Connect with us

News

Oluwatoyin Osho: I didn’t accuse my uncle of N9.8million fraud

Published

on

For years, Abayomi Arodu and Oluwatoyin Osho had lived like brothers. Arodu is Osho’s uncle, being a younger brother to Osho’s mum. They had so strong a relationship that when Arodu took ill sometime in 2009 and wanted to travel to India for a medical procedure, he handed over his family and businesses to Osho. That was because Arodu was unsure of his return, judging from the severity of his ill health.

According to Arodu: “I entrusted all my landed property into his care with the conclusion that I may not make it back to Nigeria. I had thought I would die as a result of the sickness then, but God’s mercy saw me through and preserved my life.”

Advertisement


Arodu said that his nephew had offered him some millions of naira, when he was travelling, which he turned down because his company had already taken care of all his travel expenses with additional funds.

“All I needed was just for him to be there for my family while I was away,” he said.

When he returned after four months, he met with Osho with a view to repaying the loan he had used to support his (Arodu’s) business. He found out that Osho had spent millions of Naira to the tune of N19.8million to sustain the smooth running of the business.

Advertisement


The process of repaying that debt set the ground for what had lingered for 10 years as a family feud between the two men. The matter had gone from Police stations to the court and was wrongly reported by a national newspaper that Arodu duped his nephew of N9.8million.

In reality, Osho had stood in for Arodu by managing his private business, with his personal funds.

Arodu had sought Osho’s understanding on gradual repayment of the loan. Osho had committed the sum of N19.8million, out of which Arodu has paid N10million, while a balance of N9.8m remained.

Advertisement


According to Arodu, Osho refused to come for amicable draft of the loan repayment schedule, even when some family elders intervened.

Osho refused to show up, making it difficult for comfortable terms of payment for him then.

Meanwhile, another family problem arose between the two men, which made the gentleman’s agreement between them to be discarded. Rather, what was a brotherly gesture turned into a quarrel that led them to Police Stations and eventually a magistrate Court in Ogba Lagos.

Advertisement


That was aggravated by Osho, who was also having some personal issues and experiencing some frustrations in his business, which needed money to be sorted out immediately.

Hence, he went to his uncle to claim the balance of his money while both were still recovering from the family feud that was unrelated to the money. That was how the transaction degenerated into a case for police stations and eventually landed in court.

Luckily for the two, the presiding magistrate at that time, after hearing their cases, threw out the matter and told them to go and settle at home as brothers should.

Advertisement


But a reporter of a national newspaper had picked the story and reported that Arodu had duped Osho of N9.8million, a report even Osho himself was shocked to see.

According to Osho: “It was the little family issue that we had that got escalated and my own financial pressures. But from Mowe, Isheri, to Area G Ogba Police Stations and to the Magistrate Court, there was never a day I said my uncle duped me. I only said he was owing me. My statement is still at Area G police station and even court records can show that. I had no single idea why the newspaper said I accused my uncle of defrauding me. That story still baffles me till date. There is no way I could have accused a man, who is like a father to me of duping me. That’s not possible. I maintain till today and even up to the time of going to my grave that my uncle never duped me.”

Asked how he thought the story of the fraud against Arodu came about, Osho said he suspected that some unscrupulous Police officers and some court officials must have twisted the story to that.

Advertisement


“I was even shocked to see the story in a newspaper. I have gone to the newspaper to narrate my story but that does not seem enough. I want to state again that my uncle never duped me of N9.8million. It was a misunderstanding that arose from a family issue that triggered the whole thing, which we have settled at home,” he said.

 

Arodu felt that the story could have landed him in prison and tarnished his reputation as an honest worker and businessman.

Advertisement


However, Osho said at that time, he felt embittered that he wasn’t appreciated for his efforts and love towards his uncle (Arodu) and his immediate family members.

Osho maintained that the police added to the issue, which prompted him to take action against his uncle up to the court. He said he was accused of gun possession, which was not true.

“Again, I felt abandoned by my uncle when I needed him most at the first police station, which was the reason I wrote a petition against him,” he said.

Advertisement


However, Osho is today sorry and still bothered, 10 years after. He believed that he had wronged his uncle beyond bounds. He maintained that he never accused his uncle of defrauding him nor did he arrange for the reporter to come cover the court proceedings.

