritising Senate rules over constitutional provisions, particularly in cases involving disciplinary actions and petitions.
“The Nigerian Senate keeps telling citizens they are subject to Senate rules, even when those rules violate the Constitution. This is unacceptable in a democracy. The suspension of Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan, was carried out without due regard for constitutional provisions.
“The Senate placed its own rules above the laws of the land. Now, with this petitioner, they have done the same thing – using procedural loopholes to avoid addressing critical issues. If a petitioner says they do not believe the Senate committee will give them a fair hearing due to clear bias, it is only just that an independent body reviews the matter.”
“This could set a dangerous precedent where internal rules override the Constitution. The Senate must respect the Constitution. Otherwise, we risk turning our democracy into a system where powerful individuals manipulate processes to silence opposition and suppress justice.”