Connect with us

News

Abia Tribunal: Issues arising from miscarriage of justice *Part One

Published

on

By Eze Chikamnayo

On Friday,  the 6th day of October,  2023, the reconstituted Governorship Tribunal that oscillated between Government House – Hotel Damgrette and the Court delivered it’s very predictable and widely considered  “Perverse ” Verdict in favour of their host, Mr Alex Otti.

Advertisement


Abians ignored them as they didn’t  disappoint those who were convinced ab-initio that their stay in Umuahia was a mere rehearsal.

Now that we are happily done with that unfortunate episode, let’s quickly examine some of the real issues  brought before the Tribunal which can neither be swept away nor sacrilegiously sacrificed on the altar of brinkmanship.

First, it is not the intendment of the Law that the Law should give with one hand and also take away with the other hand.

Advertisement


The Electoral Act clearly provided for witnesses to be subpoenaed and those witnesses can only be subpoenaed during the course of the tribunal trial, that’s after the petitioner has filled his petition.

The law did not contemplate and could not have contemplated a situation whereby witnesses of the adverse party would willingly depose to statements of oath for petitioners – to have enabled them file same along with their petition at the time of filling.

The above absurd and impossible scenario is what the trial tribunal held in their curious judgement which is clearly, to every discerning legal mind, an irrefutable error.

Advertisement


Ordinarily, once the final result of an election is declared, a party has just 21 days from the time of the declaration of results to file his petition.

The question which the tribunal failed to answer is whether a petitioner can get a tribunal which hasn’t started sitting to issue a subpoena on an adverse witness or party to compel such witness to make depositions for frontloading?

For instance, in the  Abia Gubernatorial Elections case, INEC is the 1st Respondent in the Petition. There’s therefore no way PDP or Chief Ahiwe would have gotten the Tribunal to  issue a Subpoena to get INEC to depose, sign and do all the administrative routine of the  subpoena and hand it over to PDP to enable them to file (all within 21 days) when the tribunal is yet to start sitting. That is not possible.

Advertisement


The tribunal judges very well know that a Subpoena is a document used to COMPEL witnesses to come to court – whether recalcitrant  witnesses or those who refuse to come UNLESS COMPELLED BY LAW.

The PDP and Chief Ahiwe took advantage of this provision of the law and brought the INEC witnesses to court yet the court unexplainably ruled that such witnesses should have been brought to depose at the time of filling!

By the wrongful exclusion of the official witnesses who came on subpoena, the tribunal willfully denied itself the benefit of their evidence both documentary and oral and in so doing, the petitioners were denied the benefits accruable from those evidence which inadvertently has evidently occasioned a glaring miscarriage of justice for which there should be an appeal.

Advertisement


Sadly, it is for such perplexing ground above that those who believe that tremendous amount of water has passed under the bridge in this Otti matter are predicating their position. This is a very sad story for the judiciary.

Another area of interest is what transpired regarding the Kano judgement which co-incidentally was put in evidence by Alex Otti and the Labour Party as Respondents – they were the ones that initialled that particular angle.

As we speak,  there is in existence, a Judgement in rem and in personna and subsisting to the effect that candidates of Labour Party were disqualified and that they had none for the elections.

Advertisement


Mr Alex Otti as shown by him as the Second Respondent, interestingly made efforts to appeal against the Kano Judgement in order to be hurriedly sworn in as Governor.

But that particular appeal is no longer subsisting by virtue of the operation of the Constitution and that leaves us only with the judgement of the Federal High Court Kano.

Invariably, the fact is that before the Law, Mr Alex Otti was not even a candidate during the gubernatorial elections for Abia State held on the 18th of March.

Advertisement


That is the irrefutable effect of the subsisting judgement of the Federal High Court Kano which remains and will continue to remain subsisting since the Constitutional window created for its appeal has forever elapsed.

In their decision, the Abia Gubernatorial Elections Tribunal again apparently glossed over the  grave implication of the Kano judgement whereas they are supposed to have given effect to that judgement which is subsisting. Moreso since that is the cardinal ground in contention which is that Mr Alex Otti was at the time of the elections not qualified.