Rather, he alleged that it was either the reporter picked the story from court when the proceedings was on and made a wrong publication about it or unscrupulous police officers who got the story twisted.

“I never accused my uncle of defrauding me nor did I arrange for any reporter to publish a false report about him. I don’t do the kind of business he does. So, I couldn’t have said I gave him money to buy goods that I know nothing about, for me. It’s just not possible. I didn’t say that at all,” he emphatically stated.

Advertisement


He added that though, he was deeply hurt and was naughty out of frustration, he did not accuse his uncle of defrauding him.

However, the remaining part of the loan (N9.8million)has since been balanced and all grievances settled. The brothers and family members are all now united and living like one happy family that should be.

Osho expressed gratitude to his uncle for putting a closure to the 10-year row in the family by accepting him back as the proverbial father to the prodigal son. “I am grateful to my uncle/father. Words are not enough to convey the weight of my appreciation. I’m also using this same medium to apologise for the inconvenience I might have caused him and his family, especially his image. And I hope he truly finds it easy in his heart to forgive me,” he concluded. He apologised to his uncle, his immediate family and the entire Arodu family.

Advertisement


 

 

Advertisement


Share this story:

News

BREAKING! Appeal Court halts Atiku! Says, Mark can’t be ADC Chairman!

Published

on

Atiku Abubakar seventh attempt at the presidency has been halted by the Court of Appeal in Abuja, which held that David Mark is not the fit and proper person to assume the position of the National Chairman of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) – the camp that produced the former Vice President as candidate of the party.

Hours after the former VP, who had attempted the bid for the nation’s number one job and is on the seventh edition by virtue of his nomination for the 2027 presidential election by the Mark, agreed with the position of the Federal High Court, Abuja, restraining the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from recognising or participating in any state congresses organised by the former Senate President.

Advertisement


Justice Okon Abang, while reading the lead-judgement in the three-to-one split, said there was no reason for the appellate court to set aside the April 29 order by the lower court, adding that Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, who barred Mark and his executives from interfering with the tenure and functions of the party’s elected state executives, was in order.

Agreeing that the responsibility for conducting state congresses of political parties rested with elected state executive committees and not with the national leadership, he ordered INEC not to recognise the executive produced as a result of the defective process.

Though his position was echoed by Donatus Okorowo in the majority, Justice Abba Mohammed, who disagreed sharply, with a dissenting judgment, held that the case that precipitated the restraining order bordered on a non-justiciable internal affair of a political party, adding that lower court was wrong to have assumed jurisdiction to entertain the matter.

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

News

Lest we forget: Ibom Deep Seaport and Senator Godswill Akpabio — A prophecy foretold?

Published

on

By Ken Harries Esq

Some speeches disappear with the applause that greets them. Others acquire greater force with the passing of time. Their words do not change; history simply grows into them. Years later, they resonate with fresh power, not because they have been rewritten, but because the nation has finally arrived at the realities they foresaw.
One such speech was delivered in April 2012 at the 2nd South South Economic Summit in Asaba. There, Senator Godswill Akpabio, then Governor of Akwa Ibom State, presented what many regarded as an ambitious vision for maritime corridor and blue economy development.

Advertisement


Speaking before political leaders, investors, and development stakeholders at the 2nd South South Economic Summit in Asaba, Akpabio outlined what many regarded as an ambitious vision for a model state in particular and regional development in general. Long before the Ibom Deep Seaport became a national priority, he argued that Nigeria needed new maritime gateways, integrated industrial clusters, aviation maintenance facilities, and modern logistics infrastructure to unlock economic growth. His vision was not simply about building a port; it was about creating an economic ecosystem capable of transforming a region and strengthening the nation’s competitiveness.

Fourteen years later, those remarks read less like political advocacy and more like an economic blueprint whose underlying logic has steadily been vindicated by events and times. Looking back today, his address appears almost prophetic—not because it predicted the future in mystical terms, but because Nigeria has gradually grown into the ideas it contained.

Truly visionary speeches never fade; they gather strength with time. This one deserves renewed attention, not because every prediction has materialised exactly as envisioned, but because it reveals a quality increasingly scarce in public leadership: the ability to think beyond electoral cycles.
Nigeria has never lacked projects. What it has often lacked are leaders willing to imagine the infrastructure of tomorrow while grappling with the demands of today. Akpabio’s vision was shaped by precisely that instinct.

