President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, on Tuesday presented several visa approvals and details of some trips to the United States of America up to 2021, as a proof that he was not a fugitive in the country, where he claimed to have lived permanently previously.
The presentations were made at the Presidential Election Petitions Court (PEPC), where Atiku Abubakar and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) are not only challenging his declaration as the winner of the 2023 presidential election, but his eligibility to contest in the first place.
Tinubu, who was declared the winner of the election by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on March 1, six days after the election held on February 25, was sworn in as President on May 29 as Nigeria’s 16th President, replacing his predecessor, Muhammadu Buhari.
Atiku who hinged part of his challenge against the President’s eligibility on the forfeiture of $460,000 alleged proceeds of criminal drug deals by the former Governor of Lagos State, to the US authorities, had put up spirited efforts to bar him from tendering the documents.
Regardless, the five-man PEPC panel, headed by Justice Haruna Tsammani admitted them as exhibits, including the Chicago State University credentials, where he claimed to have obtained his university certificate together with the admission letter offered to him byt the institution among others.
Wole Olanipekun, his lead lawyer, who tendered the credentials also provided his American visa documents to prove that he visited the United States unhindered between 2011 and 2021, as well as all documents of the Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS) which cleared him for the US trips.
Besides, Tinubu’s legal team, also tendered a letter by the US Embassy, dated April 4, 2003, containing a response to a letter from the Nigeria Police Force dated February 3, 2003, which allegedly cleared the President of having criminal records in their country, which was also admitted in evidence.
It was also on the same day that INEC and the All Progressives Congress (APC), who are the first and third respondents in the petition did not object to the admission of all the documents.
Besides the educational records, the court further admitted an originating summons of a suit instituted at the Supreme Court by the Attorneys General of Adamawa, Akwa Ibom, Bayelsa, Delta, Edo And Sokoto states challenging the educational background of Tinubu to stand for the 2023 presidential election.
Having laid the documentary evidence to establish its case, lawyers to the President asked for an adjournment to enable them to call oral witnesses.
Earlier in the day, the electoral umpire closed its defence in the petition filed by the Labour Party after calling one witness at the Tribunal.
The witness, Lawrence Bayode, an ICT expert, admitted that some of the results downloaded from INEC’s portal were blurred, however, insisted under cross-examination that the results of the presidential election released by the commission are authentic.
But the lawyer to the Labour Party, Patrick Ikwueto disagreed, saying the results cannot be authentic when they are largely unreadable.