Remember that the said particular matter that resulted in the judgement of the Federal High Court Kano was initiated even before the election so it is a pre- election matter; already pending at the time.

Advertisement


The tribunal ought to have correctly given effect to that subsisting judgement against which there is not and can never be an appeal again because constitutionally the time allowed for any appeal on the matter has expired.

Thirdly, the Electoral Act provided for declaration of results at different levels insitu. That is wherever that level of election or collation took place.

If election takes place in the unit, it MUST be DECLARED there. Then the result must be taken to the Ward Collation Center and it MUST be collated there. Thereafter, the collated ward results must be taken to the LGA Collation Center where they will again be collated and also ANNOUNCED and DECLARED.

Advertisement


In the case of Obingwa Local Government, when the results which has  duly passed through the Unit,  Ward and LGA collation stages, were now brought to the final/State Collation Center at Umuahia, the cantankerous Returning Officer, one Mrs  Nnenna Otti, for reasons best known to her, contrary to the provisions of the law decided that she wasn’t going to use the results ALREADY DECLARED AND ANNOUNCED IN OBINGWA LGA in the final collation at the state level.

She then brazenly took away the results to Abuja to be “RECOLLATED” ostensibly because she’s not comfortable with the outcome.

This illegal, hide and seek moves she did without notice to the political parties, again, contrary to the clear provisions of the Electoral Act and INEC Guidelines which makes it mandatory for the agents to witness what is happening.

Advertisement


After this  strange “RE – COLLATION EXPEDITION”  in far away Abuja, surprisingly no Agent of any political party witnessed or signed the new   “Abuja Results ” Nnenna Otti and her cohorts concocted and brought back after a whole three days!

In a very condescending manner, unscrupulous Mrs Nnenna Otti, the  obviously biased Returning Officer, came back and used the strange results to announce final scores thereby ROBBING THE PDP OF THEIR ADVANTAGE  ACCRUING FROM THEIR KNOWN STRONGHOLD AND DENYING THEM LAWFUL VOTES  already collated at all levels.

And that again, is one of the major reasons why the petitioners, Chief Ahiwe and the PDP complained that there was substantial non-compliance with the provisions of the law and then that Alex Otti and Labour Party did not win by majority of the votes cast.

Advertisement


In deciding this issue, the tribunal drew an instant explosion of noise and uproar in the Court Room from even journalists, when they magically held that the petitioners didn’t prove that the Obingwa LGA results were taken to Abuja –  A FACT OF PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE WHICH THE RESPONDENTS ALREADY ADMITTED TO IN THEIR OWN DEPOSITION EVEN VIA THEIR STAR WITNESS AND WHICH WAS REPORTED IN VERY MAJOR MEDIA OUTLETS ACROSS THE GLOBE!

Such glaring, “overzealous”,  miscarriage of justice in a FACT that would have entirely altered the outcome of the trial is another fundamental flaw.

With utmost respect to the Tribunal, this very perplexing finding made by them on the  issue of the manipulation and exclusion of LAWFUL VOTES already collated from Obingwa LGA is to say the least, untenable.

Advertisement


Cases in the Tribunal are fought principally on pleadings and the petitioners (Ahiwe/PDP), pleaded that the Obingwa results, was collated,  declared and announced at the LGA Collation Center at Obingwa and that when it was brought to Umuahia, the State Returning Officer, the reckless and incompetent Mrs Nnenna Otti suspended collation and took the results to Abuja for doctoring.

Interestingly, at the tribunal, both the Labour Party and Alex Otti admitted that they did go to Abuja with the Collated Obingwa LGA Results.

In fact,  Mrs Nnenna Otti had a deposition prepared for her attached to the reply of the respondents wherein she gave graphic details of what made her take the already collated Obingwa LGA Results to Abuja for  alteration.

Advertisement


So, the question of whether the Obingwa Results were taken to Abuja is not in dispute and it need not be proved any longer  because in Law,  A FACT THAT IS ADMITTED NEED NOT BE PROVED!

