News
Northern youths move against Jubrin for supporting Tinubu’s ‘evil’ tax bill
Barau Jibrin, Deputy Senate President, on Saturday, came under a heavy bombardment by youths in the North for his role in the new Tax Reform Bills, presented by President Bola Tinubu, which passed the second reading at the National Assembly on Thursday.
A day before Jubrin, had presided over the plenary where some members of the Northern caucus at the Senate staged a walk-out including Ali Ndume, Borno South and Abdul Ningi, Bauchi Central, over issues regarding the contentious bill, before it was passed the second reading on Thursday and is now set for the final stage of public presentation and passage.
On Saturday, the youths, representing 19 northern states, accused Jubrin, representing Kano North Senatorial District of going against the interest of the region, stating that his disposition was anti-North.
Many leaders from the area seem unfazed by Tinubu’s explanation that the bills would ensure uniformity in tax revenue administration across Nigeria, eliminate double taxation, use taxation to encourage private sector investment in critical industries and boost disposable incomes through targeted tax exemptions.
Opeyemi Bamidele, Senate Leader, had in pushing the four bills – Joint Revenue Board of Nigeria (Establishment) Bill, 2024 -SB.583 – The Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) BILL, 2024- SB.584 – The Nigeria Tax Administration Bill, 2024-SB.585 – and The Nigeria Tax Bill, 2024 – SB.586, as “a significant move to overhaul the country’s tax system.”
Regardless, the powerful voices in the North intent on killing it on the ground that it offended the region’s socio-economic development, were joined by the by Northern Youth Assembly, who assailed the Deputy Senate President for presiding over the sitting where it passed Second Reading.
Conveying their anger in an open letter signed by Ali Mohammed Idris and Abdulhafiz Garba, President and Secretary respectively the youths assailed Jubrin’s position saying it did not represent the interest of the North.
Part of the letter, read: “The Northern Youth Assembly (Majalisar Matasan Arewa), on behalf of the 19 northern states leadership of the assembly, wishes to express our unequivocal disappointment and dismay in you, following your action towards the scaling for the second reading, of an evil tax reform bill, which would certainly undermine the North, and further relegate the region economically and commercially.
‘’Your support for the passage of the proposed evil tax reform bill put forth by the Tinubu administration is the highest order of your insensitivity to the economic and commercial plight of your constituency, Kano State and the entire Northern Nigeria.
“As representatives of the Northern Nigerian youths, we believe the proposed tax reform bill, in its current form, would surely disproportionately affect the economic livelihoods and aspirations of our people, and it is of course without taking into cognizance of the current economic reality in the country.
“Our disappointment is more on your attitude at the Senate plenary to impose your opinion and interest. Even though you are quite aware that this bill is anti-North and has the tendency of further impoverishing the people in the North, and would further cripple economic and commercial activities in the region, and yet you are hell-bent on making it a reality.
“While it is obvious that the proposed tax reform is of so much interest to the people at the centre, however, your unwavering enthusiasm to champion the bill, which is anti-North, exposes your misguided commitment to the course of protecting the interest of those you represent.
“Practically, the North faces a barrage of critical issues such as shortage of electricity supply, rampant insecurity across the region, naked poverty, unemployment and a dismal state of infrastructure, to name just a few, but you have yet resolved to lead the war of further destroying the little prospects left of the North.
“Let us remind you that the purpose of your election was to fundamentally champion the course to address the development challenges facing your region, through effective legislative engagement, rather than dedicating your energy to serve an anti-northern Nigeria agenda, which would further marginalise the Northern Nigerian people, the region where you come from. It would be wiser and more beneficial for you to prioritise your focus towards championing the course of alleviating the pressing socio-economic challenges ravaging the people in the North.
“This tax reform, in its current form, threatens to exacerbate the burdens of businesses and families in Northern Nigeria—that are already struggling to survive due to inconsistent power supply and un-friendly government policies which have been crippling the economy and growth of Northern Nigeria.
“Northern Nigeria requires only the leaders who could speak in the interest of the region, not hired lobbyists and agents of destruction, who would do everything to misguide and deceive their people for some cheap political gains.
“We wish to inform you that the Northern Youth Assembly is highly disappointed in you and your cohorts for accepting to be engaged to destroy the north and its future. We are committed to fighting this course with our last drop of blood and to expose you and your likes, who are ready to auction the North and its future, as we could no longer trust and surrender our destiny into the hands of political merchants, betrayers and political hypocrites.
