The Supreme Court, on Friday declared the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), a legal entity in the eyes of the Nigerian constitution, ending the legal challenges against the anti-corruption agency founded in 2002, under President Olusegun Obasanjo.
The status of the body was attacked recently by a group of 16 states of the federation, who filed a suit against the Attorney-General of the Federation, challenging the constitutionality of the Acts establishing it and two other sister-bodies.
Though many of the states later withdrew from the suit, the apex court, went ahead to deliver judgement on Friday, legalising not only the EFCC, but the Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission (ICPC) and the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU), equally sued alongside.
Justice Uwani Abba-Aji, leading other six colleagues in the judgement, held that the states were completely wrong in holding that EFCC established by an act of the National Assembly, was an illegal and unlawful body, adding that the EFCC Act, which was not a treaty but a convention, did not need the ratification of the houses of assembly.
The verdict, which came on the heels of the apex court, first dismissing all the objections of the Federal Government to the suit filed by the states, say Abba-Aji stating that the case was against the Attorney-General of the Federation and not any of the agencies mentioned, hence, the Supreme Court had jurisdiction to determine it.
The states, which included Ondo, Edo, Oyo, Ogun, Nassarawa, Kebbi, Katsina, Sokoto, Jigawa, Enugu, Benue, Anambra, Plateau, Cross-River and Niger, had pleaded with the Supreme Court to order the scrapping of the anti-graft agency.
However, at the resumed hearing on October 22, Imo, Bauchi, and Osun states joined the suit as co-plaintiffs while Anambra, Ebonyi, and Adamawa states announced their decisions to withdraw their suits.
In their argument, the states had relied on the fact that the Constitution is the supreme law and that any law that was inconsistent with it is null and void, adding that the Supreme Court, in Dr. Joseph Nwobike Vs Federal Republic of Nigeria, had held that it was a UN Convention against corruption that was reduced into the EFCC Establishment Act and that in enacting the law in 2004, the provision of Section 12 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, was not followed.
Stressing that the provision of Section 12 must be complied with in bringing a convention into Nigerian law, the states maintained that based on the Constitution’s provision, the majority of the state Houses of Assembly needed to agree to bring the convention in before passing the EFCC Act and others, but that was allegedly never done.
Besides, they argued that the law, as enacted, could not be applied to states that never approved of it, in accordance with the provisions of the Nigerian constitution, adding that any institution so formed should be regarded as illegal.