Connect with us

News

Tinubu: The unravelling of a bigot

Published

on

By Onyema Omenuwa

Bola Ahmed Tinubu has been unravelled. As a bigot, that is. Eventually, and completely, it needs to be added. And it is all due to the hypocritical kind of politics that he plays, particularly in Lagos State where he holds sway as the alpha and omega of politics. Significantly, his unrelenting and desperate quest to become the President of Nigeria led to his unravelling. Though he has succeeded in that regard, since he is today the President and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the success came at the great cost of shattering the façade of progressivism that has all along defined his politics.

Advertisement


Tinubu projects progressivism as his political worldview. But presently in Lagos State, the “Igbo Must Go” hashtag has become something of a mantra across social media platforms for the Yoruba residents of Lagos and their supporters. That is starkly anti-progressive by any stretch of imagination, and it is happening in Tinubu’s Lagos. “Residents” is used advisedly in this context because not every Yoruba in Lagos is an indigene of Lagos State or a “Lagosian,” as the indigenes of the state delight in describing themselves. And that is the irony. Indigenous Lagosians and, in all fairness to them, the teeming Yoruba of liberal disposition, have distanced themselves from and have been speaking against this divisive campaign, which tends to position Lagos as a xenophobic enclave for the Igbo. Such an open repudiation is quite reassuring. Chief Bode George for instance has said that the anti-Igbo campaign “is arrant nonsense… Those who are proposing this nonsense have no bearing and no family connection to Lagos. I am saying it as a Lagosian.”

Yet, the campaign is real, and the bigoted campaigners are very vociferous. They have registered a notorious presence on all social media platforms, literally strutting and fanning the embers of hatred against the Igbo race. In all that, silence had been the word from Tinubu; not to mention the Babajide Sanwo-Olu-led Lagos State Government, which he installed. It was only on August 4 that President Tinubu issued a feeble condemnation of the campaign, as part of his equally half-hearted nationwide address following the “End Bad Governance in Nigeria” protests. Sanwo-Olu had reacted to the campaign in the same lax manner.

And to think that Tinubu himself ignited the “nonsense,” by the inordinate pursuit of his ambition. For the perceptive mind, the anti-Igbo sentiment got invigorated in Lagos during the 2015 electioneering, with that infamous outburst or threat by Oba Rilwan Akiolu of Lagos to have the Igbo population in Lagos drowned in the lagoon, if they voted against Akinwunmi Ambode, who was Tinubu’s candidate for the governorship election of the state. In no time, the sentiment became so widespread, and what obtains today is sheer display of ethnophobia against the Igbo, comparable only to the xenophobic attitude of South Africans against Nigerians in that country. It was probably only during the civil war years that the Igbo had to put up with the kind of animosity as is currently exhibited towards them in Lagos. On a daily basis, social media platforms brim with very terrible ethnic slurs by persons of Yoruba extraction, and their supporters, against the Igbo.

Advertisement


Such displays of ethnic prejudice can be overlooked, if it is emanating from the ignorant or unenlightened class of people. But that is not the case. Educated and enlightened folks also amplify the anti-Igbo rhetoric. However, it must continuously be emphasised that Tinubu’s ambition (which he has achieved anyway), and nothing else, is at the root of it. Events lend credence to this assertion. It bears repeating and it is unarguable that Tinubu is the ultimate power in Lagos politics. For starters, he was two-term governor for eight years and thereafter has maintained a vice-like grip on the state’s affairs. Without absolute loyalty to him, no one can attain any political height in Lagos State. To become governors, Babatunde Fashola, Ambode and the incumbent, Sanwo-Olu danced to no other tune than Tinubu’s. Ambode who dared to assert himself after assuming office ultimately lost out bigly and is today something of a pariah in Lagos politics.

Because of Tinubu’s staying power, some have credited him with a mastery of political strategies. Yet for him, the fear of losing control over Lagos is real. And the Igbo population in Lagos has the potential to make it happen. The possibility of the clichéd parlance, politics is a game of numbers can be taken advantage of by a Tinubu rival or an opposition party in Lagos State using the Igbo population. The consciousness of this possibility makes Tinubu and his cohorts who aspire to elective office very uncomfortable. But the fear need not be, for an acclaimed strategist. All that the man who bears the vanity appellation, “Jagaban.” needs do to sway the Igbo votes to his advantage is woo the Igbo voters. But no, threat seems to be the very strategy he has mastered, and he deploys it maximally. Which progressive does that?