“The proposed Tinubu Tax Reform Bill is evil and that was the reason the National Economic Advisory Council and Northern governors rejected the bill in the first place, while people like you are trying to justify what is wrong in its totality to cash on the situation for some cheap political gain.
“We wish to finally advise you to change your ways before the entire people in the North, old and young, children and women are mobilised to place their curse on you.’’
News
The Sundiata Post Model (2): Historical and intellectual foundations of a knowledge-producing newsroom
Every institutional framework has a history, even when it introduces something new. Ideas rarely emerge in complete isolation; they arise from deep, structural conversations that began long before us, evolving across generations as societies confront new realities, systemic shocks, and unanswered questions.
The Sundiata Post Model is no exception. Although formally introduced in the previous essay as an institutional framework for media-based knowledge production, its intellectual roots extend much further back. They lie within a long tradition of journalism’s engagement with ideas and society, while simultaneously responding to a distinctly twenty-first-century challenge: the transformation of the newsroom in the age of artificial intelligence, digital knowledge architectures, and global scholarly networks.
The question at the heart of this essay is therefore not whether journalism has ever produced ideas—history provides an unequivocal answer to that. The more critical question is whether the modern newsroom can become an institution deliberately organised to generate original analytical constructs that contribute simultaneously to journalism, deep scholarship, and public policy. That is a different, more demanding question altogether.
Nigeria’s Tradition of the Newspaper as an Intellectual Institution
Long before the emergence of today’s hyper-accelerated digital media, some of Nigeria’s most influential newspapers were already serving purposes far beyond the passive reporting of daily events.
The press architectures established by pioneers like Nnamdi Azikiwe and Obafemi Awolowo—both of whom I previously discussed, alongside Chinweizu, as members of Nigeria’s rare tradition of framework builders—became foundational vehicles through which sophisticated ideas about nationalism, constitutional development, socio-economic planning, democracy, and self-government entered the public consciousness. Their publications did not merely describe political transformation; they actively generated the conceptual architecture that shaped it.
Crucially, they achieved this by building powerful media infrastructures designed to carry these ideas at scale. Azikiwe did not just publish in Lagos; he deployed a sweeping, cross-regional syndicate anchored by the West African Pilot alongside a network of provincial pillars including the Eastern Guardian in Port Harcourt, the Nigerian Spokesman in Onitsha, and the Southern Nigeria Defender in Warri. Similarly, Awolowo founded the Nigerian Tribune in 1949 as a highly structured institutional vehicle to systematically articulate socio-political theory and regional constitutional destiny.
In his seminal work, Renascent Africa (1937), Azikiwe laid out a broad intellectual and ideological vision that extended far beyond the immediate horizon of standard journalism, charting a course for mental emancipation and African self-determination. A decade later, Awolowo’s Path to Nigerian Freedom (1947) demonstrated how a publisher and institutional thinker could systematically articulate a rigorous, structured constitutional vision for a developing nation.
This historical experience reminds us that journalism in Nigeria has never been confined solely to stenography. At critical turning points in the nation’s history, newspapers operated as the primary intellectual laboratories through which society debated its structural future.
This tradition of intellectual leadership through journalism is not merely of historical interest. In The Sunday Stew essay mentioned earlier, ‘The Insecurity Triad: Azikiwe, Awolowo, and Chinweizu — Nigeria’s Elite Class of Framework Builders’, I argued that Nigeria has, on rare occasions, produced public intellectuals who moved beyond commentary to construct enduring analytical frameworks. Azikiwe and Awolowo exemplified that earlier tradition, while Chinweizu demonstrated that independent conceptual innovation could continue outside formal state institutions and conventional academic structures. The present essay extends that argument by asking a different question: can the contemporary newsroom itself become an institution deliberately organised for systematic framework building and knowledge production?
Yet, an important distinction must be recognised between that era and our contemporary challenge:
The Nationalist Press primarily advanced political ideas, anti-colonial mobilisation, and national aspirations.
The Sundiata Post Model represents a shift from ideological mobilisation to systematic institutional knowledge production. It asks whether an independent newsroom can generate original analytical constructs capable of standing up to the rigorous validation of the global academic ecosystem while serving active policy discourse.
