Connect with us

News

You can’t stop me! Convicted Eze-Igbo, launches legal battle against Lagos gvt

Published

on

Frederick Nwajagu, convicted by Justice Yetunde Adesanya for bearing the title of Eze Ndigbo of Ajao Estate, in rare defiance, has launched a legal challenge against the Lagos State Government, claiming that he is entitled to bear the title under the law of Nigeria without let or hinderance.

This is the crux of his case now before the Court of Appeal in Lagos, coming just two months after he was let off the hook from a two-year ordeal behind bars, because he could not meet his bail condition in a treasonable felony and terrorism case, where he was accused of declaring his intention to invite men of the Indigenous People of Biafra into Lagos.

Advertisement


In a widely circulated video in April, 2023 general elections, Nwajagu was seen making the comments, which he said would be the solution to protecting Igbo properties in the state, believed to be in danger from incessant destructions through arson and other means. Adesanya of the Lagos State High Court, who had previously acquitted and discharged the 67-year-old business man of terrorism charges, on the ground that the Lagos State Government failed to prove the allegations beyond a reasonable doubt, had found him guilty of unlawfully parading himself as a titled chief in Lagos, an offense under the Obas and Chiefs Law of Lagos State and sentenced him to one year in prison without an option of a fine.

However, he was eventually allowed to go home a free man, because the court, in its judgement in January, 2025, also held that his detention, where he stayed more than two years in incarceration, had served as his prison terms.

But in rather defiant move, Nwajagu, is insisting that the appellate court should go the whole hog, by freeing him of scar of a convict, because he committed no offence by adopting the culture of his Igbo people within his private domain, having not claimed publicly that he was a traditional ruler in Lagos.

Advertisement


In his Notice of Appeal, filed by his lawyer, Emefo Etudo, for which the appellate court is yet to fix a date for hearing, Nwajagu is challenging the constitutionality of Sections 26-36 of the Obas and Chiefs of Lagos State Law of 1981, saying it violated Sections 39 and 40 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).
Urging the appellate court to overturn the lower court’s ruling regarding his conviction and grant him a full acquittal and discharge, submitted that the judgment was delivered despite the fact that his activities and his Igbo-speaking community in Ajao Estate were constitutional, and fell within their rights to freedom of association and expression, as guaranteed under Sections 39 and 40 of the 1999 Constitution.
Nwajagu, while further arguing that any restriction imposed by the Obas and Chiefs of Lagos State Law (1981) on these constitutional rights is null and void to the extent of its inconsistency with the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, as amended, stressed that his trial and conviction based on such unconstitutional curtailment of his rights were themselves unlawful.
He asked the court to rule that the learned trial judge erred in convicting him for violating Section 34 of the Obas and Chiefs of Lagos State Law (1981)—a conviction he argues contradicts Section 166 of the Administration of Criminal Justice (Repeal and Re-enactment) Law of Lagos State 2015, adding that the prosecution failed to establish a contravention of Section 34 of the Obas and Chiefs of Lagos State Law (1981).
Emphasising that the law allowed conviction for other offences only if based on evidential findings, he said the circumstances in the instant case did not justify his conviction under Section 34 of the Obas and Chiefs of Lagos State Law (1981), as the prosecution failed to prove any of the nine charges filed against him.

Submitting that that the defendant and his Igbo-speaking community did not issue any statement, decree, edict, law, or act publicly proclaiming the creation of a kingship or chieftaincy, the appeal added: “The defendant did not present himself to the general public as a traditional ruler or create public awareness of such a title. His cultural activities within his private residence cannot, by themselves, establish a kingship or chieftaincy.

