Connect with us

News

From Carter, I learnt not to keep quiet even out of office – Obasanjo

Published

on

For those wondering the reason Olusegun Obasanjo, Nigeria’s longest-serving leader – 11 years – three years as military Head of State and eight years as elected President – picked up his penchant for advocacy even out of power, including not only crusading for the betterment of humanity, but actually challenging bad governance, especially in Nigeria, the answer came on Monday – Jimmy Carter influence.

The former Nigerian leader, said he took the cue from Carter, the 39th President of the United States – 1977-1981, with whom he had a chummy relationship within and out of office, one, which was accentuated with the former POTUS, being the first US leader at that level to visit Nigeria, even with the country having Obasanjo as a military leader at the time.

Advertisement


The ex-POTUS, who passed on at the age of 100 years on Sunday, had not only used his remaining years out of office, where he spent only one term to advocate and enhance development for humanity through his Carter Centre, but had at various times, reason to question the activities of his successors, especially in the tenure of Donald Trump, the 45th POTUS, who incidentally is returning to office in January after losing out to Joe Biden, the incumbent four years ago.

Obasanjo, in a rare appearance on television since the end of his second tenure in 2007, even though he had remained a critical voice at the national stage, told his hosts on The Morning Show, a breakfast programme on Arise News television that he learnt a lot from his collaboration with Carter, one of them, not keeping silent in the face of burning issues.

Hear him: After he left office, he devoted his time to civil rights and western liberal democracy. He was persistent on that. In Jimmy Carter, I saw what was called ‘symbol of power’ not the bully that people take power to mean nowadays. I believe if you are the leader of a country, either as a President or Prime Minister or the opportunity to be at the top of your country and you disengage from that opportunity, your term should not end there.

Advertisement


“One good thing about that is that whether you spent two years, five years, 10 years, 12 years, you have acquired certain experience, you had also made certain friends and they are all there to be tapped into for the good of the world, not only for your country. Part of the problem of the world today, is what I call deficit of leadership. I’m not talking about leadership only at the political level. Of course at the political level matters most, because politics drives all other things, but at all levels.

“I’m not also talking about only incumbent leaders – incumbent leaders matter more, because they have the power and all that goes with the power, but those that have also had opportunities and God has endowed. They should realise that the world that we are living in that we call a village, if anybody failed to play his part and his role in that village, that village will soon be destroyed. And that should clear to all of us.

“That was clear to Jimmy Carter. In office, he was humble and out office, he did not go home to sleep. He remained active, even criticising those who came after him, who were not doing what they should do. And one thing is that when you have gone through it, you know certain things that should be done. And when they are not done, it pains you as a leader, who has gone through it.

Advertisement


“That is one lesson that we can learn from President Carter. He was active until he had no power to be active anymore. And I believe that God created you for a purpose and part of that purpose is to be of service to humanity. And by being of service to humanity is to be of service to God. And you shouldn’t shirk your responsibilities in that wise.”

Advertisement


Share this story:

News

BREAKING: Reps abandon bill on state police, adopt Tinubu’s version!

Published

on

All is now set for the wholesome debate on President Bola Tinubu’s proposal for the creation of state police, with members of the House of Representatives, abandoning their own version of the pitch in favour of that of the executive.

The development, which was part of Tuesday’s plenary, saw the members began an accelerated hearing on the version of the legislation submitted by the President recently, leading to its speedily racing through the first and second readings to rest at the committee stage.

Advertisement


After the Green Chambers adopted the presidential version, effectively suspending the House’s earlier proposal, and attention shifted to the Executive-backed amendment, the document was transported to the House Committee on Constitutional Review for further legislative action.

The Executive bill is expected to undergo detailed scrutiny at the committee stage, where lawmakers will examine its key provisions before it is returned to the floor for further consideration.

 

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

News

BREAKING! Appeal Court halts Atiku! Says, Mark can’t be ADC Chairman!

Published

on

Atiku Abubakar seventh attempt at the presidency has been halted by the Court of Appeal in Abuja, which held that David Mark is not the fit and proper person to assume the position of the National Chairman of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) – the camp that produced the former Vice President as candidate of the party.

Hours after the former VP, who had attempted the bid for the nation’s number one job and is on the seventh edition by virtue of his nomination for the 2027 presidential election by the Mark, agreed with the position of the Federal High Court, Abuja, restraining the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from recognising or participating in any state congresses organised by the former Senate President.

Advertisement


Justice Okon Abang, while reading the lead-judgement in the three-to-one split, said there was no reason for the appellate court to set aside the April 29 order by the lower court, adding that Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, who barred Mark and his executives from interfering with the tenure and functions of the party’s elected state executives, was in order.

Agreeing that the responsibility for conducting state congresses of political parties rested with elected state executive committees and not with the national leadership, he ordered INEC not to recognise the executive produced as a result of the defective process.