The distinction is subtle, but fundamental. It marks the evolution from political journalism to scholar-journalism.
Journalism and the Life of Ideas
The structural relationship between journalism and ideas extends well beyond regional borders. To understand the global intellectual foundations of this model, we must reconcile two complementary traditions of public thought—both of which proved invaluable in shaping the conceptual foundations of my Trinity of State Decay (TSD) theory.
In framing the mind dimension of the Money–Land–Mind dynamic of the TSD, I found the works of Walter Lippmann and Hannah Arendt particularly illuminating, insightful, and enriching. Few journalists have shaped modern thinking about public communication as profoundly as Lippmann. Throughout his six-decade career in American journalism, he demonstrated that journalism could become far more than a chronicle of events; it could serve as an instrument for decoding how societies acquire knowledge, construct public opinion, and navigate increasingly complex realities.
In his foundational classic, Public Opinion (1922), Lippmann demonstrated that journalism could contribute not merely rapid information, but macro-level interpretation, permanently altering how we view the relationship between media, knowledge, and public policy. It is this Lippmannesque understanding on how information is filtered, misperceived, and understood that informs the epistemic foundations of the TSD.
From a different, deeply philosophical tradition, Hannah Arendt, a political theorist and independent scholar whose ideas reached wide audiences through public intellectual magazines and cultural journals, devoted her life’s work to understanding the structural anatomy of politics, authority, institutional decay, and the conditions that make collective civic life possible.
In The Human Condition (1958), Arendt examined human action, public space, and the enduring value of disciplined conceptual inquiry in explaining political reality far beyond the fleeting nature of immediate headlines. Her profound insights into the erosion of institutional authority and the fragility of the public realm provide an important philosophical foundation for understanding the Trinity of State Decay’s vectors of systemic fragility.
Although operating within vastly different institutional environments, Lippmann and Arendt represented complementary pillars of intellectual rigor:
One demonstrated journalism’s unmatched capacity to shape and democratise public understanding.
The other demonstrated the enduring value of rigorous, uncompromised conceptual thinking regarding public life and the human world.
Together, they illuminate an important institutional possibility. If journalism can generate immediate public understanding, and disciplined inquiry can generate enduring concepts—as demonstrated by their influence on the conceptual foundations of the Trinity of State Decay—might there exist an institutional framework capable of integrating both traditions within a single, independent newsroom?
That synthesis is the exact intellectual domain of the Sundiata Post Model.
An Abuja Newsroom and a Contemporary Question
The Sundiata Post Model emerged not from an insular academic department, a government research institute, or a foreign-funded policy think tank, but from an independent newsroom in Abuja. That geographical and operational fact is highly significant.
The framework did not begin as an abstract theory searching for practical application. It emerged from journalism itself—from the lived, daily experience of reporting, investigating, analysing, and reflecting on the severe structural forces shaping Nigeria and the wider Global South.
Over time, The Sunday Stew gradually evolved beyond a weekly opinion column into a platform for systematic, empirical inquiry. Through that deliberate evolution emerged a succession of original analytical frameworks:
•The Insecurity Triad: A conceptual framework explaining how kidnapping (Money), banditry (Land), and terrorism (Mind) function as mutually reinforcing dimensions of contemporary insecurity, generating parallel systems of violence, governance, and authority;
•The Trinity of State Decay (TSD): A macro-theoretical formulation explaining how the interaction between the Institutional Mirage, the Shadow Order, and the Money–Land–Mind dynamic drives the decoupling of formal sovereignty from effective state authority, and
•The Decoupling Sovereignty Index (DSI): An indigenous, multidimensional measurement framework designed to quantify the extent to which effective sovereignty has decoupled from formal state authority across subnational territories.
What gradually became apparent was that these were not isolated intellectual exercises. They were the deliberate products of an emerging institutional philosophy developed through the Sundiata Post Intelligence Unit (SPIU).
More importantly, these constructs did not emerge as a single research project conceived in advance. They appeared sequentially, each responding to new empirical observations while simultaneously expanding the analytical capacity of the newsroom itself. The Insecurity Triad provided a structured lens for understanding the interconnected dimensions of insecurity. The TSD extended that inquiry into a broader theory of institutional authority and governance. The DSI subsequently translated those theoretical insights into an operational framework capable of empirical assessment. Viewed together, this progression revealed something larger than the individual frameworks themselves. It demonstrated that the newsroom had begun to develop an internal capacity for cumulative knowledge production, with each construct building upon and extending the intellectual foundations laid by its predecessor.
