The Federal Government on Wednesday, directly accused Siminalayi Fubara, of playing a major role in the pipeline explosions that took place in Rivers State on Monday night and Tuesday, saying he was the one that invited Niger Delta militants to carry out the action, for which the country is now said to be losing $35million daily.
Lateef Fagbemi, Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), who conveyed the position of the government, told reporters in Abuja, on the day he also stoutly defended the imposition of the State of Emergency in the state and suspension of the governor, that from the past statement of the embattled governor, it was not difficult to pin the development on him.
Hear him: “There was what I will call telegraphing of the militants, I will say, by the governor. And I said so when he beckoned to them that, oh, he will let them know when it was time to act, to the militant. Let us say it was wrong. Did he come out to disown them? The answer is no. And a week after, they swung into action. You see or witness the vandalisation of oil pipelines.
“Don’t also forget that before now, that is when this government came into office, Nigeria was producing about 900,000 barrels of oil a day. With the efforts and all the ingenuity that the President had, he ensured that the production rose to about 1.5 million barrels per day. That’s about 45 per cent increase. Governors were smiling home at the end of the month with about 60 per cent increase in their take home to their various states. Then somebody rose or encouraged or became inactive when he was supposed to act. There was not a word dissuading the militants who issued this threat.
“In today’s Nigeria, maybe with the efforts of Mr President, Agriculture will come in. But as at today, we still rely largely on oil. Anyone who touches these pipelines is not only the enemy of Rivers but he is also the enemy of Nigeria. All Nigerians in all 36 states, share in what comes in from the production of this oil. And I believe that the decision of Mr President is anchored on the decision of the Supreme Court.”
Speaking on the necessity for the State of Emergency, Fagbemi, said it was based on the series of infractions of the governor, as confirmed by the Supreme Court, who accused him of running a despotic government, adding that Tinubu would have been irresponsible not to act the way he did.
His words: “The events in Rivers State started long ago, and he tried to intervene many times. Apart from that, well-meaning Nigerians, leaders of thought, and concerned citizens have also attempted to settle the matter without any result. The President came out boldly yesterday to say the situation cannot be allowed to continue, a situation in which the critical economic life of the nation, what is giving lifeline to the nation to be, you know, criminally touched without any response from those who would ordinarily be expected to do so, cannot continue.
“Don’t forget, the whole thing started or crystallised with the judgment of the Supreme Court that was handed down on the 28th day of February 2025 in which the Supreme Court, that’s the highest court in the land, made a categorical pronouncement after making very profound findings of breaches of the Constitution by the parties involved, particularly the governor of Rivers state, concluded that he was acting like a despot and that, as the situation is in Rivers State, there is no Government.
“These are very serious and very weighty allegations that only an irresponsible Head of State or leader will fold his arms and ignore. As I said, he made a very bold decision. We were all there when he addressed the public and chronicled all the facts from Genesis to Revelation.
“Don’t forget that the judgment of the Supreme Court had been widely reported and published in the papers. So, the President was not a party to it, so the question of trying to influence anything would not arise. And by virtue of certain provisions of the Constitution, everybody has a duty to ensure that the judgment of the court is obeyed, particularly coming from the highest court in the land.
“There is no other person to appeal to. There is no other body to appeal to. It’s not subject to any further test of validity. As things are, we all have a duty, collectively and individually to ensure that we give maximum respect and obedience to the judgment of the Supreme Court.”