So, for the Tribunal to turn round and hold that the petitioners did not prove that the Obingwa Results were taken to Abuja is like a huge joke ; the 8th wonder of this world  and a travesty which has occasioned a gross miscarriage of Justice in this case.

As always, Alex Otti is miserably daft and ignorant. His petty reactions to what some people has since described as “prepared” and “prepaid” is pathetic.

Advertisement


After the widely rejected Judgement , he danced naked in the streets taunting his opponents to the divert monies they intend to spend on appeals for building roads in their villages.

Yet, it is this same diminutive Akex Otti who after the 2015 gubernatorial elections went all the way up to the Supreme Court three good times and crisscrossed all other available courts in Nigeria in his futile attempt to truncate the Electoral mandate of his predecessor.

By hastily mocking the APC and PDP after this very controversial and curious judgement, he is nonsensically gloating in futility over nothing.

Advertisement


An election tribunal lacks the power to ignore or set aside the decision of the Federal High Court. Also for you to subpoena a witness, you must situate the witness within a petition. INEC cannot claim that they monitored Abia Labour Congress when in actual fact, there was no congress to be monitored

These and many other grounds which are still available for legal scrutiny at the Appeal Court and the Supreme Court is the reason why the premature gyrations of Alex Otti is a sign of deliberate amnesia.

Judgements are not supposed to be transactional. However, it’s unfortunate that certain judicial pronouncements which often collapse when subjected to dispassionate legal scrutiny have become common place in our clime.

Advertisement


Unexplainable, politically motivated judgements dent the judiciary and whenever the dispensation of justice is colored by pecuniary interests. It certainly spells doom not just for our hallowed judiciary but for the entire society.

…to be continued.

Chikamnayo, former Information Commissioner, writes from Aba

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crime

Police shun N500million bribe in N7.8 billion Lagos drug haul

Published

on

“The suspect offered ₦500 million to the SPU commander in an attempt to make the team stand down and allow him to contact his associates to move the consignment elsewhere. The offer was rejected immediately and properly documented for further investigation.”

These were the exact words of Olohundare Jimoh Assistant Inspector General of Police (AIG), with which he detailed how operatives of the Zone 2 Command of the Nigeria Police Force (NPF) scoffed at a N500million bribe to turn their eyes off the importation of a huge consignment of drugs imported into the country.

Advertisement


This was part of the details of a major breakthrough by the operatives after bursting a major drug trafficking syndicate in Lagos, which led to the seizure of suspected illicit drugs estimated at ₦7.8 billion and arresting several suspects, including the alleged kingpin.

In the operation, reportedly carried out by officers of the Special Protection Unit (SPU) in collaboration with divisional police detectives, the operatives, were said to have stormed a house in Mende, Maryland area of Lagos,  following months of surveillance and intelligence gathering coordinated by the Zone 2 Headquarters.

The recovered drugs consisted of hundreds of bags of suspected Canadian Loud, allegedly stored in the residence of the prime suspect, Jimoh, said disclosing that the suspect was apprehended on May 19 after weeks of strategic monitoring by operatives.

Advertisement


Offering further details, he said the operation was executed with technical support and guidance from the Inspector-General of Police, IGP Olatunji Disu, alongside coordinated efforts between the SPU and divisional police teams.

Jimoh revealed that during the operation, the suspect allegedly attempted to bribe the SPU commander with ₦500 million to compromise the mission and allow the movement of the drug consignment.

The AIG described the development as a reflection of the renewed professionalism and operational discipline being entrenched in the Force under the current policing strategy.

Advertisement


He noted that the success of the operation underscored the importance of deploying specialized police units alongside conventional divisional teams in tackling organized crime.

According to him, the operation demonstrated the effectiveness of rapid containment strategies, intelligence-led policing, and professional conduct among the operatives involved in the raid.

“Rapid containment was achieved as the Special Protection Unit worked with divisional teams to secure the perimeter and prevent escape or interference with evidence.