The fundamental question therefore shifted from “What new framework has been developed?” to “What kind of newsroom structure makes the systematic development of such frameworks possible?” The answer is the Sundiata Post Model.
A New Institutional Proposition
The Sundiata Post Model does not argue that journalism should become academia, nor does it suggest that scholarly research should migrate from the university to the newsroom. Instead, it advances a new institutional proposition:
The Core Proposition: An independent media institution can systematically integrate high-velocity journalism, original qualitative research, conceptual innovation, and global scholarly dissemination within a single institutional framework, contributing simultaneously to
informed public discourse and the international knowledge ecosystem. The Sundiata Post experience demonstrates the practical viability of this proposition.
This proposition reflects neither a rejection of journalism’s traditional role nor an attempt to merely imitate academic institutions. Rather, it represents a strategic institutional adaptation to the changing architecture of knowledge itself.
In an era when global digital repositories, artificial intelligence discovery layers, academic networks, and news organisations increasingly intersect, the traditional boundaries separating journalism from formal knowledge production have become entirely permeable. The Sundiata Post Model seeks to explore what becomes possible when those boundaries are approached not as rigid barriers, but as unprecedented opportunities for intellectual sovereignty.
The historical journey from Azikiwe and Awolowo to Lippmann and Arendt reveals a long-standing, symbiotic relationship between journalism and ideas. The Sundiata Post Model does not seek to replicate any of those legacy traditions perfectly. It seeks to answer a contemporary institutional question:
What becomes possible when an independent newsroom deliberately organises itself as a primary knowledge-producing institution?
The answer begins with philosophy. The next essay examines structure.
Trust is sacred. Stay seasoned
•Dr. Max Amuchie is a Scholar-Journalist, Media CEO, Lead Researcher at the Sundiata Post Intelligence Unit (SPIU), and an Expert Member and Peer Reviewer at ScienceOpen. He is the architect of The Insecurity Triad framework for African security analysis as well as the Trinity of State Decay theory, and the Decoupling Sovereignty Index (DSI)—original frameworks for understanding, categorising, and measuring conflict, state decay, and sovereignty in the Global South. He writes ‘The Sunday Stew’, a weekly syndicated column on faith, character, and the structural forces that shape society, with a focus on Nigeria, Africa, and the Global South in a changing world.
X (formerly Twitter): @MaxAmuchie | Email: max.a@sundiatapost.com | Tel: +234(0)8053069436
In a quick riposte on Saturday, Dave Umahi, Minister of Works, has cautioned Nigerians to be circumspect in the manner they react to the story of the death of a female student in his home in Ebonyi State, warning against the temptation of jumping to conclusion.
Conveying his position on the highly-volatile matter through Francis Nwaze, his spokesman, Umahi, former Governor of Ebonyi State and a key figure in the government of President Bola Tinubu, said caution was needed to enable the police conduct unfettered investigation into the matter.
It was his response to breaking of how one Mary Habila, a female physiotherapist reportedly died in his palatial home at Uburu, Ohaozara Local Government Area of Ebonyi State, on June 27, hours after arriving the day before.
Nwaze, a Senior Special Assistant on Media and Publicity, specifically cautioned against speculations by “tale bearers,” while conveying the Minister’s shock over the matter and his eagerness for the authorities to get at the root of the matter through forensic investigations.
He wrote in the statement: “The attention of the Media Office of the Honourable Minister of Works, Senator Engr. David Nweze Umahi, has been drawn to a publication by a publication concerning the unfortunate passing of Miss Mary Habila in Uburu, Ebonyi State, alleging that the circumstances surrounding her death were shrouded in secrecy.
“The Honourable Minister received the news with profound shock and sadness and has since extended his heartfelt condolences to the bereaved family. For the avoidance of doubt, immediately the unfortunate incident occurred, appropriate emergency steps were taken. Medical personnel, including the Chief Medical Director of the David Umahi Federal University of Health Sciences, Uburu, were contacted without delay, while the Nigeria Police was promptly notified in accordance with the law.
