Godswill Akapabio, President of the Senate, on Tuesday, upped the ante over last week’s engagement with Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, Senator representing Kogi Central at the National Assembly, all but describing her as grossly inexperienced, which manifested in her conduct that was completely at variance with parliamentary rules.
Akpabio, former Governor of Akwa Ibom State, spoke on the day the Senate referred the case of the Senator, which threw the legislative chambers into a rowdy session on Thursday, February 20 to the Ethics, Code of Conducts and Public Petitions, to treat the matter, as members called for sanctions against her.
Before the motion was put to the floor, Akpabio, who harped on the need to study the ground rules of the Senate by all the lawmakers, ordered the NASS administration to make it mandatory to organise periodic training for members, especially those coming late into the chambers.
Using the case of Akpoti-Uduaghan, he narrated how she began to falter from the first day of joining the Senate even before opening the rulebooks, adding that the penchant for hastiness in engaging on the floor without the rudiments of learning the ropes that led to embarrassing confrontation, last week.
Hear him: “Even the first time the issue came up here, our distinguished sister was not even speaking from her seat and that was when we tried to call her to order. I think part of the problem is when people come from the courts – court-declared Senators – they miss the orientation.
“The management of the National Assembly is hereby ordered to organise periodic orientations particularly for Senators who are mid-streamers, who came midstream and did not start when their colleagues started. I remember that this particular Senator on the day she was sworn in, raised her hand to speak.
“I was scared, but I had to recognise her, because I was saying, we just gave her the rulebook – part of what we give to you is the standing order of the Senate – so, I said, has she even opened the rulebook to know what she’s going to say?
“But she made a contribution on that day and I think two days later she brought a motion. There’s nothing wrong about being vibrant, but there’s a lot wrong when you don’t know about the procedure. You can’t be a reverend father and go and start a church service with communion. You must lay the foundation.”
Akpabio cited Order 66(2) and Section 55 of Senate rules, which empowered him to walk out unruly members from the Senate chambers even for a whole day’s session, maintaining that there must be decorum.
Stressing the need for order and discipline within the assembly chambers, the former governor said that even Senators who engaged in other unwelcome conducts such chewing gum, drinking water or being disruptive during sittings, risked being sanctioned.
“The rules empower the Senate President to suspend a senator for infractions for at least 14 days. It’s not me who made the rules, it’s in the rule book,” he added.
The Senate, however, unanimously voted to refer the matter to the committee for disciplinary review over the issue prompted from the Kogi Senator’s rejection of a rearranged sitting arrangement, which would require her moving from her original seat to another.
The Senate referred the matter to the Committee headed by Neda Imaseun, after revisiting the controversy, which has continued to attract public commentaries through a motion raised under Order 1(b) and 10, regarding the sponsors described as Akpoti-Uduaghan’s “extreme intransigence.”
Brought by Yemi Adaramodu, Senate spokesman, who stated that the media had been awash with the issue, stressed how he had been working on mending the perception of the 10th Senate, adding: “The Senate is not a platform for content creation but a place for lawmaking and oversight functions. The Senate leadership must enforce discipline. Where there is sin, there must be a penalty.”
Opeyemi Bamidele, Senate Leader, echoing the sentiments, added: “There is no one who does not have an opinion on this issue, but we are unified by our rules. Under our watch, we will not allow this institution to be discredited beyond what we inherited. Integrity is non-negotiable.”