In the offensive video, Nwajago was heard saying: “IPOB, we will invite them. They have no job. All of the IPOB will protect all of our shops. And we have to pay them. We have to mobilise for that. We have to do that. We must have our security so that they will stop attacking us at midnight, in the morning, and in the afternoon.”
He was arrested on April 1, 2023, for allegedly threatening to invite members of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) to Lagos to protect the properties of Igbo residents.
On April 5th, was docked before the Magistrate court by the police on a two count charge of conspiracy and conduct likely to cause a breach of public peace.
The police prosecutor, SP Thomas Nurudeen told the court that the Eze Ndigbo and some others at large committed the offences on March 26 at No. 2, Akeem Shitu St., Ajao Estate, Lagos State.
He alleged that Nwajagu put fear in Lagos residents when he threatened to bring IPOB to the state. Nwajagu was also said to have publicly stated that IPOB would shut Lagos State for one month.
The defendant, however, pleaded not guilty to the charge.
On May 6th, Chief Magistrate Peter Nwaka, granted the defendant bail in the sum of N1m with 4 sureties, all of whom must be resident in Lagos.
The court also ordered that one of the sureties must own a property in Lagos which must be registered with the land bureau and which documents must be deposited with the court.
But he was unable to meet the bail conditions and remained in custody.
On May 9th, 2023, Nwajagu was arraigned by the Lagos State Government on a nine-count charge bordering on attempts to commit Acts of Terrorism under Section 403(2) of the Criminal law of Lagos State, 2015; Participation in Terrorism Meeting to Support a Proscribed Entity, Attempt to finance an Act of Terrorism, Preparation to commit an Act of Terrorism under Sections 12(c), 18, 21, 29 & 12(a) of the Terrorism (Prevention & Prohibition) Act, 2022, amongst others.
The defendant pleaded NOT GUILTY to all nine counts and the trial was adjourned to July the 4th, 2024.
During trial, one of the prosecution’s witnesses, Mrs Raulat Ibrahim told the court that Eze-Ndigbo was not a recognised Chieftaincy title in Lagos State.
The witness who is a civil servant at the Ministry of Local Governments, Chieftaincy Affairs and Rural Developments, narrated to the court the processes involved in confirming a chieftaincy title in Lagos State.
The witness said that the procedure was governed by the Obas and Chiefs Law of Lagos State, 2015.
She noted that there was no Oba or any recognised chief in Ajao Estate.
The witness explained that for the Obas, the local government will forward the requirement letter to the ministry and then they will send it to the Ministry of Justice, where it will be forwarded to the Lagos state standing tribunal inquiry for chieftaincy matters.
She stated that the standing tribunal publishes the name in the national newspaper, and interested parties will join the tribunal.
“After it has been resolved, the file will be sent back to our ministry for further processing. Then we start all over again to the Ministry of Justice to the governor’s office etc. Then the ministry will now issue a letter of approval. On the installation day, a certificate of issue will be sent by the Governor for approval, then the ministry will install the Oba.
“The letter of approval will be signed by the permanent secretary of the ministry. There is no installation for Chief. It’s the letter that shows his recognition as a chief in Lagos state,” Ibrahim said.
Ibrahim also told the court that the defendant did not parade himself as Elegushi of Ikate, Baale of Addo nor any of the recognised chiefs.
In her judgment in January, Justice Yetunde Adesanya had convicted Nwajagu for unlawfully parading himself as a titled chief in Lagos.
Justice Adesanya had previously acquitted and discharged Nwajagu of terrorism charges, ruling that the Lagos State Government failed to prove the allegations beyond a reasonable doubt.
However, the court found him guilty of unlawfully parading himself as a titled chief in Lagos, an offense under the Obas and Chiefs Law of Lagos State and sentenced him to one year in prison without an option of a fine.
Since Nwajagu had already spent over two years in custody during the trial, the court ruled that he had effectively served his sentence and was free to go.

Advertisement


Share this story:

News

Obi dares opponents: I’m an open book! *Expose me, scrutinise others too!

Published

on

Peter Obi, candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), has given assignment to Nigerians to put all those aspiring to take up political positions in the country through the grill to ascertain their level of integrity, saying it was required as a sine qua non for the job they seek.

Obi, who has been a subject of discussion in the polity since the allegation of corruption was levied against him by Kenneth Okonkwo, spokesman of his campaign in 2023, over the conduct of the party’s primaries to choose candidates for the 2027 general elections, said the grilling must start with his own person.

Advertisement


A guest in an interview on a podcast with Rufai Oseni, a popular television anchor, the former Governor of Anambra State, stated that it was actually for this reason that he had now sworn to see the litigation he instituted against Okonkwo through.

His take is that the Nollywood actor should use the courtrooms to give all the details of bad behaviour, following his threat to expose him fully, after alleging that he was collecting money from aspirants in the said election for electoral favours.

Hear him: “The issue of taking Kenneth Okonkwo to court wouldn’t have arisen if he had stopped at those allegations. But he claimed he still has more he would expose about me in the future. So, I am very happy to take him to court so that he can expose me publicly, alongside other Nigerians. If any of them has any criminal allegations against me, they should bring them to court.

Advertisement


“Not just Kenneth, everybody should now say those things they know that is bad about me or I did that is wrong because it’s good for the system, it’s good for the society,” Obi said.

“So, if you know that when we were in primary school, this man was cheating or didn’t go to the primary school, didn’t go to secondary school, didn’t do, if you know this man has done something criminal somewhere, this is time to bring it up.”

 

Advertisement


 

 

 

Advertisement


 

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

News

Lifu: This mustn’t happen again – Atiku *Judiciary mustn’t be used to destroy democracy

Published

on

For the umpteenth time, Atiku Abubakar, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has warned about the dangerous implication of using state institutions, particularly the judiciary to destroy Nigeria’s democracy, saying it is an ill-wind that blows nobody any good.

