Connect with us

News

Senate goes after IG over missing 3,900 firearms, ₦1.136 billion, from police coffers

Published

on

Kayode Egbetokun, Inspector General of Police (IGP), must be busy going through the files at the Sir Louis Edet House, at this moment to gather more facts about the whereabouts of a whopping N1.136 billion and 3,900 firearms said to be missing from the custody of the Nigerian Police Force (NPF).

This is to enable him convince Senators in the Committee on Public Accounts, who have vowed to get to the bottom of the matter, despite the attempt by the police leadership to assure that there was no cause for alarm at a heated session on Tuesday where Egbetokun, leading the police hierarchy tried on that score earlier.

The committee while inquiring on multiple cases of reports of irregularities, pointed to the unclean financial reports and missing firearms, as part of its review of the Auditor-General’s report, among eight major infractions, pointing out that among the missing firearms were AK-47 rifles, believed to be in the hands of criminal elements.

Abdul Suleiman, Assistant Inspector General of Police (AIG-Budget), who took the darts on behalf of the force, after the IGP introduced him to the committee as equipped to handle their inquiries, during the session, had tried to assure the lawmakers that nothing was amiss, while responding to the audit queries.

Advertisement

With voices rising and amid tensions, which arose when some lawmakers disagreed on how to proceed, Abdul Ningi called for an executive session to discuss the matter privately and later stormed out of the meeting.

On the demand by the committee chairman that the AIG disclosed the whereabouts of the missing firearms, as it was of national importance, police boss pleaded for discretion, stating that discussions on police firepower should not be made public.

“The police will not allow these weapons to go missing at any cost, but this is a security matter best discussed privately,” he said.

With many lawmakers insisting on public accountability on the matter, Victor Umeh, Labour Party (LP) member representing Anambra Central Joel Onawakpo-Thomas, All Progressives Congress (APC), Delta South, sided with the chairman, disagreeing with calls for a closed-door session.

Umeh, who criticised the police for failing to recover the missing weapons in the face of rising insecurity across the country, said: “Thousands of AK-47s are missing at a time when insecurity is at its peak. The police should have been able to trace these arms. If over 3,900 rifles are unaccounted for, it means our security is compromised. Claiming it’s a ‘security issue’ without providing answers only raises more concerns.”

Advertisement

Adams Oshiomhole (APC, Edo North) who also assailed the police over the matter, insisting that the officers responsible must be identified, arrested, and prosecuted, added: “The least we expect is for you to tell us that the arms have been traced to officers who were responsible.

“must be arrested and paraded—just as the police do to ordinary Nigerians. There should be no two sets of laws in this country. These arms were procured to protect Nigerians, yet they have ended up in unknown hands. The police must account for them, and those responsible must face the law. We will not waive this issue.”

The committee, which also questioned the police over eight audit queries, including an allegation of N1.1bn in contract splitting—a violation of Nigeria’s Public Procurement Act, directed the police to provide detailed explanations regarding irregular contract awards flagged in the Auditor General’s report.

After a voice vote which went in favour of the majority, the session continued overtly, with the police explaining that some of the weapons were derived from officers killed while their weapons were carted away, adding that no arms were unaccounted for.

The Committee, which however pooh-poohed the explanation, as completely lame and dissatisfactory insisted that Kayode Egbetokun, Inspector General of Police (IGP) must appear before the members on Monday to further explain the situation.

Advertisement

Share this story:

News

Obikeze, globally-acclaimed medical doctor, becomes Healthnomics’ MD-CEO

Published

on

Obioma Obikeze, an internationally-acclaimed medical doctor will on April 1, assume duties as its new Managing Director and Chief Executive officer (MD-CEO) of Healthnomics HMO Plc, in a move the organisation, said is to tap his huge experience in healthcare policy and financing as well as strategic leadership and expertise in health insurance and managed care operations.

A statement by the organisation, announcing the appointment, cited Obikeze’s background including his transformative roles at the Federal Medical Centre Yenagoa, where he led significant operational enhancements in health insurance and managed care programmes, saying his commitment to excellence in healthcare leadership remained evident from his recent tenure as Acting Head of Clinical Services and Training at his institution.

The statement, signed by Kenneth N. Ozoilo, a Professor and Chairman, Board of Directors, said further relished the quality of the new organisation’s boss, saying with a medical degree from the University of Nigeria, a fellowship of the West African College of Physicians, and a master’s degree in epidemiology and medical statistics from the University of Ibadan, fitted perfectly into the company’s desires and mandate.

“Obikeze was also a World Bank Exchange Scholar at the Heller School for Social Policy and Management at Brandeis University, Massachusetts, USA, graduating with a master of science (MS) in International Health Policy and Management. He also holds certifications in Health Care Financing for Universal Health Coverage from prestigious institutions like the World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, and Heidelberg University, Germany.

Advertisement

“We are pleased to have Dr. Obioma Obikeze lead our team. His exceptional expertise, track record, and uncommon commitment make him the perfect candidate to guide our organization towards impactful healthcare solutions for our clients,” Ozoilo, said.

On his part, the new MD-CEO, was quoted as saying: “I am thrilled to lead Healthnomics HMO Plc on our mission to redefine healthcare quality through responsible and accountable purchasing arrangements. Our dedicated team is focused on enhancing health outcomes, elevating the patient experience, and fostering positive collaborations and accountability with our stakeholders.”