Though his position was echoed by Donatus Okorowo in the majority, Justice Abba Mohammed, who disagreed sharply, with a dissenting judgment, held that the case that precipitated the restraining order bordered on a non-justiciable internal affair of a political party, adding that lower court was wrong to have assumed jurisdiction to entertain the matter.

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

News

Lest we forget: Ibom Deep Seaport and Senator Godswill Akpabio — A prophecy foretold?

Published

on

By Ken Harries Esq

Some speeches disappear with the applause that greets them. Others acquire greater force with the passing of time. Their words do not change; history simply grows into them. Years later, they resonate with fresh power, not because they have been rewritten, but because the nation has finally arrived at the realities they foresaw.
One such speech was delivered in April 2012 at the 2nd South South Economic Summit in Asaba. There, Senator Godswill Akpabio, then Governor of Akwa Ibom State, presented what many regarded as an ambitious vision for maritime corridor and blue economy development.

Advertisement


Speaking before political leaders, investors, and development stakeholders at the 2nd South South Economic Summit in Asaba, Akpabio outlined what many regarded as an ambitious vision for a model state in particular and regional development in general. Long before the Ibom Deep Seaport became a national priority, he argued that Nigeria needed new maritime gateways, integrated industrial clusters, aviation maintenance facilities, and modern logistics infrastructure to unlock economic growth. His vision was not simply about building a port; it was about creating an economic ecosystem capable of transforming a region and strengthening the nation’s competitiveness.

Fourteen years later, those remarks read less like political advocacy and more like an economic blueprint whose underlying logic has steadily been vindicated by events and times. Looking back today, his address appears almost prophetic—not because it predicted the future in mystical terms, but because Nigeria has gradually grown into the ideas it contained.

Truly visionary speeches never fade; they gather strength with time. This one deserves renewed attention, not because every prediction has materialised exactly as envisioned, but because it reveals a quality increasingly scarce in public leadership: the ability to think beyond electoral cycles.
Nigeria has never lacked projects. What it has often lacked are leaders willing to imagine the infrastructure of tomorrow while grappling with the demands of today. Akpabio’s vision was shaped by precisely that instinct.

Advertisement


At a time when public discourse was largely focused on roads and recurrent expenditure, he spoke instead of logistics corridors, industrial ecosystems, aviation maintenance, manufacturing clusters, export processing zones, maritime and blue economy opportunities, and security reform—not as isolated initiatives, but as interconnected pillars of national competitiveness.

His vision for the then proposed Ibaka Deep Seaport, now known as the Ibom Deep Seaport, best illustrates this broader philosophy. Rather than presenting it as another state prestige project, he framed it as a strategic response to structural inefficiencies in Nigeria’s maritime sector and the wider economy. He argued that the Lagos ports were already burdened by severe congestion, with vessels waiting for extended periods to berth, driving up costs, disrupting supply chains, and delaying the delivery of critical imports, including pharmaceuticals.

His objective, however, was never to rival Lagos, but to complement it. The distinction is fundamental. No major trading nation concentrates all its strategic maritime infrastructure within a single corridor. Successful economies spread capacity, ease bottlenecks, and create multiple gateways through which commerce can flow efficiently. Nigeria has long recognised this principle in policy documents; Akpabio was among the few public leaders articulating it so clearly more than a decade ago.

Advertisement


Equally significant was his emphasis on geography. He reminded his audience that Ibaka possessed a naturally deep coastline requiring little or no dredging, with water depths of approximately fifteen to seventeen metres. According to his account, the location had been identified as suitable for a deep seaport as far back as 1963, yet decades passed without meaningful progress. His observation that “being a minority area, there was nobody to push it” reflected a broader concern that strategic national investments have too often been influenced by political considerations rather than economic merit.

Whether one agrees entirely with that assessment is, in many respects, secondary. The larger point is that Akpabio consistently argued that national infrastructure should be driven by economic logic, strategic necessity, and long-term national interest rather than sentiment or political convenience. More than a decade later, that remains a lesson Nigeria is still striving to learn.

Yet, to see the 2012 Asaba address merely as a speech about a deep seaport is to miss its larger significance. The Ibom Deep Seaport was never presented as an end in itself. It was conceived as the anchor of a much broader economic ecosystem—a platform around which industries, manufacturing, aviation, logistics, free trade, and investment could flourish.

Advertisement


Akpabio envisioned the acquisition of about 14,000 hectares of land to support a self-sustaining industrial city comprising fertiliser and ammonia plants, refining capacity, manufacturing facilities, and a Free Trade Zone. What development economists today describe as industrial clustering was already embedded in his thinking. The port was simply the gateway.

That broader vision deserves a discussion of its own. Today, Ibom Deep Seaport in that Asaba Speech has berthed.

•Ken Harries Esq is an Abuja-based Development Communication Strategist.

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024. WhirlwindNews