Advertisement


At a time when public discourse was largely focused on roads and recurrent expenditure, he spoke instead of logistics corridors, industrial ecosystems, aviation maintenance, manufacturing clusters, export processing zones, maritime and blue economy opportunities, and security reform—not as isolated initiatives, but as interconnected pillars of national competitiveness.

His vision for the then proposed Ibaka Deep Seaport, now known as the Ibom Deep Seaport, best illustrates this broader philosophy. Rather than presenting it as another state prestige project, he framed it as a strategic response to structural inefficiencies in Nigeria’s maritime sector and the wider economy. He argued that the Lagos ports were already burdened by severe congestion, with vessels waiting for extended periods to berth, driving up costs, disrupting supply chains, and delaying the delivery of critical imports, including pharmaceuticals.

His objective, however, was never to rival Lagos, but to complement it. The distinction is fundamental. No major trading nation concentrates all its strategic maritime infrastructure within a single corridor. Successful economies spread capacity, ease bottlenecks, and create multiple gateways through which commerce can flow efficiently. Nigeria has long recognised this principle in policy documents; Akpabio was among the few public leaders articulating it so clearly more than a decade ago.

Advertisement


Equally significant was his emphasis on geography. He reminded his audience that Ibaka possessed a naturally deep coastline requiring little or no dredging, with water depths of approximately fifteen to seventeen metres. According to his account, the location had been identified as suitable for a deep seaport as far back as 1963, yet decades passed without meaningful progress. His observation that “being a minority area, there was nobody to push it” reflected a broader concern that strategic national investments have too often been influenced by political considerations rather than economic merit.

Whether one agrees entirely with that assessment is, in many respects, secondary. The larger point is that Akpabio consistently argued that national infrastructure should be driven by economic logic, strategic necessity, and long-term national interest rather than sentiment or political convenience. More than a decade later, that remains a lesson Nigeria is still striving to learn.

Yet, to see the 2012 Asaba address merely as a speech about a deep seaport is to miss its larger significance. The Ibom Deep Seaport was never presented as an end in itself. It was conceived as the anchor of a much broader economic ecosystem—a platform around which industries, manufacturing, aviation, logistics, free trade, and investment could flourish.

Advertisement


Akpabio envisioned the acquisition of about 14,000 hectares of land to support a self-sustaining industrial city comprising fertiliser and ammonia plants, refining capacity, manufacturing facilities, and a Free Trade Zone. What development economists today describe as industrial clustering was already embedded in his thinking. The port was simply the gateway.

That broader vision deserves a discussion of its own. Today, Ibom Deep Seaport in that Asaba Speech has berthed.

•Ken Harries Esq is an Abuja-based Development Communication Strategist.

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

News

Forgery: Nnaji, ex-Minister, regains freedom *Barred from leaving Nigeria!

Published

on

Justice Joyce Abdulmalik of the Federal High Court in Abuja, on Monday, granted allowed Uche Nnaji former Minister of Science and Technology, to go home, on the condition of a N20million bail bond.

Nnaji, who was arrested at Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport (NAIA), Abuja on July 1 by officials of the Independent Corrupt Practices and other Offences Commission (ICPC), while returning to Abuja, was granted bail after pleading not guilty to a six-count certificate forgery charge.

Advertisement


The anti-corruption agency alleged that Nnaji, Minister of Science and Technology between August 16, 2023 and October 6, 2025, when he resigned office after a crisis regarding his university degree broke out is currently the governorship candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Enugu for in the 2027 general election, squaring up against Peter Mba, the incumbent, who incidentally won his office in 2023 under the same PDP, before defecting to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

He was accused of forging his academic credentials, especially a degree certificate from the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN) alongside presenting a bogus National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) discharge certificate during his ministerial screening process in 2023.

At the proceedings on Monday, the former Minister pleaded not guilty to the charges, and following an application by James Onoja (SAN), his lawyer, was granted to bail in the sum of N20 million with one surety in the like sum, who must also be a civil servant resident in Abuja, not be below grade level 15.

Advertisement


The court, which ordered the surety to depose to an affidavit of means, mandated the former Minister to also surrender his international passport and not travel outside the country without permission, while fixing September 21 for the commencement of the trial.

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024. WhirlwindNews