Atiku, presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), speaking on the heels of Tuesday’s verdict of the Court of Appeal, halting the de-registration order by the Federal High Court, insisted that judicial officers must not lend themselves to any act capable of undermining the nation’s democratic process.

Advertisement


The appellate court had ordered a stay of execution on the order made on Monday by Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court Abuja, for the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to deregister the ADC alongside four other political parties).

A totally scandalised Court of Appeal, sitting in Abuja, had taken umbrage, sparing no hard words in upbraiding the lower court judge, stating that his likes were unfit to sit on the bench.

In a unanimous ruling by a three-man panel, the court held that Lifu’s action was “the highest form of judicial impertinence”, stressing that the Supreme Court previously held that a judge who acted in such a manner.

Advertisement


Describing his conduct as the height of judicial rascality, the upper court, stated: “Courts are enjoined to protect their integrity. This Court has supervisory authority over the trial court.

“The decision of the lower court to proceed with the judgment despite the express order of this court is a brazen violation of the hierarchy of the court and the 1999 Constitution.

This court has the duty to invoke its powers in ensuring that its orders are obeyed. The application for a stay of execution is here yet granted. The enforcement of the judgment is stayed.”

Advertisement


Atiku, who hailed the position of the higher court, which restored his hope to be on the ballot as presidential candidate in the 2027 election, also noted the role of INEC as “significant.”

He said: “I welcome the Court of Appeal’s decision to stay the execution of the Federal High Court judgement seeking the deregistration of our great party, the ADC, and four other political parties. It is particularly significant that INEC itself initiated the application for the stay.

“The development reflects growing public concern over judicial contradictions and politically charged rulings within the judiciary. “Any attempt to undermine Nigeria’s hard-won democracy through judicial manipulation is a grave danger to the Republic. If our democracy suffers further injury, history will demand accountability from those entrusted with dispensing justice.

Advertisement


Outside ADC, Lifu’s order, also included: Action Democratic Congress (ADC), Action Peoples Party (APP), Action Alliance (AA), Accord Party (AP) and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP), similarly slammed for allegedly failing to meet the constitutional requirements for continued registration and participation in elections.

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

News

ADC spits fire! Demands arrest of Lifu *Says, Abuja judge, playing with fire!  

Published

on

“He is running in contempt of the court. Justice Lifu should be arrested because he is acting in contempt of the court which is a criminal act,” were the exact words with which the African Democratic Congress (ADC), demonstrated its angst over the court ruling on Monday, ordering its de-registration as a political party in Nigeria.

A furious Bolaji Abdullahi, spokesman of the party, told his host while appearing as a guest on Monday’s edition of Politics Today, a public affairs programme on Channels Television that the judge of the Abuja Federal High Court who gave the order was actually playing with fire because of the consequences.

Advertisement


Directly accusing him of playing the script of the All Progressives Congress (APC), to ensure that President Bola Tinubu emerged the sole candidate for the 2027 presidential election, the party spokesman, was emphatic that the plan would not work, as head or tail, ADC must be on the ballot in all the elections.

Hear him: “There is a Court of Appeal order saying don’t hear this case until October 27. So, on what basis? You can’t place something on nothing. The Court of Appeal said don’t act on this until I hear it on October 27. So, on what basis did he deliver the judgement

“So, for us in the African Democratic Congress, what we’re convinced and they know is what they have done has no leg to stand on legally. What they want to do is to create doubts in the minds of the people that this ADC has too many legal cases, can we actually run on this? And to distract us. But we’re not distracted.

Advertisement


“We’re very clear. It was in spite of all they have done since ADC came on board that we ran one of the best and one of the most comprehensive direct primaries in the history of democracy in Nigeria. So, we are strong enough to withstand this. And that’s why I’m saying that we are going to contest in 2027. We’re ADC. We don’t buckle before dictatorship.”

Stressing on the implication of the judgement, which also affected Accord Party (AP), Action Peoples Party (APP), Action Alliance (AA), and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP) for allegedly failing to meet constitutional and electoral performance requirements, following a suit by the National Forum of Former Legislators, he said it portended grave danger.

He added: “We are not surprised. We know that the Nigerian people believe that there is a problem with the judiciary, but what we did not expect is the level of judicial rascality that was demonstrated today.

Advertisement


“What we are saying is that we reject it in its totality, and we are saying that the people behind this are playing with fire. Hundreds, if not thousands, have obtained nomination forms and contested elections and emerged as candidates on the platform of the ADC.”

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024. WhirlwindNews