When the Oba of Lagos threatened the Igbo, Tinubu was not credited with any statement of disapproval of that reckless utterance. His silence was very readily interpreted as an approval and that enabled the activation of latent bigotry that a motely of Yoruba characters now profess and propagate. The 2023 electioneering for which Tinubu was the APC presidential candidate fed the anti-Igbo sentiment got more fillip. With the “master strategist” fighting the political battle of his life, the likes of Bayo Onanuga ran amok. Using majorly his X handle @aonanuga1956, as Tinubu’s spokesperson, Onanuga regularly churned out a no-holds-barred hate-laden comments against the Igbo, bragging that “I don’t owe anyone any apology.” Not a few commentators had to remind of the genesis of the Rwanda genocide whose imagery still scares humanity. It happened largely because of reckless utterances against an ethnic group such as being spewed by him. Then, on assuming office as President, Tinubu appointed Onanuga as spokesperson of his Government. That can only be a reward for a job well done.

Advertisement


The anti-Igbo expressions tend to convey the impression that the Lagos Igbo residents characteristically interfere in Lagos politics beyond the limits allowed by and in a democracy. But that is not true. What is true is that the Igbo numerical strength in Lagos is second only to the Yoruba indigenous population. That number can naturally determine the outcome of any election. For context, Tinubu’s fear is reasonably informed by previous voting patterns, especially beginning 2015, that his party is not the choice of the Igbo in Lagos. He was trounced in the presidential election in Lagos State, and till date the debate hasn’t abated that his party was heading for a greater trouncing in the governorship election but for some unspeakable manipulations and intrusions perpetrated on his behalf, including the deployment of the Oro traditional cult to prevent the Igbo from voting.

So, the resort to savage force by his supporters to suppress the Igbo votes was borne out of his own desperation. And in the bid to stop the Igbo, all actions were considered fair: Street urchins and thugs, a cult group, as already alluded, were unleashed on the Igbo, with even some educated elite offering themselves to propagate the anti-Igbo rhetoric. In all this frenzy, they cared less about what would become of the Lagos image. What mattered was Tinubu’s was for interest to be served. Lagos is unarguably the most cosmopolitan Nigerian city, featuring considerable attributes of civilisation, if not modernity. That is the city where one man’s desperation to hold steadfastly on to power is threatening to destroy its potential for exponential growth.

One otherwise insignificant social media account, @Lagospedia, on X took Onanuga’s hate propaganda some notches higher by its enthusiastic but ferocious propagation of Igbophobia. In its efforts, it spawned other similar accounts like @Lagospidia, @Lagos_IBILE and @YorubaGuard. Though all the accounts have been reportedly deactivated on X, a sole agenda united them: A crusade against the Igbo population/interest in Lagos. On July 27, 2024, @Lagospedia posts assumed a dangerous dimension with its call for a xenophobic protest against the Igbo from August 20 to 30. The handler specifically promoted hashtag IgboMustGo, demanding the Igbo’s ejection from the southwest. As alluded, Lagos State Governor, Jide Sanwo-Olu only feebly condemned the crusade via a statement on August 1 where he urged Lagosians “to ignore the post and any post of that nature”. Sanwo-Olu surely does not need any reminder that it is in his Lagos that the Igbo population and their businesses have been attacked over and over, without any consequence.

Advertisement


The agenda to set the Yoruba population against the Igbo in Lagos and by extension the entire southwest is being pursued with palpable vigour, and it bears repeating that it is done with President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s tacit encouragement. Concerned authorities may turn a blind eye and deaf ear to what is happening in Lagos, but it is worth mentioning that such expressions of anti-ethnic sentiments threaten the constitutional right of Nigerians to live anywhere in the country. Today, it is the Igbo. Tomorrow, for as long as Tinubu continues to hold sway, it will surely be any other ethnic group in Lagos, unless they don’t insist on exercising their franchise without let or hinderance.