Advertisement


“The operation was intelligence-driven, following months of surveillance and technical monitoring before the raid was carried out.

“The immediate rejection and documentation of the bribe attempt also reflect the standard expected from redeployed personnel at the divisional level,” Jimoh added.

Reacting to the development, the Inspector-General of Police, IGP Olatunji Disu, commended the operatives for their professionalism, saying the success of the operation validated the ongoing redeployment of personnel to divisions and units across Lagos and Ogun states.

Advertisement


The IGP noted: “Policing must be close to the people, and our specialized units must work side by side with divisional teams on the ground.

“The professionalism shown by the SPU commander in rejecting a ₦500 million bribe and following due procedure is the standard we expect. It shows that when you put your best foot forward at the grassroots, you get results and restore public trust.”

Disu further assured that the Force leadership would continue to reward integrity while holding officers accountable to the highest ethical standards.

Advertisement


Police authorities said exhibits recovered during the operation have been properly documented and will be tendered in court. The suspects are currently in custody while investigations continue to track down other members of the drug trafficking network.

 

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

News

We’re sorry – pope *It’s a wound on the memory of the Church

Published

on

Slavery is a wound on the memory of the Universal Church, Pope Leo XIV, said on Monday, as he issued a fresh apology over the participation of the the Catholic Church in the centuries-long delay in condemning slavery.

The pontiff stressed the position of the church after his predecessors had offered similar apologies, said: “For this, in the name of the Church, I sincerely ask for pardon.”

Advertisement


Writing in a major text that warned about “new forms of slavery” behind the digital economy, the joined John Paul II, who denounced slave trade in 1992 before issuing a sweeping request for forgiveness for historical injustices in 2000 and Pope Francis who also repeatedly denounced contemporary forms of slavery.

In his own vein, Pope Leo, pointed out that the Church owned slaves until the Middle Ages and it also advised European sovereigns on how to justify the enslavement of “infidels.”

He stressed in “Magnifica Humanitas” (Magnificent Humanity), a document focused primarily on the rise of artificial intelligence, that it was only in the 19th century that “a formal, absolute and universal condemnation of slavery was clearly articulated.”

Advertisement


Hear him: “It is true that past events cannot be judged anachronistically, as though the moral criteria that matured over time had always been available. Yet neither can we deny or diminish the delay with which both society and the Church came to denounce the scourge of slavery. This constitutes a wound in Christian memory, one from which we cannot consider ourselves detached.”

 

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

News

‘Content creator’ lands in police net over ‘fake’ video on terrorist attacks

Published

on

Qowiy Oloyede, a resident of Oriya Sokoto road, Atan Ota, is currently telling operatives of the Ogun State Colice command, the reasons that pushed him into making a video suggesting that a part of the state was under attack of terrorists, knowing same to be fake.

Oloyede, reports say, dragged to the police on May 23 by one Ayinla Sodiq, who accused him of creating and sharing a misleading TikTok video falsely claiming that bandits had invaded the Atan Ota community..

Advertisement


Zagazola Makama, a counterinsurgency publication, which broke the news, said on immediately being questioning by the Divisional Police Officer (DPO), Oloyed, allegedly confessed to fabricating the video to gain followers on social media.

Apart from admitting that that he created the fake bandit attack content to gain followers and trend online, said in a video currently on social media the herder featured in the clip was a cattle rearer who usually grazed cows behind his shop and had initially refused to participate before eventually agreeing.

Oloyede, who also claimed he could neither read nor write, adding that his apprentice wrote the caption accompanying the video posted online, maintained that he had only produced and posted two similar videos, one on Monday and another on Wednesday.

Advertisement


The command, said to have recovered photographs and video evidence linked to the fake publication during preliminary investigation, added that the suspect would be transferred to the State Criminal Investigation and Intelligence Department (SCIID), Abeokuta, for further investigation, warning  residents against spreading false information capable of causing panic and public disorder, and for the public to verify information before sharing content on social media.

 

Advertisement


Share this story:
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024. WhirlwindNews