If Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, is able to convince the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court sitting in Abuja, Godswill Akpabio President of the Senate will have to cough out a whopping N1.3billion damages for allegedly saying that the Senator representing Kogi Central, only knows how to paint her face with pancake and wear transparent clothes.
This is the crux of Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suit before the court on Tuesday, where she is claiming injuries to her reputation, by the hurtful words allegedly penned against her on the prompting of Akpabio, former Minister of Niger Delta Affairs.
The suit has opened a fresh chapter in the confrontation between the Senator and the former governor, arising from what is said to be a rearrangement of the sitting positions in the chambers of the Senate, which required Akpoti-Uduaghan to relocate from her seat.
It is coming on the same day when the Senate resolved to look into the conduct of the only female Senator from Kogi and one of the eight in the 10th Senate, with the prospect of some disciplinary measures coming against her in the next two weeks when a committee in that regard would turn in its report.
Specifically, the matter was referred to the Ethics, Code of Conducts and Public Petitions, for disciplinary actions, after the motion to do so was brought by Yemi Adaramodu, Senate spokesman, who stated that the media had been awash with the issue, which left the Senate and members with a lot of lacerations.
Stressing how he had been working on mending the perception of the 10th Senate, he added: “The Senate is not a platform for content creation but a place for lawmaking and oversight functions. The Senate leadership must enforce discipline. Where there is sin, there must be a penalty.”
Opeyemi Bamidele, Senate Leader, echoing the sentiments, added: “There is no one who does not have an opinion on this issue, but we are unified by our rules. Under our watch, we will not allow this institution to be discredited beyond what we inherited. Integrity is non-negotiable.”
But at the same time the debate on the issue of possible punishment was on, the Kogi Senator, was actually heading to court to extract a pound of flesh against the Senate President for lowering her reputation in the eyes of right-thinking members of the society.
In the suit filed by Victor Giwa, Akpoti-Uduaghan’s lawyer, the female lawmaker urged the court to move against Akpabio and Mfon Patric, his senior legislative aide listed as second to third defendants, who allegedly caused words defaming her to be published on his Facebook.
Titled: Is local content committee of the senate Natasha’s birthright? the Senate President’s aide allegedly asked whether the Kogi Senator thought being a lawmaker was all about “pancaking her face and wearing transparent outfits to the Chambers?”
Alleging that the statement was defamatory, provocative, and disparaging, and lowered the Senator’s dignity in the eyes of her colleagues and right-thinking members of the public, she sought: “A declaration that the words ‘it is a bottled anger by the Kogi Lawmaker, who knows nothing about legislative rules.
“She thinks being a lawmaker is all about pancaking her face and wearing transparent outfits to the Chambers’ used and written by the 3rd defendant at the prompting of the 1st and 2nd defendants is defamatory and intended to cause public opprobrium and disaffection towards the claimant by members of the public.”
Besides urging the court to restrain the defendants or associates from publishing defamatory words against her on any platform, she also asked for: “An order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants whether acting by themselves or through their agents, privies, assigns, or associates from further publishing or caused to be published the said defamatory words herein stated or any other similar publications about the claimant on the social media platform or in any other manner, which is capable of defaming the claimant.
“An order for payment of the sum of ₦100,000,000,000 as general damages. An order for payment of the sum of ₦300,000,000.00 only as cost of action.”