But overall, events have exposed the Tinubu brand of politics for what it is and cast him properly. Neither he nor any of his protégés can in all honesty lay claim to progressivism. Interestingly, the deception about Tinubu’s worldview of progressive politics had stuck in public consciousness for far too long that indeed no doubt existed about his commitment to the principle. But deception, like all pseudofacts, has an expiry time. Bob Marley’s immortal words ring true here: “You can fool some people sometimes, but you can’t fool all the people all the time.” The unravelling of Tinubu though long in coming because of his adept at masterfully projecting a façade eventually did come. Unless the meaning of progressive as used in democratic politics has been so elastically adjusted as to accommodate bigotry as a connotation, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the politician who is today the President of Nigeria, should not have his name and his politics associated with that word or concept. At least, not anymore.

He has unravelled and should stop laying claim to progressive credentials. The unfortunate drift occasioned by his political predilection deserves nothing but blanket condemnation, otherwise it would be institutionalised. It is a bad advertisement for the “unity in diversity” mantra that the country’s political leaders proclaim.

Advertisement


Omenuwa, a lawyer, is a commentator on national issues

 

 

Advertisement


 

 

 

Advertisement


Share this story:

News

BREAKING! Appeal Court halts Atiku! Says, Mark can’t be ADC Chairman!

Published

on

Atiku Abubakar seventh attempt at the presidency has been halted by the Court of Appeal in Abuja, which held that David Mark is not the fit and proper person to assume the position of the National Chairman of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) – the camp that produced the former Vice President as candidate of the party.

Hours after the former VP, who had attempted the bid for the nation’s number one job and is on the seventh edition by virtue of his nomination for the 2027 presidential election by the Mark, agreed with the position of the Federal High Court, Abuja, restraining the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from recognising or participating in any state congresses organised by the former Senate President.

Advertisement


Justice Okon Abang, while reading the lead-judgement in the three-to-one split, said there was no reason for the appellate court to set aside the April 29 order by the lower court, adding that Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, who barred Mark and his executives from interfering with the tenure and functions of the party’s elected state executives, was in order.

Agreeing that the responsibility for conducting state congresses of political parties rested with elected state executive committees and not with the national leadership, he ordered INEC not to recognise the executive produced as a result of the defective process.

Though his position was echoed by Donatus Okorowo in the majority, Justice Abba Mohammed, who disagreed sharply, with a dissenting judgment, held that the case that precipitated the restraining order bordered on a non-justiciable internal affair of a political party, adding that lower court was wrong to have assumed jurisdiction to entertain the matter.

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

News

Lest we forget: Ibom Deep Seaport and Senator Godswill Akpabio — A prophecy foretold?

Published

on

By Ken Harries Esq

Some speeches disappear with the applause that greets them. Others acquire greater force with the passing of time. Their words do not change; history simply grows into them. Years later, they resonate with fresh power, not because they have been rewritten, but because the nation has finally arrived at the realities they foresaw.
One such speech was delivered in April 2012 at the 2nd South South Economic Summit in Asaba. There, Senator Godswill Akpabio, then Governor of Akwa Ibom State, presented what many regarded as an ambitious vision for maritime corridor and blue economy development.

Advertisement


Speaking before political leaders, investors, and development stakeholders at the 2nd South South Economic Summit in Asaba, Akpabio outlined what many regarded as an ambitious vision for a model state in particular and regional development in general. Long before the Ibom Deep Seaport became a national priority, he argued that Nigeria needed new maritime gateways, integrated industrial clusters, aviation maintenance facilities, and modern logistics infrastructure to unlock economic growth. His vision was not simply about building a port; it was about creating an economic ecosystem capable of transforming a region and strengthening the nation’s competitiveness.

Fourteen years later, those remarks read less like political advocacy and more like an economic blueprint whose underlying logic has steadily been vindicated by events and times. Looking back today, his address appears almost prophetic—not because it predicted the future in mystical terms, but because Nigeria has gradually grown into the ideas it contained.

Truly visionary speeches never fade; they gather strength with time. This one deserves renewed attention, not because every prediction has materialised exactly as envisioned, but because it reveals a quality increasingly scarce in public leadership: the ability to think beyond electoral cycles.
Nigeria has never lacked projects. What it has often lacked are leaders willing to imagine the infrastructure of tomorrow while grappling with the demands of today. Akpabio’s vision was shaped by precisely that instinct.