Ozoilo, who described the company as described as a visionary Health Maintenance Organisation driven by its mission to enhance access to quality and affordable healthcare services to individuals, families, and corporate organisations at affordable costs. We work to improve health outcomes, enhance responsible patient experience, and make a positive impact on our communities.

Advertisement
Share this story:
Continue Reading

News

I don’t regret my insult on Oby Ezekwesili, she deserved it – Nwaebonyi

Published

on

Onyekachi Nwaebonyi, Senator representing Ebonyi North Senatorial District, at the National Assembly, is still talking tough hours after raining expletives on Oby Ezekwesili, former Minister of Education, calling her a thug, an old woman with smelly mouth among others during an engagement in the Senate, on Tuesday.

The ugly encounter took place at the sitting of the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions during the commencement of hearing on the petition of sexual harassment brought by Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, the Senator representing Kogi Central against Godswill Akpabio, Senate President.

Contrary to the belief in some quarters that he spoke in the heat of the moment and on reflection would be regret the words he used at the former Minister, before then Vice President of the World Bank for Africa, Nwebonyi, palpably still burning with anger, told his host on Politics Today, a public affairs programme on Channels Television on Tuesday evening, that he had no such regrets.

Justifying his obstinate position, he accused the former Minister of bringing the insults on herself deservedly for ordering him to shut up, even when she knew she was speaking to a Senator of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, adding that such insult to his person would never be allowed.

Advertisement

Hear him: “It started when she was asked to be an oath because she said she was a witness. She said, ‘no she can’t be on oath, she can’t oath.’ As a person, I said I am willing to be sworn on oath so that I can give my own evidence. I was addressing the presiding office. She turned to me and said, ‘Will you shut up your mouth, you are a hooligan.”

Absolving himself of blame at the choice of his word in which he thundered: “How can I regret the scenario? I gave it to her. Is it fair for her to address me that way? As a former minister of the federal republic and a grandmother, ask her first.”

Share this story:
Continue Reading

News

Why I asked Nwaebonyi to shut up – Oby Ezekwesili

Published

on

Oby Ezekwesili, former Minister of Education, on Tuesday, gave further details on the altercation between her and Onyekachi Nwaebonyi, Senator representing Ebonyi North, at the National Assembly, during the commencement of hearing of the sexual harassment case filed against Godswill Akpabio, Senate President by Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, Senator representing Kogi West.

At the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions, the two had engaged each other in a shouting match, using unprintable names, with the Senator virtually going overboard to as much as calling the former Vice President of the World Bank, a whore.

A guest at Prime Time, a public affairs programme of ARISE NEWS Network, hours after the incident, the former Minister admitted telling the Senator to shut-up, but explained that it was because the team of Akpoti-Uduaghan, was overly stressing Senate rules over the constitution and giving undue preference to the Akpabio camp.

Giving a detailed account of the encounter, she said: “I was there as the Chair of the global body known as the Women Political Leaders. It is based in Brussels, but it is a global body for all women who have been Presidents or former Presidents, Prime Ministers, parliamentarians and members of cabinet of countries.

Advertisement

“So, it is a global flagship for women political leadership. And so, I was there as a witness on her side on the basis of the expert knowledge that we have over this issue around the world. It is based on data that this is a problem. One out of every three women, has faced one form of sexual-based violence or the other. And so, a lot of countries are paying serious attentions to it, because it is inimical to the society.”

The former Minister who was present at the hearing alongside Abiola Akiyode-Afolabi, lawyer to Zubairu Yakubu, who raised the petition on behalf of the Kogi Senator, one in the four females in the 10th Senate, narrated how the petitioners raised the issue of bias against the committee, said she became more displeased, when the committee tried to dismiss the Natasha team as unserious.

“In fact the words they used was that ‘we do serious things here, we don’t have time for unserious things.’ At that time, I had my hand up and I said, ‘I actually think that was a wrong use of words, we are not unserious people, this is a serious matter.’ Many conversations went on. Eventually, the Senate Ethics Committee, decided that based on the fact that the petitioner was saying that he wasn’t going to go into his main petition until they assured him that on the two objections that he had, they said, it meant we were not ready to engage on the matter.

“Then, suddenly, they also said, by the way, this matter is sub-judice because there are two cases in court and they mentioned the case of the wife of the Senate President and that on the basis of that they actually really shouldn’t… it was at that point that Dr. Abiola said, what’s the point, why are we here?

“When all that was going on, then, this Senator, who I would not acknowledge by mentioning his name, he then said if they are not ready about giving any testimony, I am here representing the Senate President as a respondent. I’m prepared to speak because we can’t continue with this. Then I said to him, ‘can you please shut up?’ Because we were just told that we couldn’t speak. And you have been speaking without any form of an equivalent treatment.

Advertisement

“You said we couldn’t speak because we were not ready to go into any conversation without our objections being addressed. Yes I said that. But he was already provoked, by the fact that he felt that we were not serious. Part of what inflamed it was that the petitioner said, by the way, it is this Senator that made a lot of statements about my Senator in words that were not complimentary.”

Share this story:
Continue Reading

Trending