“Following confirmation of Miss Habila’s passing, the Honourable Minister personally received her parents, conveyed his sincere condolences, and advised that an autopsy be conducted to scientifically establish the exact cause of death. At the time, however, the family declined the recommendation.
“It is important to clarify that Miss Mary Habila and Miss Anita Baski are employees of the David Umahi Federal University of Health Sciences, Uburu, who had been on secondment to the Federal Ministry of Works as physiotherapists for the past three years until the unfortunate passing of Miss Habila.
“Following the recent developments and in the interest of ensuring that the truth is established beyond doubt, the Honourable Minister has again reiterated his position that an autopsy must be conducted. He remains convinced that this is the most credible and responsible path to resolving all questions surrounding the unfortunate incident.
“We therefore urge the public to exercise restraint, refrain from speculation or premature conclusions, and allow the relevant authorities to carry out their responsibilities without interference. At this difficult time, our thoughts and prayers remain with the family of the deceased, and we pray that God grants them the strength to bear this irreparable loss.”
The circumstances that led to the sudden death of Mary Habbila, a Nigerian female student died in the Uburu, Ohaozara Local Government Area of Ebonyi State, home of Dave Umahi, Minister of Works, has now thrown the entire household and environs into serious quandary.
SaharaReporters, which first broke the revealed that the incident, which happened since June 27 this year, has been shrouded in secrecy, with both the Ebonyi State Government and the state police command maintaining silence over the matter.
The incident, the report, added, took place barely a day after Habbila and another woman, Anita Baski, both from Kaduna State, were reportedly brought to the minister’s residence, triggering a police investigation, with the case transferred from the Ohaozara Divisional Police Headquarters to the Ebonyi State Criminal Investigation Department (SCID) in Abakaliki.
Habbila and Baski reportedly arrived at the minister’s residence on June 26 to “attend” to him, only for Habbila to be found dead inside the residence the following morning under circumstances investigators are still trying to establish.
Police sources were quoted by the paper as saying that Jonathan Bawado, a police officer who serves as Senator Umahi’s Personal Assistant and previously worked as his Aide-de-Camp (ADC) during his tenure as Governor of Ebonyi State, alerted medical personnel after Habbila was discovered unresponsive.
Subsequently, a doctor and an ambulance were dispatched to the residence, while Tobechukwu Godwin, Chief Superintendent of Police (CSP) Divisional Police Officer (DPO) of Ohaozara Police Division, was notified of the incident, the report said, adding that at the hospital Chihurumnanya Alo, a Professor and Consultant Public Health Physician, Infectious Diseases Specialist and Chief Medical Director of the David Umahi Federal University Teaching Hospital (DUFUTH), Uburu, was also alerted about the incident.
The police who subsequently conveyed Habbila’s body to a mortuary, were said to have handed over the identification tag attached to Habbila’s to the Ebonyi State Police Command by the said DPO, as part of the ongoing investigation.
SaharaReporters, quoted a senior police officer, with knowledge of the case as saying: “The case has been transferred to the State Criminal Investigation Department in Abakaliki,” but, however declined to provide further details, citing the ongoing investigation.
The Sundiata Post Model (2): Historical and intellectual foundations of a knowledge-producing newsroom
Don’t jump to conclusion! *Umahi speaks on mysterious death of female students!
BREAKING: Mystery death! *Female student dies a day after arriving Umahi’s home!
-
News2 days agoBREAKING: Mystery death! *Female student dies a day after arriving Umahi’s home!
-
News4 weeks agoBREAKING: Troops rescue wife of kidnapped General! *Terrorists flee scene
-
News4 weeks agoBREAKING: Count me out, Okonkwo tells Atiku *Amaechi VP’s choice an insult to Ndigbo
-
News3 weeks agoBREAKING: Court sentences Nigerien, two others to death over terrorism
-
News1 day agoDon’t jump to conclusion! *Umahi speaks on mysterious death of female students!
-
News1 week agoBREAKING: EX-SSG mowed down by gunmen! *He resisted being kidnapped – driver
-
News3 weeks agoAbductors of Oyo teachers panicking, freedom coming for victims soon!
-
News3 weeks agoTwo hours after Igboho’s ‘red-eyes’ to ‘Fulani’ leaders, gunmen free kidnap victims!