Advertisement


At a time when public discourse was largely focused on roads and recurrent expenditure, he spoke instead of logistics corridors, industrial ecosystems, aviation maintenance, manufacturing clusters, export processing zones, maritime and blue economy opportunities, and security reform—not as isolated initiatives, but as interconnected pillars of national competitiveness.

His vision for the then proposed Ibaka Deep Seaport, now known as the Ibom Deep Seaport, best illustrates this broader philosophy. Rather than presenting it as another state prestige project, he framed it as a strategic response to structural inefficiencies in Nigeria’s maritime sector and the wider economy. He argued that the Lagos ports were already burdened by severe congestion, with vessels waiting for extended periods to berth, driving up costs, disrupting supply chains, and delaying the delivery of critical imports, including pharmaceuticals.

His objective, however, was never to rival Lagos, but to complement it. The distinction is fundamental. No major trading nation concentrates all its strategic maritime infrastructure within a single corridor. Successful economies spread capacity, ease bottlenecks, and create multiple gateways through which commerce can flow efficiently. Nigeria has long recognised this principle in policy documents; Akpabio was among the few public leaders articulating it so clearly more than a decade ago.

Advertisement


Equally significant was his emphasis on geography. He reminded his audience that Ibaka possessed a naturally deep coastline requiring little or no dredging, with water depths of approximately fifteen to seventeen metres. According to his account, the location had been identified as suitable for a deep seaport as far back as 1963, yet decades passed without meaningful progress. His observation that “being a minority area, there was nobody to push it” reflected a broader concern that strategic national investments have too often been influenced by political considerations rather than economic merit.

Whether one agrees entirely with that assessment is, in many respects, secondary. The larger point is that Akpabio consistently argued that national infrastructure should be driven by economic logic, strategic necessity, and long-term national interest rather than sentiment or political convenience. More than a decade later, that remains a lesson Nigeria is still striving to learn.

Yet, to see the 2012 Asaba address merely as a speech about a deep seaport is to miss its larger significance. The Ibom Deep Seaport was never presented as an end in itself. It was conceived as the anchor of a much broader economic ecosystem—a platform around which industries, manufacturing, aviation, logistics, free trade, and investment could flourish.

Advertisement


Akpabio envisioned the acquisition of about 14,000 hectares of land to support a self-sustaining industrial city comprising fertiliser and ammonia plants, refining capacity, manufacturing facilities, and a Free Trade Zone. What development economists today describe as industrial clustering was already embedded in his thinking. The port was simply the gateway.

That broader vision deserves a discussion of its own. Today, Ibom Deep Seaport in that Asaba Speech has berthed.

•Ken Harries Esq is an Abuja-based Development Communication Strategist.

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

News

Forgery: Nnaji, ex-Minister, regains freedom *Barred from leaving Nigeria!

Published

on

Justice Joyce Abdulmalik of the Federal High Court in Abuja, on Monday, granted allowed Uche Nnaji former Minister of Science and Technology, to go home, on the condition of a N20million bail bond.

Nnaji, who was arrested at Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport (NAIA), Abuja on July 1 by officials of the Independent Corrupt Practices and other Offences Commission (ICPC), while returning to Abuja, was granted bail after pleading not guilty to a six-count certificate forgery charge.

Advertisement


The anti-corruption agency alleged that Nnaji, Minister of Science and Technology between August 16, 2023 and October 6, 2025, when he resigned office after a crisis regarding his university degree broke out is currently the governorship candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Enugu for in the 2027 general election, squaring up against Peter Mba, the incumbent, who incidentally won his office in 2023 under the same PDP, before defecting to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

He was accused of forging his academic credentials, especially a degree certificate from the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN) alongside presenting a bogus National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) discharge certificate during his ministerial screening process in 2023.

At the proceedings on Monday, the former Minister pleaded not guilty to the charges, and following an application by James Onoja (SAN), his lawyer, was granted to bail in the sum of N20 million with one surety in the like sum, who must also be a civil servant resident in Abuja, not be below grade level 15.

Advertisement


The court, which ordered the surety to depose to an affidavit of means, mandated the former Minister to also surrender his international passport and not travel outside the country without permission, while fixing September 21 for the commencement of the trial.

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024. WhirlwindNews